The Importance of the Organization of Partner Knowledge in Understanding Perceptions of Relationship Quality and Conflict Resolution Behavior in Married Couples (original) (raw)

Abstract

sparkles

AI

The study investigates how the cognitive organization of partner knowledge influences perceptions of relationship quality and conflict resolution behaviors in married couples. It explores the importance of integrating positive and negative perceptions of partners to maintain relationship satisfaction. The findings indicate that effective cognitive structuring can shape the way couples experience and manage conflicts, ultimately impacting relational dynamics.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (47)

  1. Acitelli, K., & Young, A. M. (1996). Gender and thought in relation- ships.
  2. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge struc- tures in close relationships: A social psychological perspective (pp. 147-168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  3. Braiker, H. B., & Kelley, H. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135-168). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  4. Brickman, P. (1987). Commitment, conflict, and caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  5. Bumpass, L. L. (1990). What's happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography, 27, 483-498.
  6. Buss, D. M. (1991). Conflict in married couples: Personality predic- tors of anger and upset. Journal of Personality, 59, 663-688.
  7. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 193-221.
  8. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discrimi- nant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
  9. Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A guided tour. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342.
  10. Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2001). Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 447-462.
  11. Cherlin, A. J. (1992). Marriage, divorce, remarriage (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  12. Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73-81.
  13. Cramér, H. (1946). Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  14. Eggeman, K., Moxley, V., & Schumm, W. R. (1985). Assessing spouses' perceptions of Gottman's temporal form in marital con- flict. Psychological Reports, 57, 171-181.
  15. Everitt, B. S. (1977). The analysis of contingency tables. London: Chapman & Hall.
  16. Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). Ideals, per- ceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 933-940.
  17. Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 54-71.
  18. Fournier, D. G., Olson, D. H., & Druckman, J. M. (1983). Assessing marital and premarital relationships: The PREPARE/ENRICH inventories. In E. E. Filsinger (Ed.), Marriage and family assess- ment (pp. 229-250). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  19. Gottman, J. M. (1979). Detecting cyclicity in social interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 338-348.
  20. Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  21. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes pre- dictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221-233.
  22. Graham, S. M., & Clark, M. S. (2006). Self-esteem and organization of valenced information about others: The "Jekyll and Hyde"-ing of relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 652-665.
  23. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 93-98.
  24. Holmes, J. G., & Murray, S. L. (1996). Conflict in close relationships. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 622-654). New York: Guilford.
  25. John, O. P., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psy- chology (pp. 339-369). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital inter- action, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075-1092.
  27. Karney, B. R., & Frye, N. E. (2002). "But we've been getting better lately": Comparing prospective and retrospective views of relation- development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 222-238.
  28. Kelly, E. L., & Conley, J. J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 27-40.
  29. Kurdek, L. A. (1999). The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality for husbands and wives over the first 10 years of marriage. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1283-1296.
  30. Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3-23.
  31. Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1999). The (mental) ties that bind: Cognitive structures that predict relationship resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1228-1244.
  32. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996a). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfac- tion in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79-98.
  33. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996b). The self- fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155-1180.
  34. Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 480-497.
  35. Richmond, L. D., Craig, S. S., & Ruzicka, M. F. (1991). Self-moni- toring and marital adjustment. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 177-188.
  36. Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273.
  37. Showers, C. (1992). Compartmentalization of positive and negative self-knowledge: Keeping bad apples out of the bunch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1036-1049.
  38. Showers, C. J. (1995). The evaluative organization of self-knowledge. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 101- 120). New York: Plenum.
  39. Showers, C. J., & Kevlyn, S. B. (1999). Organization of knowledge about a relationship partner: Implications for liking and loving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 958-971.
  40. Showers, C. J., & Kling, K. C. (1996). The organization of self-knowl- edge: Implications for mood regulation. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self- regulation (pp. 151-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  41. Showers, C. J., & Limke, A. (2006). Organization of partner knowl- edge: Implications for liking and loving, longevity, and change. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships (pp. 177- 192). New York: Guilford.
  42. Showers, C. J., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2004). Organization of partner knowledge: Relationship outcomes and longitudinal change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1198-1210.
  43. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 15-28.
  44. Sprecher, S. (1999). "I love you more today than yesterday": Romantic partners' perceptions of changes in love and related affect over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 46-53.
  45. Swann, W. B., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J. G. (1994). Authenticity and positive strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 857-869.
  46. Veroff, J., Douvan, E., Orbuch, T. L., & Acitelli, L. K. (1998). Happiness in stable marriages: The early years. In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 152- 179). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Walker, A. J., & Thompson, L. (1983). Intimacy and intergenera- tional aid and contact among mothers and daughters. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45, 841-849.