Three Essential Resources for Philosophy: Stanford Encyclopedia, Google Scholar and PhilPapers (original) (raw)
Related papers
Searching for Philosophy: A Review of Google Scholar and Google News
First Paragraph: Though the Internet has been around since the Sixties, the world-wide web is now only ten years old. In that time, it has seen unprecedented growth. Currently, Google searches more than eight billion web pages globally. Of course, without such search tools, a user would have difficulty finding anything of value. But even with them, finding academic scholarship remains a problem.
Electronic Research and Indexing Databases in Philosophy
American Library Association (Midwinter meeting), 2006
In these remarks I want to offer some thoughts on the available electronic research tools in philosophy. I believe the scope of the published literature in philosophy is such that thorough research can only be pursued with the use of a computer, and the most important electronic research tool remains the indexing database. At the same time bibliographic databases of all kinds are under growing pressure from Google and various library sites that are making ever larger collections of tables of contents and other bibliographic information freely available online. What is the continuing rationale for paying for an indexing database with no fulltext when large amounts of bibliographic data are freely available? This question seems most likely to lead to change in clearly defined disciplines such as philosophy where the borders of the field are relatively well established and the market is relatively small. I believe there is a continuing place for bibliographic databases in philosophy but not in their current form. There are four major indexing databases in philosophy and I will provide information about each, with a particular focus on The Philosopher's Index because I'm most familiar with it. I will show that none of these products is sufficient to support original research in philosophy and conclude by suggesting what needs to be done in their stead going forward.
Journal of Scientometric Research
In search of evidence for Wikipedia credibility, this study aims to compare and analyze articles' references of Wikipedia and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. This research approach is quantitative and has been done using bibliometric methods and citation analysis. The statistical sample of the research were 5% of the SEP entries (84 from 1685) and their equals on Wikipedia. The samples were selected randomly and systematically, then their references were analyzed and compared. The findings showed that the frequency of SEP references was about 3.5 times more than Wikipedia. The overlap of two encyclopedia's references was 2.47% of the total references. The half-life of the SEP references was significantly longer than Wikipedia. In both encyclopedias, the main resources which were used included books, journals, and websites. Regarding language of references, most of the references of both encyclopedias was in English, and citations to other language resources in both encyclopedias were almost similar. The percentage of open access and inaccessible resources on Wikipedia was higher than the SEP, while the percentage of non-open access references in the SEP was higher than Wikipedia. Finally, a comparison of the citations received by the two encyclopedia articles' references showed that the citations received by Wikipedia references were significantly higher than SEP. This article compares the similarity of two known encyclopedias through comparison of their entities' references. Despite the similarities in the referencing pattern of the two encyclopedias, their information content comes from different resources and comparison articles' references of Wikipedia with SEP provide no evidence for Wikipedia's credibility.
Online Information Review, 2008
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to revisit Google Scholar.Design/methodology/approachThis paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Google Scholar.FindingsThe Google Books project has given a massive and valuable boost to the already rich and diverse content of Google Scholar. The downside of the growth is that significant gaps remain for top ranking journals and serials, and the number of duplicate, triplicate and quadruplicate records for the same source documents (which Google Scholar cannot detect reliably) has increased.Originality/valueThis paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Google Scholar.
Teaching Philosophy, 1977
Over 2100 lengthy articles with extensive bibliographies on every aspect of Eastern and Western philosophy, ancient, medieval, and modern.
This paper paper talks about general Philosophy and why it needs to be studied. It also answers the questions of how an ordinary life is lived by everyone based on the concerns of practical men, and lastly, why Philosophy is a shame for others.
Talia: A framework for philosophy scholars
Proceedings of Semantic …, 2007
In this paper we present Talia, a novel implementation of a semantic digital web library system, which is part of the Discovery project. Talia deploys Semantic Web technologies and uses computational ontologies for the organisation of knowledge, which can help the denition of a state-of-the-art research and publishing environment for philosophy. Talia will provide an innovative and exible system which enables data interoperability and new paradigms for information enrichment, data-retrieval and navigation.
Google Scholar's Contribution to Scholarly Pursuits: A Comprehensive Overview
Digital Transformation in Libraries and Information Centres (pp. 193-211), Today & Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers, New Delhi, India, 2023
The quest for searching and retrieving authentic information is of great importance for scholars. With the growing dominance of Google Scholar as a first-stop resource for scholars and researchers, an investigation of its influence on citation patterns, freedom of information, and scholarly communication is necessary. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of Google Scholar and its potential benefits for academics and researchers in various fields of research. The objectives of this research are to explore the ways in which Google Scholar can assist researchers in locating relevant scholarly works worldwide, to identify its limitations as a research tool, and to suggest potential areas for improvement of the Google Scholar platform. This study breaks new ground in understanding the various versions of Google Scholar indexes, correlations between the number of Google Scholar versions and citation counts, and the value of Institutional Repositories for increasing scholarly impact. This paper investigates Google Scholar versions as an alternative source for a scholarly article. While other articles have looked at Google Scholar through various lenses, the authors believe this specific aspect of the topic has not been previously explored. This article provides information about conducting a literature search on the Google Scholar website. The article briefly describes how to narrow or expand a search and how to find non-journal literature. Although Google Scholar is not without limitations, it offers a practical starting point for a literature search.
Notes on Philosophy, 2024
Embark on an intellectual journey with Notes on Philosophy, where Miguel Goede guides you through philosophical thought's vast and intricate landscape. This comprehensive guide offers a captivating overview of the key ideas, figures, and movements that have shaped philosophy from its ancient origins to contemporary discussions. Dive into the Building Blocks of Philosophy to unravel the essentials of ontology, epistemology, and ethics. Explore Ancient and Medieval Philosophy to understand the profound contributions of classical thinkers like Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle and medieval scholars who intertwined philosophy with theology. Expand your horizons with Eastern Philosophy, delving into the rich traditions of Indian, Chinese, and Middle Eastern philosophies. Witness the intellectual revival during the Renaissance in Making Progress, where humanism and scientific inquiry began to redefine philosophical boundaries. Encounter revolutionary ideas in Modern Philosophy, addressing new fields of thought such as psychology, sociology, and anthropology, and grappling with contemporary logic and existential questions. Finally, explore the present with Knowledge Now, where postmodern critiques, the rise of feminism, and ongoing philosophical shifts come to the forefront. Notes on Philosophy is crafted for both newcomers and seasoned philosophers. Its clear and accessible introductions to complex concepts make it an invaluable resource for students, curious readers, and anyone passionate about understanding the questions that have captivated thinkers for centuries. Join Miguel Goede in this enlightening adventure and discover how philosophy continues to shape our understanding of the world today.