Questioning Women's Solidarity: The Case of Land Rights, Santal Parganas, Jharkhand, India (original) (raw)
Related papers
Questioning Women’s Solidarity: The Case of land rights
Women's land rights have been on the policy agenda in India for at least the last 20 years. Yet not much has happened on the ground. Why have not women mobilised to claim rights to land? What have been the limits to collective action by women around land rights? Through fieldwork in the Santal Parganas, Jharkhand, India, this article explores these questions. Firstly, the socially embedded nature of land as a resource and the mutuality and interdependence between men and women in the productive use of land needs to be recognised. Consequently, more than gender identities, it is other cross-cutting identities of ethnicity, education, kinship relations and marital status that both motivate women to stake their claims to land as well as oppose the claims of other women and men. Secondly, women's land claims seem to have a chance of becoming effective only if they have some male support, hence rather than aligning with other women, those who are serious in their claims seek to build alliances with men, particularly those able to influence the argument in their favour. Just as amongst women, there is considerable evidence to show that men too adopt different subject-positions depending on their own experience and context. Finally, by attempting to present women's land claims as a gender issue, not only is it found that women are unwilling to mobilise around this issue, but there is also an enhanced resistance from men.
Are we not peasants too? Land rights and women's claims in India
http://www.popcouncil.org. Statements made and views expressed in this publication are solely the responsibility of the author and not of any organization providing support for SEEDS. Any part of this document may be reproduced without permission of the author so long as it is not sold for profit.
The Neoliberal Globalization and Indian Village: Changing terms of discourse on Women's Land Rights
The myth of 'Men Farmer' was already blasted long back. Further, in South Asia, there has been a highly gendered agrarian transition, as men move faster to non-farm jobs than women leading to a much discussed phenomenon 'feminization of agriculture'. In the context of agriculture becoming increasingly less profitable, men move out of agriculture leaving behind women to take care of their farms. In 2004-05, 49% of male workers but 65% of all women workers and 83% of rural female workers were still in agriculture (NSSO 2004-05), and their percentage was rising. An estimated 35% of households are de facto female-headed from widowhood, marital breakdown, or male outmigration, and overall 38.9% of all agricultural workers are women (NSSO 2004-05). Many are uneducated and possess few skills beyond farming. Farm size is also falling and landlessness is growing. Women constitutes most of the landless, typically owning no land themselves even when born or married into landed households. Indeed, given intra-household inequalities in resource distribution, there are poor women in non-poor households whose work contributions (as unpaid family workers) are usually invisible, and who remain atomized and isolated as workers.
Gender analysis of land: beyond land rights for women?
Gender analysts of development have worked on land and property relations in poor rural areas for over two decades and the JAC 2003 special issue carried a range of work reflecting some of these research trajectories. This article is both a response to Bina Agarwal’s paper on ‘Gender and Land Rights Revisited’, in which she reiterates her advocacy of land rights, and also an argument for why we should temper her transformatory expectations, recognize the complexity of what she sees as ‘social obstacles’ to women claiming land, and not rush to policy closure on land rights in all circumstances, or to blanket prescriptions. It argues for a renewed emphasis on reflexive ethnographic research with a focus on gender as social relations, on subject positions and subjectivities, on the meshing of shared and separate interests within households and on power residing in discourse as well as material assets.
Gender and Land Rights Revisited: Exploring New Prospects via the State, Family and Market
Journal of Agrarian Change, 2003
The question of women's land rights has a relatively young history in India. This paper briefly traces that history before examining why gendering the land question remains critical, and what the new possibilities are for enhancing women's land access. Potentially, women can obtain land through the State, the family and the market. The paper explores the prospects and constraints linked to each, arguing that access through the family and the market deserve particular attention, since most arable land in India is privatized. On market access, the paper makes several departures from existing discussions by focusing on the advantages, especially for poor women, of working in groups to lease in or purchase land; using government credit for land rather than merely for micro-enterprises; and collectively managing purchased or leased in land, the collectivity being constituted with other women, rather than with family members. Such group functioning is shown to have several advantages over individual or family-based farming. This approach could also help revive land reform, community cooperation and joint farming in a radically new form, one centred on poor women.
Women's Land Rights and the Law: The Legislative Framework Governing Women's Land Rights in India
2017
The principle of gender equality is enshrined in the Indian Constitution in its Preamble, Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties and Directive Principles. There is a direct relationship between women's Right to land, economic empowerment, food security and poverty reduction. A gender approach to land rights can enable shifts in gender power Relations, and assure that all people, regardless of sex, benefit from, and are empowered by, Development policies and practices to improve People's rights to land. Although women play a key role in agricultural work and food production, their land rights are most tenuous. Much like those of women of any other country, property rights of Indian women have evolved out a continuing struggle between the status quo and the progressive forces. And pretty much like the Property rights of women elsewhere, property rights of Indian women too are unequal and unfair under different personal laws. Land governance in India is at a crossroads. This pa...
Women's Land Rights: A Status Review
Journal of Advanced Research in English and Education Volume 9, Issue 2 - 2024, Pg. No. 1-8 Peer Reviewed Journal, 2024
This article explores the intricate relationship between land reforms, caste, and gender in India, particularly in Tamil Nadu against the backdrop of broader socio-economic development goals. Land reform policies in India initiated post-independence, aimed to dismantle the feudal land ownership structures and redistribute land to marginalised communities. However, the implementation of these reforms has been inconsistent, and their impact on Dalits and women has been particularly complex and varied. By examining historical reports, government policies, and academic research, this article analyses the effectiveness of land reforms in promoting socio-economic equity. It delves into the caste-based disparities in land ownership and highlights the limited success of reforms in truly empowering Dalits. Furthermore, the article underscores the gendered dimension of land ownership, revealing how patriarchal norms continue to hinder women’s access to land despite legal provisions for gender equity. Case studies from Tamil Nadu are utilised to illustrate the ground realities and challenges faced by marginalised groups in securing land rights. The article also critiques the existing policy framework and suggests the need for more inclusive and effective strategies that address both caste and gender biases in land distribution and ownership. In conclusion, the article calls for a re-evaluation of land reform policies with a focus on intersectionality, ensuring that future reforms are not only just in theory but also equitable in practice, thereby contributing to the broader goals of social justice and sustainable development.
Gendering Agrarian issues in UP
2005
A s livelihood security of marginalized groups comes increasingly under threat, particularly in the context of economic liberalization, issues of land rights assume criticality in the countryside. In this essay I argue for a gendered understanding of land issues, since with the growth of new export-oriented and private agricultural industries seeking to establish control over agricultural lands, the poorer sections-and among them women in particular-are losing control over basic resources. Further, with the emphasis on land rights being granted to single holders, there is a steady erosion of the layering of rights over the same piece of land, which, in the past, ensured the legitimacy of informal access to use by multiple users and multiple claimants. In this context, land rights for women has come to encompass a whole gamut of strategies for securing rural women's livelihoods, rather than simply establishing legal title over land. As women do not constitute a homogeneous category but are located within distinct class and caste hierarchies, the essay will also seek to establish the links between women's shrinking resource base and their corresponding stakes in the struggle for equitable distribution of productive resources. The arguments presented in this essay are drawn from a variety of sources ranging from fieldwork involving in-depth interviews and participant observation, to village surveys and workshop participation. The core of the evidence pertains to ongoing fieldwork in villages of Badlapur block in the eastern UP district of Jaunpur, combined with preliminary village survey material and intermittent short field visits to villages of Manikpur block during January-March 1998. The fieldwork evidence pertains to villages Barsara and Dehiyan in Jaunpur, and villages Rukmakhurd, Hela and Harijanpur in Banda district of the Bundelkhand region. Between 1997 and 2000, I was a regular participant at grassroots workshops organized by the 'UP Abhiyan Samiti for Land Reforms and Labour Rights', a loose coalition of approximately 30 NGOs working on
Religions
This article links the feminist debate on women’s land rights in India to the current academic debate on critical human-nature relationships in the Anthropocene by studying how married Hindu women weigh the pros and cons of claiming land in their natal family and how they practice their lived relatedness to land in rural Udaipur (Rajasthan, North India). The article disentangles the complex issue of why women do not respond eagerly to Indian state policies that for a long time have promoted gender equality in the domain of land rights. In reaction to the dominant feminist debate on land rights, the authors introduce religion and more-than-human sociality as analytical foci in the examination of women’s responsiveness to land legislation. Their ethnographic study is based on fieldwork with married women in landowning families in four villages in Udaipur’s countryside. The authors argue that women have well-considered reasons not to claim natal land, and that their intimate relatednes...