Europe at the Epicenter of National Politics: The Attitudes of Greek Political Elites Towards the European Union and the Economic Crisis (original) (raw)
Related papers
What Greek political elites think about Europe and the crisis? An exploratory analysis
In this paper the views of a sample of 74 Greek Members of Parliament (MPs) on European integration and the handling of the economic crisis by the EU are discussed and interpreted. The survey of MPs, which was conducted in 2014, is a replication of a comparable study conducted in 2007. Greek MPs continue to be attached to Europe, but evaluate negatively EU’s institutions’ role during the economic crisis. Overall, three groups of parliamentarians, namely pro-government MPs, parliamentarians self-placed at the centre of the left-right spectrum and more experienced MPs, tended to have more pro-European views and attitudes than MPs of the opposition, left-wing MPs and less experienced MPs. The dominant dimension of conflict for Greek political elites is the issue of the Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs). The SYRIZA-ANEL government that was formed after the January 2015 elections was not a surprise given the close proximity of these two parties on their stance towards the MoUs and the EU.
Perceptions of the European Union in crisis: The case of Greece
Leuven : KU Leuven. Faculteit Letteren, 2021
This Master’s Thesis argues the research question of what generates the perception of the European Union in times of crises and why. Taking the example of Greece, the research addresses the people’s and political parties' understanding of the EU’s intervention before, during, and after the financial debt crisis and the economic, sociopolitical, and cultural factors that have affected it. Thus, by deepening the timeline of the crisis, it focuses on the Eurosceptic tendencies emerging and their influence on Greece's public opinion. Those tendencies are analyzed through the theoretical spectrum of cosmopolitanism and communitarianism as parallels of pro-Europeanism and Euroscepticism, in comparison with the left-right cleavage, towards the trust (or lack thereof) in the Union and its intervention during the crisis. Moreover, this thesis mainly concentrates on the Eurosceptic influence of the radical-left and extreme-right, the effects of the 2015 referendum, the people’s perception of the hypothetical scenario of Grexit, their vulnerability towards populism, and the creation of the anti-austerity political cleavage. The research design will follow the methodological approach of comparing the two tendencies to the aforementioned theoretical spectrum, using quantitative research on the public’s opinion regarding the EU, interviews with key persons, election results, and different political parties' claims. To conclude, this thesis connects Euroscepticism in Greece with the overall legitimacy and democracy crisis of the EU.
‘The Greek Left vis-à-vis the EU: From opposition to accommodation and back again’
This paper studies the position of the main currents of the Greek Left vis-à-vis the European integration project. The first part analyses the politico-economic nature of this project and the main phases of its evolution. Its main argument is that it is an attempt to create a European imperialist bloc in the beginning as an ally to the US versus the Eastern Bloc but – particularly after the collapse of the latter – as an increasingly aggressive competitor to the US for imperialist primacy. The second part studies the relationship of Greek capitalism with the European integration project. Its central thesis is that Greek capital (being a second generation, middle level one with limited imperialist abilities) found in the accession to the European integration project its modern ‘Big Idea’ : it considered that its partnership with the more developed western European capitalisms – however unequal maybe - would signify its ascent in the world imperialist hierarchy. This plan, which passed through several stages, is going completely astray today with Greece’s severe crisis and the imposition of the IMF-EU-ECB Memoranda. In order to substantiate this thesis, a concise presentation of the economic consequences of Greece’s accession first to the EEC and then to EU and EMU is being presented. The third part surveys the position of the three main currents of the Greek Left but also of the other political forces vis-à-vis the EU. It is shown that the majority of the Greek Left (orthodox communist, radical and anti-capitalist Left etc.) – together with PASOK and with the exception of the eurocommunists – opposed vehemently the accession to the EU. However, once it the latter took place, PASOK and parts of the Left accommodated – openly or silently – with it. This was related to several EU economic initiatives (aid packages, agricultural policy etc.) which – although terribly inefficient and ultimately disastrous for the Greek economy – created a popular appeal. However, the eruption of the 2007-8 economic crisis and the subsequent Greek crisis overturned all these as anti-EU feeling and positions prevailed in the Greek society despite the vociferous resistance of the Greek politico-economic establishment. This led to a return of the older Left anti-EU position which became dominant in the Greek Left. A survey is offered of the current politico-economic positions of the main currents and parties of the Greek Left vis-à-vis the EU. Their also a particular focus on the role of the Euro and the EMU is the current Greek politico-economic controversies. The last part concludes by presenting the argument for a Left opposition to the EU and an alternative to the IMF-EU-ECB Memoranda program founded on a strategy of disengagement from both the EU and the EMU. The main political and economic aspects of such a program are being analysed.
Stalled Europeanization in Post-Sovereignty EU? Greek Politics in Hard Times
This paper focuses on stalled Europeanization as a field of practices, institutions and discourse connected with a process of ambivalent reform. The absence of a consensual national strategy of adaptation to a particularly challenging environment, i.e., participation in the eurozone, produced dramatic consequences when confronted with the financial crisis after 2009. It is argued that the country’s sluggish Europeanization reached a critical turning point in 2009 when the urgency of the crisis brought to the fore a number of issues and vulnerabilities. Asymmetric policy adjustment – limited in some areas, extensive in others – has been the combined result of perceived necessity, insufficiently designed and implemented reform packages, party-political repositioning, and plain politicking. Europeanization in Greece became a stalled process in 2015; restarting the stalled process since 2016 leads to ongoing but sluggish Europeanizing interactions, involving shifts in the roles of domestic politics, institutional traditions and interest groups while reshaping the patterns of political contestation.
Policy Paper, 2015
Drawing on FRAGMEX’s second Work Package other research reports and new data from Eurobarometer surveys and opinion polls from the polling company Public Issue, this paper documents the emergence of a normative/ discursive rift in the Greek public sphere, whereby the EU and Germany in particular, are distinguished as largely responsible for the crisis suffered by the Greeks. The EU is held responsible because of its inability to resist Germany’s domination and display a more solidary face to Greece; Germany for being a privileged economic superpower, which dictates a harsh economic policy that serves its own national interests. In this context, aggressive public discourse against both the EU and particularly Germany has been articulated by both politicians and the general public. More generally, the paper documents an outbreak of Euroscepticism in Greece, as well as a gap between elites’ and the general public’s attitudes towards the EU, with the latter feeling much more alienated and untrusting of the EU, than the former. Nonetheless, the analysis also shows that while disappointed, Greeks do not reject the EU and still want their country to be part of the European integration project. Indeed, it could be said that a positive message that emerges from the analysis, is that the criticism leveled against the EU, is not that EU has gone too far, but on the contrary, that integration has not gone far enough, in order to guarantee a more efficient and just crisis management mechanism.
The Abduction of Europa: Europeanism and Euroscepticism in Greece, 1974–2015
Rethinking Democratisation in Spain, Greece and Portugal, 2019
This chapter examines Greek Euroscepticism both at party and popular level from the country’s accession to the EC in 1981 to the signing of the Maastricht Treaty, by analysing the data from the biannual Eurobarometer surveys and the reading of parliamentary debates and the press. This diverse source base will allow the investigation of the forms through which the “framing” of Europe took place within the political and public discourse, and the impact the framing had on attitudes towards European integration. The interdisciplinary approach taken here will allow us to move beyond an interest-based approach and to investigate the diverse ways the EU was framed and understood as a political, cultural and economic project; how the EU gained and lost legitimacy; as well as the expectations and beliefs in the rise and fall of support for Greek EC membership.
This dissertation sets out to critically evaluate the Greek position as a nation-state, as well as the implications and benefits it has being a member of the European Union. The theoretical foundation that lies at the base of my dissertation, is one of the realist school of thought. The trending views in realism regarding the importance of International Organizations, such as the European Union, are divided into two parts. One is the idea that an International Organization only works in favor of the strongest member state, and all other members only serve as peons. Thus the smaller members states will never benefit fully from being involved in an International Organization, as their national agenda will not be prioritized, except if it coincides with the national interests of the largest member state.
Representation and Austerity Politics: Attitudes of Greek Voters and Elites Compared
South European Society and Politics [DOI:10.1080/13608746.2014.977478], 2014
Drawing on surveys of voters and MPs in Greece, this article analyses elite-mass interaction on key policy (austerity, European integration, immigration) and ideological issues after the 2012 elections. We find that while for the government parties, New Democracy and PASOK, the level of congruence is quite high, MPs from opposition parties (SYRIZA, Golden Dawn) place themselves in more exposed positions in comparison with their voters. The observed substantial variation in the intensity and direction of congruence, across parties and issue preferences in Greece, reinforces the view that the dimensionality of political contestation is not reducible to a single ideological dimension.