Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves (original) (raw)
Related papers
A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2002
Surgical damage to the pelvic autonomic nerves during radical hysterectomy is thought to be responsible for considerable morbidity, i.e., impaired bladder function, defecation problems, and sexual dysfunction. Previous anatomical studies and detailed study of surgical techniques in various Japanese oncology centers demonstrated that the anatomy of the pelvic autonomic nerve plexus permits a systematic surgical approach to preserve these nerves during radical hysterectomy without compromising radicality. We introduced elements of the Japanese nerve-preserving techniques and carried out a feasibility study in ten consecutive Dutch patients. The technique involved three steps: first, the identification and preservation of the hypogastric nerve in a loose tissue sheath underneath the ureter and lateral to the sacro-uterine ligaments; second, the inferior hypogastric plexus in the parametrium is lateralized and avoided during parametrial transsection; third, the most distal part of the inferior hypogastric plexus is preserved during the dissection of the posterior part of the vesico-uterine ligament. The clinical study showed that the procedure is feasible and safe, except possibly when used with very obese patients and patients with broad, bulky tumors. Surgical preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves in radical hysterectomy deserves consideration in the quest to improve both cure and quality of life in cervical cancer patients.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2006
The objectives were to describe our nerve-sparing class III radical hysterectomy technique and assess the feasibility and safety of the procedure as well as its impact on voiding function. From January to August 2005, 21 consecutive patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer and 1 patient with clinical stage II endometrial cancer underwent nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. The transurethral catheter was removed on the seventh postoperative day. Then intermittent self-catheterization was performed and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) was recorded. The nerve-sparing procedure was completed successfully and safely in all of the patients. Eight (36%) and 6 (27%) patients had the PVR of < 100 ml and < 50 ml respectively at the initial removal of the catheter. On the fourteenth day, 82% and 77% of the patients had the PVR of < 100 ml and < 50 ml, respectively. The mean duration before the PVR became < 50 ml was 11.27 (5-26) days. In conclusion, the technique described in this preliminary study appears safe, adequate, and feasible in our population with satisfactory recovery of voiding function. A larger comparative study is needed on long-term urinary, bowel, and sexual function as well as recurrence and survival.
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2017
Objectives: Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer was introduced to improve quality of life after treatment. Sparing the pelvic autonomic nerves reduces bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. The Leiden nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) was modified to the Swift procedure, the latter being more radical regarding the sacrouterine and parametrial resection. We investigate whether nerve-sparing surgery has comparable oncological outcomes as the conventional radical hysterectomy (CRH). Concurrently, we investigate whether there is a difference regarding the oncological outcomes of the 2 nerve-sparing techniques. Methods: This is a single-center, observational prospective cohort study analyzing oncological outcomes in women undergoing CRH (1994Y1999), LNSRH (2001Y2005), or Swift procedure (2006Y2010) for early stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IA2YIIA). Results: Three hundred sixty-three patients (124 CRH, 122 LNSRH, and 117 Swift) were included. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2 or higher (P = 0.005) was significantly more prevalent in the CRH cohort. The 5-year pelvic relapseYfree survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the 3 cohorts (P = 0.116). Regarding the nerve-sparing cohorts, the Swift cohort showed a significant better 5-year overall survival (87.2%) compared with the LNSRH cohort (78.8%) (P = 0.04). In the LNSRH cohort, resection planes less than 5 mm free and need for adjuvant therapy were significantly higher than in the Swift cohort (P = 0.026 and 0.046, respectively). Conclusions: The nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy shows a similar oncological outcome compared with the CRH. The more radical Swift version of nerve-sparing techniques is preferable to the former LNSRH procedure.
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and the legacy of Japanese school
2015
The concept of radicalism has been reshaping first in the rationalization of surgical procedures. For example, in endometrial cancer limited to corpus uterine , and early vulvar cancer routine lymphadenectomy is unnecessary in about 85% of cases. Thanks to the sentinel node biopsy today it is possible to indicate such intervention only in necessary cases. In the same way is has been rethinking radical surgery in the extent of resection of the primary tumor in many pathologies. Clear resection margins have been modified and constantly refined the criteria for having surgery enough but keeping much of the functionality in risk and decreasing post-operative sequelae.
Anticancer research, 2012
To analyze pelvic dysfunctions, quality of life, and survival after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) compared to classical radical hysterectomy (RH) for cervical cancer. All cervical cancer patients undergoing a RH or a NSRH were evaluated for pelvic dysfunctions and filled in a quality-of-life questionnaire. A total of 56 women were included; 31 underwent RH (group 1) and 25 NSRH (group 2). Postoperatively, a higher number of patients had urinary incontinence (p=0.02), urinary retention (p=0.01), faecal incontinence (p=0.01) and constipation (p=0.01) in group 1 versus group 2. Patients referred a higher rate of severe sexual dysfunction after RH compared to NSRH (p=0.03). No differences were found in orgasmic frequency and sexual desire; overall quality of life evaluation was more satisfactory after NSRH. NSRH conferred a better clinical outcome with fewer long-term bladder, colorectal and sexual complications. Post-operative quality of life after NSRH was better, with the...
Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer
Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) was introduced with the aim to reduce pelvic dysfunctions related to conventional radical hysterectomy (RH). Here, we sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of NSRH in a relatively large number of the patients of cervical cancer (CC) patients undergoing either primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery. Outcomes of consecutive patients undergoing NSRH and of a historical cohort of patients undergoing conventional RH were retrospectively reviewed. This study included 325 (49.8%) and 327 (50.2%) undergoing NSRH and RH, respectively. Via a multivariable model, nodal status was the only factor predicting for DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.17-3.73; p=0.01). A trend towards high risk of recurrence was observed for patients affected by locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing NACT followed by surgery (HR=2.57; 95% CI=0.95-6.96; p=0.06). Type of surgical procedures (NSRH vs. R...
Feasibility and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy
Zagazig university medical journal, 2018
Aim: Evaluation of the feasibility of laparoscopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in comparison to the nonnerve sparing type. Methodology:Patient recruitment started from November 2014 to November 2016, patients who underwent laparoscopic type C1 hysterectomy and laparoscopic type C2 hysterectomy according to Querleu-Morrow classification(1) at our departments were prospectively evaluated. The inclusion criteria included: Patients with cervical carcinoma Stage IA2 to stage IIB cervical cancer according to FIGO staging and Stage II-III endometrial cancer with cervical involvement according to FIGO staging. Postoperative drainage of the bladder through a Foley catheter was maintained for 2 days and removed on the third day and the patients were asked to perform spontaneous voiding every 3 hours followed immediately by drainage of the bladder by urinary catheter to assess the post void residual (PVR) urine volume. The procedure was repeated until the PVR is less than 100 ml. The voiding function was considered normal when the patient had 2 consecutive measurements of PVR urine less than 100 ml and abnormal if the patient had a PVR urine more than 100 ml with need of self-catheterization after 4 weeks from the date of surgery. Results:46 patients were included in the study, 30 patients underwent type C1 LNSRH (Group A) and 16 patients underwent type C2 LRH (Group B). The mean age was 49.1±13.1 and 51.2±11.8, median BMI was 26.2(22.9-28.5) and 23.8(21-26.6) respectively for the 2 groups. The mean operative time was 240.1±65.5 in group A and 308.1±83 in group B (P value=0.004). The rate of intraoperative complications was 10% in group A and 12.5% in group B. The median duration of postoperative catheterization until the PVR urine volume was less than 100 ml was 3.5(3-5) days in group A and 6(4-8.5) days in group B (P value=0.002), The rate of late postoperative complications including bladder dysfunction was 3.3% (Group A) and 31.25% (Group B) (P value 0.002). Conclusion:Our study results supported the feasibility of LNSRH technique with better functional outcome without compromising the oncologic safety of the procedure
The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2007
Radical hysterectomy has been performed for invasive cervical cancer, and autonomic nerve-sparing procedures have been developed to preserve bladder function. To perform and improve the nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy, it is important to understand anatomy of the intra pelvic fasciae, specially vesico-uterine ligament (VUL), because most of injuries to the nerves occurred during incision of the VUL in radical hysterectomy procedures. The objectives of the present study were to provide histological understanding of major structures found in nervesparing radical hysterectomy. Serial macroscopic slices (15-20 mm thick) from five female pelves were trimmed and prepared for paraffin-embedded histology. We noted an anatomical entity as "the visceroparietal fascial bridge", which corresponds with the macroscopically identified arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis. A histologically identifiable neurovascular pedicle to the bladder neck corresponded with the deep portion of VUL. These findings could help better preservation of autonomic nerves during radical hysterectomy and improve patient's quality of life after the operation. Translation of surgical anatomy into anatomic terminology enables us to have fruitful discussions with persuasive power by excluding any bias from individual surgeons. vesico-uterine ligament; paracolpium; parietal fascia; levator ani; radial hysterectomy; autonomic nerve