Problems and Methods in Arab Crossroads Studies (original) (raw)
Description: This seminar aims to, on the one hand, introduce students to the main theoretical and epistemological trends in the study of the Arab Crossroads region, and on the other, to offer practical examples of the types of methodologies used by scholars working in the humanities and the qualitative social sciences. The course begins with a critical engagement with the strengths and weaknesses of area studies, and the politics of producing knowledge on a region that is of such global economic and political importance. It then turns to specific areas of research that have attracted considerable attention in the fields of history, anthropology, literature, and politics, before exploring the various methodological approaches used by practitioners of these fields. The course assignments include response papers, short essays on specific debates in relevant scholarship, transcribed interviews, and culminate in an extended research proposal for a capstone project.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
On the Margins of the Arab World
International Journal of Middle East Studies, 2020
The western Egyptian desert separates the Maghrib geographically from the other three still existent sub-regions of the Arab world so eloquently delineated by Albert Hourani. 1 Often perceived as not quite Arab, nor sufficiently Islamic, nor really African by outside observers, North Africa does indeed remain culturally distinct from Western Asia. 2 The region's colonization by France as well as Italy and Spain that commenced during the 19 th century further accentuated this division, which was subsequently reproduced by Western academia. The historiography on the modern Maghrib consequently became the purview of francophone scholars. For example, studies of North African nationalism written in English-with the notable exception of the Algerian Revolution-remain scarce. 3 So how do we overcome this historiographical
Middle East-Topics & Arguments Shifting epistemologies in area Studies: From Space to Scale
Area studies suffer from various epistemic borderlines which have been drawn and grown during decades of constructing a 'world order' that is ultimately defined by political power relations. The question of what constitutes an 'area' or a 'region' is a timely and contested one. Moreover, epistemic borderlines have been constructed by a hegemonic way of identifying academic disciplines. The separation between area studies and disciplines, too, is a decision based on global epistemic power relations. The following paper addresses the constructivist dimension of area studies and disciplines. The main argument is that area studies and disciplines are not primarily bound to geographical settings but derive from a politically-informed defining and 'scaling' of localities, ethnicities, languages, religions , and cultures. A debate that is well established and continues to arouse attention is the debate over the questions of how, why, and to what end discipli...
Anthropology of the Middle East: An Overview
Soraya Altorki's edited volume advances our understanding of a number of issues setting at the core of the Anthropology of the Middle East. Given the vast size of the region and the diversity of topics presented by the scholars, this volume is neither an exhaustive country profile nor solely an account of where ethnographic research stands nowadays with respect to each topic. According to Altorki, A Companion to the Anthropology of the Middle East (2015) focuses on three interrelated points: (1) the main theoretical and methodological questions that anthropologists have asked about their topic in recent decades, (2) the existing gaps or " silences " in the academic literature, and (3) the future direction of anthropological research in a region that is undergoing socioeconomic and demographic changes (Altorki, xxi). The contributors of this volume effectively demonstrate that the Middle East is not a dormant region. It is rather a dynamic region composed of old and new urbanites living in stratified societies who are also engaged in the global flow of ideals and materials in the existing Information Age (Kozma et. al 2015). The volume, wherever applicable, weaves local topics or microhistories into broader trends that transcends the parochial narrative of the nation-states and the compartmentalized view of area studies professionals. The contributors successfully navigate the boundaries of the nation-states by situating their study within the wider anthropological themes. By focusing on the interrelated cultures, histories, and identities of the peoples in the overland archipelago we call the Middle East, it makes this volume useful for other social scientists and historians who have an academic interest in the theoretical and
This document is currently being converted. Please check back in a few minutes.