The Rise of a New Political Class? Emerging New Parties and the populist challenge in Western Europe (original) (raw)
Related papers
Absorbing the Blow: Populist Parties and their Impact on Parties and Party Systems
Populism has fascinated scholars around the world for generations. In Europe, the progressive rise of populist actors since the 1990sdefined by Cas Mudde as the populist zeitgeist (2004)resulted in a flourishing scholarship that has explored the determinants of populists' success, their programmatic and organizational features, and their policy impact. At the same time, it has shaped a heated debate over what populism, a highly contested concept, is and how it can be defined.
Populism, Democracy, and Party System Change in Europe
Annual Review of Political Science
How has populism transformed party systems in Europe? I survey the varieties of populism, the sources of their support and the different ways that they appeal to voters. I use data from the Chapel Hill Expert Survey to explore whether populist parties are intensifying competition on the cultural dimension, accelerating the decline of mainstream parties, and increasing polarization. I argue that while left and center populist parties have upended existing structures of competition, it is longstanding conservative parties, remodeled using ethnopopulism, that have been the most consequential for the substance of political competition and the trajectory of domestic politics. I consider the behavior of incumbents and argue that varieties of populism should shape our expectations of what happens when populists rule: While left populist parties in power over the last decade have tended to become more ordinary, sometimes even shedding antiestablishment and anti-EU positions, ethnopopulist p...
Politics and Governance
This article provides a comparative conclusion to the thematic issue on the organisational characteristics of 12 right-wing populist parties (RWPPs) across Europe. We observe that many RWPPs—at least partially—adopt features of the mass party model. This finding illustrates the ideological aspects behind organisational choices: For populist parties, in particular, it is important to signal societal rootedness and “closeness to the people.” It furthermore challenges the idea that there is a one-way teleological movement towards more lean, electoral-professional kinds of party organisation. At the same time, the case studies clearly illustrate that RWPP leaders and executives continue to exercise great power over their members, who are essentially offered “participation without power.”
The populist cat-dog: applying the concept of populism to contemporary European party systems
Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(1), 2014, 99-118
Populism is a frequently used yet problematic concept; the term is often ill-defined and randomly applied. While these problems have been widely acknowledged, this article argues that there are still issues with the way populism tends to be used, even if a sound definition is provided. This relates to the fact that it is often not clear whether populism is used to refer to an ideological feature of an exclusive category of political parties or whether populism is seen as a type of discourse which can be expressed by any political actor. In order to illustrate the difficulties with regard to the application of the term populism, several ‘hard’ cases of populism across Europe are discussed. The article argues that in order to stimulate a more accurate use of the term, observers should be explicit not only about the meaning of populism, but also about the form in which it manifests itself.
Populist Parties in Contemporary Europe
2020
Populism is the “40 is the new 30” of political research, buzzing for the last two decades with what seems as an unfading energy. A lot of attention has been paid to defining the phenomena and outlining its general features. Significantly less notice has been paid to political parties. Even less work has been done on comparative party populism in contemporary Europe, one that would take into consideration social, political and historical aspects. This paper fills this void. Examining sixteen European populist parties and movements across the continent, we argue that while all adhere to the standard populist framework, there is not one but four populisms in contemporary Europe. We demonstrate our argument by positioning the case selection against the following dichotomies: exclusionary v. inclusionary populism, authoritarian v. non-authoritarian populism, strong nativist v. weak nativist populism, and radical democratic v. conspiratorial populism. Based on these variables, we introdu...
Politics and Governance, 2021
This thematic issue assesses the organisational forms of a broad range of right‐wing populist parties (RWPPs) across Europe (12 in total). It interrogates received wisdom about the supposed leader‐centeredness of such parties and investigates, in particular, the extent to which the mass party, as an organisational model, remains popular among RWPPs. This introduction presents the aims, research questions, and analytical framework of the issue and justifies its selection of cases. The resilience of the mass party model highlighted in many articles challenges the dominant trend that party organisation literature has identified: a unidirectional shift towards “catch‐all,” “electoral‐professional,” or “cartel” organisations.
Party choice in Europe: Social cleavages and the rise of populist parties
Party Politics
Does the rise of populist parties of the right and left indicate the fading of the traditional left–right cleavage and the rise of a new transnational cleavage? Our analysis finds evidence of a continued left–right cleavage that divides European parties by religion and class. Our analysis also finds strong evidence for an additional transnational cleavage that pits the populists of right and left against the traditional parties of the “frozen” center. Right-Wing Populist parties attract young, working-class, and less educated voters, more often male, who are disconnected from religious institutions, perceive the national economy and their own economic status in a negative vein, and do not like immigrants. They distrust their own national government and the European Union. The Populist Left trends even younger, lower in status and education, more pessimistic about economic concerns, and just as hostile to political elites. The populists—left and right—may be divided over some aspects...
Explaining the impact of new parties in the Western European party systems
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties , 2019
In recent years, and particularly following the impact of the “great recession”, Western European party systems have undergone profound change. New parties have emerged and been successful, thus radically changing the structure of inter-party competition. So far, research on new parties has been mainly conducted from party-level and election-centred perspectives. Here, instead, we focus on party system innovation (PSInn), meaning the impact of new parties on Western European party systems, and on the factors that explain such impact, by adopting a systemic perspective and taking into account all the arenas where inter-party competition takes place (i.e. elections, parliaments and governments). For this purpose, this article relies on an original dataset on the performances of new parties in terms of votes, seats, and ministerial posts, covering about 350 elections and 670 governments in 20 countries, over the period 1945–2017. The results of the analysis show a notable increase in PSInn over the last decade, in particular with regard to the electoral and parliamentary arenas. Moreover, data show that PSInn in the electoral and the parliamentary arenas is mainly predicted by turnout change, while in the governmental arena is instead driven by the country’s economic performance.
Here to Stay? Populism as a New Party Type
European Review, 2008
This article addresses the sudden and somewhat unexpected rise of populist parties in West, Central, and Eastern Europe. The first section highlights the core characteristics of populism through the construction of an ideal type. Subsequently, the focus is on the opportunity structures that give rise to populism, emphasizing the end of the post-war settlement, post-industrialism, the gradual erosion of party politics, and frustrations emanating from the consolidation of liberal democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. The final section examines three distinct forms of populism, focusing on radical-right populism (parties such as the French National Front, the Austrian Freedom Party), center-right populism (Forza Italia), and left populism (the German Party of Democratic Socialism).
The Challenge of Populist Parties at both Ends of the the Ideological Spectrum
Joint Citizen Forces – Common European Future, 2019
In: Hribar D (ed.) Joint Citizen Forces – Common European Future. Ljubljana: Slovenian Paneuropean Movement, pp. 42–48. Since the great recession, populist parties are involved in many of the key electoral battles in Europe. Within the right side of the political spectrum, populist right-wing parties have posed the most serious challenges to other right-wing parties, as the case of Italy illustrates, where the Lega has displaced traditional right-wing parties to a secondary role in the country’s political life. Likewise, the battle for the left, which traditionally has involved the competition of socialists or social-democrats with communist or post-communist parties, has been transformed and populist left-wing parties have taken the place of post-communist ones. Again, in some countries, like Greece or Italy, traditional socialist parties have been outcompeted by their populist counterparts. On top of discussing the developments that brought this situation into being, this chapter presents the challenges posed by both populist right-wing parties and populist left-wing parties. It also discusses some of the factors that affect their success and the profiles of those who feel appealed by their programmes.