The Transcendental Movements in America (original) (raw)

Transcendentalism

transcendentalism, 2021

Transcendentalism Transcendentalism, called as American Enlightenment by someone, aroused in the scope of religion, philosophy and as a literary movement between the years 1830s and 60s in New England. The cities such as Concord, Philadelphia which were freer than other states were home to transcendentalists. In this movement, people thought that each individual has the same soul with the world, and even they are cast in the same mould with the world. This movement was based on a belief which defends that the world and the God has the same unity. However, It contains Deism which recquires an uninvolved god. Pioneers of transcendentalism seperate God's existance from the holly books and they attributed the logic and reason. They give importance to the self. Self-assurance and individuality doctrines flourished with the belief that God incarnates with the individual soul. The terms such as individuality, self, liberation showed itself in the work of writers such as

Transcendentalism as a Special Type of Philosophizing and the Transcendental Paradigm of Philosophy (XII International Kant's Congress 'Nature and Freedom'; draft)

In the paper we have attempted to consider Kant’s transcendental philosophy as a special type of philosophizing and the new transcendental paradigm, which differs from both the ‘object’ metaphysics of Antiquity and ‘subject’ metaphysics of the Modern Age (transcendent — transcendental — immanent metaphysics). For this purpose we shall introduce the methodological terms ‘transcendental shift’ and ‘transcendental perspective’. The basis for such representation of transcendentalism is the cognitive and semantic reading of the Critique and theory of ‘two aspects’. While in classical metaphysics cognition is interpreted as a relation between empirical subject and object, in transcendental metaphysics (perspective) ‘possible experience’ (Erfahrung) shall be understood as a relation between ‘consciousness generally’ (transcendental subject) and ‘thing-in- general’ (transcendental object). In this, Kant’s transcendentalism, in contrast to classical contemplative metaphysics, acts as an ‘experimental’ metaphysics and the transcendentality is defined as the intermediate between the immanent and transcendent ontological area (as a “instrumental” component of our cognition).

Immanuel Kant’s turn to transcendental philosophy

2014

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notices Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.

Transcendentalism as the Special Type of Philosophizing and Transcendental Paradigm of Philosophy

2018

In the paper we have attempted to consider Kant’s transcendental philosophy as a special type of philosophizing and the new transcendental paradigm, which differs from both the ‘object’ metaphysics of Antiquity and ‘subject’ metaphysics of the Modern Age (transcendent — transcendental — immanent metaphysics). For this purpose we shall introduce the methodological terms ‘transcendental shift’ and ‘transcendental perspective’. The basis for such representation of transcendentalism is the cognitive and semantic reading of the Critique and theory of ‘two aspects’. While in classical metaphysics cognition is interpreted as a relation between empirical subject and object, in transcendental metaphysics (perspective) ‘possible experience’ (Erfahrung) shall be understood as a relation between ‘consciousness generally’ (transcendental subject) and ‘thing-in-general’ (transcendental object). In this, Kant’s transcendentalism, in contrast to classical contemplative metaphysics. acts as an ‘expe...

The Views Rationalism and Idealism Transcendental Concept Empirisne by

Kant argues, Metaphysics is it possible or not to extend our knowledge of reality? Is Metaphysics could provide certain knowledge of God, freedom, and immortality? This question obviously is a doubt on the truth of Metaphysics that ever is queen sciences, because in reality, Metaphysics, unlike physics, does not have a reliable method to solve the problem. Contradict his claims to a system of systems. At issue in Metaphysics is an attempt to produce 'a priori knowledge' or 'pure knowledge'. Kant's view of criticism Began on or before the merger between the schools of philosophy pioneered by rationalism and empiricism Rene Descartes pioneered by David Hume, and Kant has three very important work of the critique of pure ratio, the ratio of the critique of practical, criticism of consideration. This is the third work that greatly influenced later philosophers thought, who would not want to use Kant's thought.

Movements of the World: The Sources of Transcendental Philosophy

2012

A great difference is made to contemporary accounts of transcendental philosophy if the question is raised as to how far down its inquiries into the sources of cognitions extend. It is true that the transcendental deduction is designed to reset the orbit of metaphysics around experiences rather than things; and although there are exceptions, neither Kant nor his successor transcendentalists ceased to extend the inquiry into the ultimate grounds of cognition insofar as these are made possible not by objectives, but by what exceeds their being, that is, their formation. Indeed, it is in thinking sources, in descendence, that transcendental philosophy most achieves its objects.