Towards an ecosystem approach to policy process insights from the sustainable livelihoods and ecosystem health approaches (original) (raw)
Related papers
Governing for ecosystem health and human well-being
2018
Governance arrangements and processes influence access to and benefits from ecosystem services, and therefore the potential for ecosystem services to alleviate poverty. Governance also then influences the health of ecosystems. This chapter learns from decades of governance-related research to identify how to make ecosystem governance more effectively ‘pro-poor’. It is informed by a systematic mapping of literature related to governance of ecosystem services and renewable natural resources for improved wellbeing and poverty alleviation, expert interviews and a workshop with government and non-government actors across a range of sectors from both North and South. The chapter is organised around the concept of trade-offs, considering first ecosystem-focused approaches, then rights-based approaches and lastly, participatory approaches to governance. The chapter further addresses the relevance of scale and multiple administrative levels (multi-level governance) and the importance of info...
Economic and political weekly
Exploring the prospects of the ecosystem services approach for natural resource management and poverty alleviation in India, this paper points out that it is vital to have an understanding of the political economy of negotiations over natural resource use. An appreciation of the synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services is equally important to develop better strategies for pro-poor ecosystem management. If the distributional outcomes associated with alternative options for natural resource management are neglected, there is a risk that such interventions may fail because of resistance from those who are excluded or those who stand to lose.
Raupelienė A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2017; 23-24 November 2017 – Kaunas, Lithuania. pp. 1010-1016, 2017
In rural areas, especially in low and middle-income countries, livelihoods have to diversify to include new on- and off-farm activities. However, sustainable livelihood concepts have so far not sufficiently accommodated transition dynamics. Mostly, rural livelihoods and sustainability transitions are addressed separately in the scientific literature. The aim of this review paper is to explore opportunities to integrate the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA) and the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on transitions. We provide an overview of the SLA and MLP. We then focus on the conceptual linkages between SLA and MLP, in particular regarding livelihood diversification strategies. Our review shows that the conceptual overlaps of the SLA and the MLP allow for a meaningful combination of both approaches to harness their respective strengths. Vulnerabilities from the SLA perspective (e.g. shocks, trends, changes) are considered at the landscape level in MLP. Policies, institutions, processes in SLA are part of ‘regime’ in the MLP heuristic. The livelihood diversification in SLA, e.g. the development of new on- and off-farm activities, can be described as niches in MLP. Some empirical work on agricultural transitions from the MLP perspective has adopted a territorial approach to take into consideration the pluri-activity of farms and the interactions between different subsystems (food, energy and tourism). This resonates well with the idea of livelihood diversification as a strategy in SLA. We conclude that integrating SLA and MLP will help to better understand livelihood diversification processes and we provide a preliminary proposal for a livelihood transition framework.
Eliminate Poverty by Managing Ecosystem Services for Rural Communities
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY FIELD, 2024
Abstract: Ecosystem services play a significant role in sustaining the livelihood of rural communities. The paper explicitly that the rich and poor both are dependent on resources but their purpose of usage is varied. The research has tried to comprehend the socioeconomic conditions of the households and assessed their dependency on ecosystem services available in the surroundings. The case study approach has been considered for in-depth analysis. Both primary and secondary data were collected to analyze the status of ecosystem services and their impact on people’s livelihoods. The collected data were analyzed through qualitative and quantitative methods for the better illustration of the case study. The research has tried to develop an integrated framework for sustainable living in rural communities with an emphasis on the management of ecosystem services. The paper asserted that greater involvement of institutions is vital for eradicating poverty through better management of ecosystem services at a local level.