Political culture and national identity in Russian-Ukrainian relations (original) (raw)
Related papers
Russian National Identity and the Russia-Ukraine Crisis
The history and geography of Russia led to a national identity which relies on terms such as empire and nationalism. At the same time the identities of Russia and the former USSR have never been separated and thus the age-long desire for the status of an internationally recognised great power still lingers. This identity concept, the specific form of nationalism, and the perception that "the West" constitutes Russia's negative "other" are crucial to understand Russia's course in the Ukraine crisis. Moreover, this composition of characteristics will define Russian political culture in the foreseeable future.
National Identity in Ukraine: History and Politics
RUSSIA IN GLOBAL AFFAIRS, 2022
This article studies the historical background that determined the formation of the specific features of Ukrainian, Little Russian, and Russian identities starting from the late 17th century to the present day. It traces the evolution of Ukrainian identity from the notion of "a single Slavic-Russian people" to the current radicalization and consolidation of anti-Russian sentiment as its dominant element. At different stages of nation-building, intellectual elites molded different constructs of this identity. At times these constructs existed in parallel and independently of each other, and at other times they confronted one another. The notion of a single people (or different peoples) constantly changed. The article highlights the key
Nationalities Papers, 1998
The huge Russian diaspora created in the wake of the Soviet Union's collapse creates a great challenge to nation builders throughout the “near abroad.” Especially in Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Ukraine, by virtue of their size, Russian populations must be integrated into new political communities where they now have minority status. The building of cohesive, unified nation states requires that the identities and loyalties of these Russians be directed toward their new states. If Russians can identify with the broader community dominated by the titular ethnic group and simultaneously maintain a strong ethnic consciousness and loyalty toward the Russian Federation, then national integration can proceed in a relatively straightforward manner. But if creating a state-wide, national identity entails the weakening of Russian ethnic identity and the breaking of emotional and physical attachments to Russia, then national integration will be a much more conflictual and difficult proc...
Russian national identity: old traumas and new challenges
Published in S. Smyth & C. Opitz (Eds.), Negotiating Linguistic, Cultural and Social Identities in the Post-Soviet World (pp. 87-108). Oxford, UK, Bern, etc.: Peter Lang, 2013. The Chapter analyzes difficulties associated with the academic analysis, socio-political and everyday connotations of Russian national identity, focusing on transformations and challenges it has faced since the end of the Soviet Union. It problematizes Russian national identity as the creation of political and cultural elites, which often failed to engage the masses in a corresponding movement of national revival. The perspective adopted is that of historical phenomenology: Russian national identity is perceived as a dynamic construct shaped by a diachronic historical perspective on the one hand, and a synchronic geopolitical perspective on the other. The Chapter presents a descriptive case study to address the question of what exactly are the main components of Russian national identity and how they structure ethno-national perceptions at the elite and mass levels of society. The conclusions focus on the underdevelopment and amorphousness of the Russian national character, and explain why it has been problematic to situate Russian national identity in an unambiguously defined state-bearing nation or ethnicity.
Russian-Ukrainian Crisis, National Identity and Democratic Consolidation in Ukraine
2016
In 2016, Ukraine faces multiple problems in terms of its divided identity, corrupted elites, poor economy and hostile Russia on its eastern borders. Proper understanding of Ukrainian complex identity-building process requires some familiarity with history of the USSR and its management of nationalities, although, certainly Ukraine had possessed a huge historical legacy long before the USSR and that also had influenced its cultural memory. Ukraine can be compared with many other post-communist states that these days are divided between Soviet mentality and modern nation-building but it is also sort of unique because of its geographical position on the crossroads of Western and Russian civilizational influences. Geopolitics has always been important to Ukraine's national identification. However, it should not imply that Ukraine has been only an object of contestation between Russia and the EU and not an actor on its own as some neo-realists would say as, for example, John Mearsheimer who has suggested it was West who provoked Russia's aggression to maintain its sphere of influence in Ukraine. 1 Geopolitics is certainly important to Ukrainian future but it is still not as decisive as domestic politics and reforms that country has been undergoing since Euromaidan. Russia's involvement in modern Ukraine has been contradictory to say the least and it is hard not to give acknowledgement to Ukrainian nation for finally rejecting Russian paternalism and cultural influence that under Vladimir Putin has obtained neo-imperialist and authoritarian colors. After all, Russia had supported pro-Russian Ukrainian oligarchs from
National identity in Ukraine from foreign policy perspective
Internal and external factors of objective and subjective character of forming foreign policy identity of Ukrainian citizens are considered. The conflict essence of political identities of Ukrainian citizens, their inconsistency and ambivalence have been highlighted on the basis of statistical data. The conclusion has been drawn that a lack of consolidated political identity in the state proves to be a serious threat to realization of democratic reforms, advance of national interests of Ukraine in the international relations, preservation of territorial integrity.
The Development of National Identities in Ukraine
From “the Ukraine” to Ukraine A Contemporary History, 1991–2021, edited by Edited by Matthew Rojansky, Georgiy Kasianov and Mykhailo Minakov , 2021
Analysis of changes in national identities in Ukraine from the late perestroika period until present times, with particular focus on identities during times of conflict (the Euromaidan and the war in Donbas).
Ukraine’s Ongoing Struggle with its Russian Identity
Ukrainian politicians commonly say that the language issue only comes up during election campaigns, but then these same politicians have also come to blows in the parliament over this issue. This suggests that deep-seated and unresolved concerns lie at the heart of the language issue. To appreciate these we need to look at who actually uses which language, and the different cultural and political agendas behind one’s choice of language.