Viral Class 1 RNase III Involved in Suppression of RNA Silencing (original) (raw)

Identification of an RNA Silencing Suppressor from a Plant Double-Stranded RNA Virus

Journal of Virology, 2005

RNA silencing is a mechanism which higher plants and animals have evolved to defend against viral infection in addition to regulation of gene expression for growth and development. As a counterdefense, many plant and some animal viruses studied to date encode RNA silencing suppressors (RSS) that interfere with various steps of the silencing pathway. In this study, we report the first identification of an RSS from a plant double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus. Pns10, encoded by S10 of Rice dwarf phytoreovirus RDV), exhibited RSS activity in coinfiltration assays with the reporter green fluorescent protein (GFP) in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana line 16c carrying GFP. The other gene segments of the RDV genome did not have such a function. Pns10 suppressed local and systemic silencing induced by sense RNA but did not interfere with local and systemic silencing induced by dsRNA. Expression of Pns10 also increased the expression of ␤-glucuronidase in transient assays and enhanced Potato virus X pathogenicity in N. benthamiana. Collectively, our results establish Pns10 as an RSS encoded by a plant dsRNA virus and further suggest that Pns10 targets an upstream step of dsRNA formation in the RNA silencing pathway.

Viral Suppressors of RNA Silencing in Plants

In eukaryotes, small RNAs play a crucial regulatory role in many processes including development, maintenance of genome stability and antiviral responses. These different but overlapping RNA-guided pathways are collectively termed 'RNA silencing'. In plants, RNA silencing serves as a major line of antiviral defense that is induced by, and targeted against viruses. As a counter-defensive strategy, viruses have evolved to encode suppressor proteins that inhibit various stages of the silencing process. These suppressors are diverse in sequence and structure and appear to be encoded by virtually any type of plant viruses. This review focuses on the novel methods of suppressor screening and revealing the characteristics of RNA silencing suppressors. We have also discussed the mechanism of suppression activity, which principally operate by modifying the accumulation, activity, and/or transmission of siRNAs through either direct interaction with the RNA species or components of the RNA silencing machinery. Finally, the biotechnological applications of silencing suppression have been considered.

An Overview of Antiviral RNA Silencing in Plant: Biogenesis, Host–Virus Interaction and Potential Applications

Approaches to Plant Stress and their Management, 2013

Small RNA molecules play a crucial regulatory role in maintaining genome stability as well as developmental regulations through a set of complex and partially overlapping pathways in a wide range of eukaryotic organisms. Active in both cytoplasm and nucleus, RNA interference regulates eukaryotic gene expression through transcriptional repression by epigenetic modification and interaction with transcription machinery. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs/miRNAs) of 21-24 nucleotides constitute the innate defence arm against a variety of pathogens, especially viruses. Plant viruses with either DNA or RNA genomes are subjected to small RNA-directed RNA degradation. Additionally, DNA viruses are subjected to another line of defence through 'RNA-directed DNA methylations' (RdDM). On the other hand, viral-encoded proteins, called silencing suppressors (VSRs), are known to counter the defence machinery, and therefore the virus can evade the host surveillance system. Some plant viruses additionally adopt certain strategies like acquiring silencing resistant structures (some RNA virus) to evade the RNA silencing machinery and thereby shaping the viral as well as the host genome. Recently, it has been reported that particular viral proteins and viral siRNAs contribute directly to pathogenicity by interacting with certain host proteins or RNAs. Transcriptional regulation of host gene by small RNA of viral origin plays important role in pathogenesis and symptom development. Small regulatory RNAs of cellular rather than pathogen origin have also been found to play a broad role in improving the basal defence in the case of plant-virus interaction. This chapter provides key insights into the complex intricate machinery of diverse RNA silencing mechanisms, describes various evolutionary diverse strategies of viral

Viral RNase3 Co-Localizes and Interacts with the Antiviral Defense Protein SGS3 in Plant Cells

PLOS ONE, 2016

Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV; family Closteroviridae) encodes a Class 1 RNase III endoribonuclease (RNase3) that suppresses post-transcriptional RNA interference (RNAi) and eliminates antiviral defense in sweetpotato plants (Ipomoea batatas). For RNAi suppression, RNase3 cleaves double-stranded small interfering RNAs (ds-siRNA) and long dsRNA to fragments that are too short to be utilized in RNAi. However, RNase3 can suppress only RNAi induced by sense RNA. Sense-mediated RNAi involves host suppressor of gene silencing 3 (SGS3) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6). In this study, subcellular localization and host interactions of RNase3 were studied in plant cells. RNase3 was found to interact with SGS3 of sweetpotato and Arabidopsis thaliana when expressed in leaves, and it localized to SGS3/RDR6 bodies in the cytoplasm of leaf cells and protoplasts. RNase3 was also detected in the nucleus. Co-expression of RNase3 and SGS3 in leaf tissue enhanced the suppression of RNAi, as compared with expression of RNase3 alone. These results suggest additional mechanisms needed for efficient RNase3-mediated suppression of RNAi and provide new information about the subcellular context and phase of the RNAi pathway in which RNase3 realizes RNAi suppression.

RNA Silencing and Plant Viral Diseases

Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®, 2012

RNA silencing plays a critical role in plant resistance against viruses, with multiple silencing factors participating in antiviral defense. Both RNA and DNA viruses are targeted by the small RNA-directed RNA degradation pathway, with DNA viruses being also targeted by RNA-directed DNA methylation. To evade RNA silencing, plant viruses have evolved a variety of counter-defense mechanisms such as expressing RNA-silencing suppressors or adopting silencing-resistant RNA structures. This constant defense–counter defense arms race is likely to have played a major role in defining viral host specificity and in shaping viral and possibly host genomes. Recent studies have provided evidence that RNA silencing also plays a direct role in viral disease induction in plants, with viral RNA-silencing suppressors and viral siRNAs as potentially the dominant players in viral pathogenicity. However, questions remain as to whether RNA silencing is the principal mediator of viral pathogenicity or if o...

Inhibition of 3' modification of small RNAs in virus-infected plants require spatial and temporal co-expression of small RNAs and viral silencing-suppressor proteins.

Plant viruses are inducers and targets of RNA silencing. Viruses counteract with RNA silencing by expressing silencing-suppressor proteins. Many of the identified proteins bind siRNAs, which prevents assembly of silencing effector complexes, and also interfere with their 3’ methylation, which protects them against degradation. Here, we investigated the 3’ modification of silencing-related small RNAs in Nicotiana benthamiana plants infected with viruses expressing RNA silencing suppressors, the p19 protein of Carnation Italian ringspot virus (CIRV) and HC-Pro of Tobacco etch virus (TEV). We found that CIRV had only a slight effect on viral siRNA 3’ modification, but TEV significantly inhibited the 3’ modification of si/miRNAs. We also found that p19 and HC-Pro were able to bind both 3’ modified and non-modified small RNAs in vivo. The findings suggest that the 3’ modification of viral siRNAs occurs in the cytoplasm, though miRNA 3’ modification likely takes place in the nucleus as well. Both silencing suppressors inhibited the 3’ modification of si/miRNAs when they and small RNAs were transiently co-expressed, suggesting that the inhibition of si/miRNA 3’modification requires spatial and temporal co-expression. Finally, our data revealed that a HEN1-like methyltransferase might account for the small RNA modification at the their 3’-terminal nucleotide in N. benthamiana.

Elimination of antiviral defense by viral RNase III

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009

Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) is an important subsistence and famine reserve crop grown in developing countries where Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV; Closteroviridae), a singlestranded RNA (ssRNA) crinivirus, synergizes unrelated viruses in co-infected sweet potato plants. The most severe disease and yield losses are caused by co-infection with SPCSV and a potyvirus, Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV; Potyviridae). Potyviruses synergize unrelated viruses by suppression of RNA silencing with the P1/HC-Pro polyprotein; however, the SPCSV-SPFMV synergism is unusual in that the potyvirus is the beneficiary. Our data show that transformation of an SPFMV-resistant sweet potato variety with the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-specific class 1 RNA endoribonuclease III (RNase3) of SPCSV broke down resistance to SPFMV, leading to high accumulation of SPFMV antigen and severe disease symptoms similar to the synergism in plants co-infected with SPCSV and SPFMV. RNase3-transgenic sweet potatoes also accumulated higher concentrations of 2 other unrelated viruses and developed more severe symptoms than non-transgenic plants. In leaves, RNase3 suppressed ssRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) in an endonuclease activity-dependent manner. It cleaved synthetic double-stranded small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of 21, 22, and 24 bp in vitro to products of approximately 14 bp that are inactive in RNAi. It also affected total siRNA isolated from SPFMVinfected sweet potato plants, suggesting a viral mechanism for suppression of RNAi by cleavage of siRNA. Results implicate RNase3 in suppression of antiviral defense in sweet potato plants and reveal RNase3 as a protein that mediates viral synergism with several unrelated viruses, a function previously described only for P1/HC-Pro. plant virus ͉ RNA silencing ͉ suppression of RNAi ͉ viral synergism SI. Detailed experimental procedures are described in SI Materials and Methods.

Double-stranded RNA binding may be a general plant RNA viral strategy to suppress RNA silencing

Journal of …, 2006

In plants, RNA silencing (RNA interference) is an efficient antiviral system, and therefore successful virus infection requires suppression of silencing. Although many viral silencing suppressors have been identified, the molecular basis of silencing suppression is poorly understood. It is proposed that various suppressors inhibit RNA silencing by targeting different steps. However, as double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) play key roles in silencing, it was speculated that dsRNA binding might be a general silencing suppression strategy. Indeed, it was shown that the related aureusvirus P14 and tombusvirus P19 suppressors are dsRNA-binding proteins. Interestingly, P14 is a size-independent dsRNA-binding protein, while P19 binds only 21-nucleotide ds-sRNAs (small dsRNAs having 2-nucleotide 3 overhangs), the specificity determinant of the silencing system. Much evidence supports the idea that P19 inhibits silencing by sequestering silencing-generated viral ds-sRNAs. In this study we wanted to test the hypothesis that dsRNA binding is a general silencing suppression strategy. Here we show that many plant viral silencing suppressors bind dsRNAs. Beet yellows virus Peanut P21, clump virus P15, Barley stripe mosaic virus ␥B, and Tobacco etch virus HC-Pro, like P19, bind ds-sRNAs size-selectively, while Turnip crinkle virus CP is a size-independent dsRNA-binding protein, which binds long dsRNAs as well as ds-sRNAs. We propose that size-selective ds-sRNA-binding suppressors inhibit silencing by sequestering viral ds-sRNAs, whereas size-independent dsRNA-binding suppressors inactivate silencing by sequestering long dsRNA precursors of viral sRNAs and/or by binding ds-sRNAs. The findings that many unrelated silencing suppressors bind dsRNA suggest that dsRNA binding is a general silencing suppression strategy which has evolved independently many times.

A plant RNA virus suppresses RNA silencing through viral RNA replication

The EMBO Journal, 2005

RNA interference (RNAi) is a post-transcriptional generegulatory mechanism that operates in many eukaryotes. RNAi is induced by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and is mainly involved in defence against transposons and viruses. To counteract RNAi, viruses have RNAi suppressors. Here we show a novel mechanism of RNAi suppression by a plant virus Red clover necrotic mosaic virus (RCNMV). To suppress RNAi, RCNMV needs multiple viral components, which include viral RNAs and putative RNA replicase proteins. A close relationship between the RNA elements required for negative-strand RNA synthesis and RNAi suppression suggests a strong link between the viral RNA replication machinery and the RNAi machinery. In a transient assay, RCNMV interferes with the accumulation of small-interfering RNA (siRNAs) in RNAi induced by a hairpin dsRNA and it also interferes with microRNA (miRNA) biogenesis. An Arabidopsis dcl1 mutant showed reduced susceptibility to RCNMV infection. Based on these results, we propose a model in which, to replicate, RCNMV deprives the RNAi machinery of Dicer-like enzymes that are involved in both siRNA and miRNA biogenesis. The EMBO Journal VOL 24 | NO 17 | 2005 EMBO THE EMBO JOURNAL THE EMBO JOURNAL Viral RNA replication complex suppresses RNAi A Takeda et al &