Flood preparedness initiatives of high-risk communities of Jakarta (original) (raw)

Community responses and adaptation strategies toward flood hazard in Jakarta, Indonesia

Natural Hazards, 2014

Jakarta, as the capital of the Republic of Indonesia, has long been known to be at risk from flood hazard. It is increasingly recognized that community responses and adaptation strategies are essential for planning future mitigation action. In order to investigate the community responses and adaptation strategies employed in Jakarta, indepth interviews were performed in the flood-prone areas. The results reveal that vulnerability to flooding is increasing, and it is linked to several factors: (1) stakeholders, (2) environment, (3) communities, and (4) infrastructure and its maintenance. Various physical adaptation strategies have been adopted by the local communities, which include raising the housing level, building terraced housing, and building small dikes to prevent water entering the settlements. Several non-physical adaptations were also identified from the fieldwork. These adaptations tend to be conducted through communal work and the reuse of resources and materials left undamaged by flooding. However, uncoordinated responses during flood events produce greater exposure to the hazard, and it can be inferred that community responses remain below the ideal. This study highlights the need for urgent attention to be given to improving the institutional links between stakeholders, especially at the municipal level, which could provide more efficient disaster response.

Understanding the Operational Concept of a Flood-Resilient Urban Community in Jakarta, Indonesia, from the Perspectives of Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation and Development Agencies

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019

Climate change-related extreme events such as floods have and will continue to present a great challenge to disaster risk management. There is a pressing need to develop a robust management strategy via enhancing the resiliency of the community, particularly in the context of complex urban environments, like Jakarta. Resilience is conceptualized within specific contexts and uniquely tailored to the targeted setting, yet research regarding the operational concept of a flood-resilient community in the context of Jakarta remains limited. This paper will elaborate this operational concept through understanding the desirable features and influential barriers of a flood-resilient community through the lenses of three main stakeholder groups: disaster risk reduction (DRR), climate change adaptation (CCA), and development. It will also discuss the ways in which the synergies that exist across these groups can be enhanced. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were applied in this stu...

Community-based Practices to Cope with Coastal and River Floods in Semarang City, Indonesia Aprillia FINDAYANI 2 Acknowledgment

Kyoto University, 2015

COMMUNITY-BASED PRACTICES TO COPE WITH COASTAL AND RIVER FLOODS IN SEMARANG CITY, INDONESIA Aprillia FINDAYANI Key Words: Community-based Practices, Coastal and River Floods 1. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Flood disaster, by number and economic losses, account for about a third of all natural catastrophes throughout the world. Semarang, as a waterfront city has been suffering from floods since historic time. Flooding within the city is still a major problem for the local government of Semarang City. Many areas in Semarang City, especially along the rivers and along the shore, are suffering from flooding. This research aims to capture people’s perception and response to two different kind of flood. The study focused on two objectives: the first main objective is to identify and analyze community response and its relation to their knowledge, preparedness and action level. The second objective is to propose a framework of community based-disaster education to enhance the resilience to flood. 2. METHODOLOGY This is an exploratory case study based on primary and secondary data. The primary data were collected through observational study, questionnaires, semi structured interviews, and focus group discussions. Literature review and contextual data from the Semarang city government were used as a secondary data. A sample size of 128 was chosen with 87 questionnaires administered to the respondents in coastal area, and 41 questionnaires administered to the respondents in riverside. The selection of respondents was based on purposive sampling methods. Semi structured interviews were conducted to Semarang Water Management Agency, Semarang Planning and Development Board, Semarang City Planning Agency, Head of District and Sub District Offices in research areas. 3. FINDINGS The findings of the study indicated that people in the coastal areas have a high level of knowledge about floods (64%). This knowledge is comparatively high on amount of their past experiences of floods; however they lack in preparedness (43%) because most of the residents are fishermen who have low income so they could not must much effort to adapt their building to flood. On the other hand, people in the inland, they lack in knowledge (18%) because flood is comparatively recent in their area; but they have a good level of preparedness (24%) because they belong to high and middle level income strata. Furthermore, both communities in the coastal area and inland have a high level of action because of a high knowledge and experience for coastal residents and a good preparedness for inland residents. 4. CONCLUSION This research leads to recommendation to improve the adaptive capacity of the people to cope with the floods. The recommendation is to develop Community-based Disaster Education (CBDE) Framework with the main purpose is to increase community knowledge about disaster and to enhance community resilience to flood. An active participation of the community, local government agency, community organization as well as schools is needed to reducing disaster risks through systematic efforts to analyze and manage the causal factors of disasters, including through reduced exposure to hazards, lessened vulnerability of people and property, wise management of land and the environment, and improved preparedness for adverse events as the part of Disaster Risk Reduction. Figure 1. Community-based Disaster Education framework

Ready to go? The importance of Being Prepared for Flood disaster

There is a growing awareness that disasters can strike anytime and anywhere. On an average, a disaster occurs in everyday somewhere in the world. Many developing countries, have limited preparedness for disaster response. Preparedness means preparing to handle an emergency and include plans or preparations made to save lives and to help response and rescue operations. If a disaster occurs in the community, local government and disaster-relief organizations will try to help the victim, but the victim itself needs to be ready as well. Local responders may not be able to reach the victim immediately, or they may need to focus their efforts elsewhere. The victim should also be ready to be self-sufficient for at least three days. This may mean providing for own shelter, first aid, food, water, and sanitation. This review paper aimed to study the impact of disaster preparedness, importance of preparedness in flood disaster, ways of emergency preparedness for flood disaster and benefits of preparedness for flood disaster. INTRODUCTION Increasing the incidence rate of disasters, including flood disaster around the world is one of the major threats to human health and life. Although the prevention of disaster is difficult, disaster preparedness and effective and timely response can minimize the devastating effects of disaster. Disaster preparedness is highly needed to handle these unpredictable situations effectively. To meet this aim, many personnel from various professionals need to support this plan of disaster preparedness [6].

Community Preparedness in Facing Flood Disaster in Martapura Timur District, Banjar Regency

The Innovation of Social Studies Journal

This study is to examine community preparedness as an effort to mitigate flood disasters. Research related to community preparedness in dealing with disasters is needed to manage disasters in the future. Thus, this is the first step in building a disaster-aware community. So that when a disaster occurs, the community has the attitude and ability to understand how to prepare for a flood disaster. This type of research is quantitative, with data analysis used with quantitative descriptive methods. Data collection is used by directly collecting the results of questionnaires prepared in advance to the public and collecting documents related to research variables using survey methods. The research was conducted in Martapura Timur District, Banjar Regency. This study analyzes the community s preparedness data in dealing with floods by using data analysis of the percentage of community preparedness to face flood disasters. Community preparedness is calculated based on an interval classific...

A community-based approach to flood hazard and vulnerability assessment in flood prone areas :: A case study in Kelurahan Sewu Surakarta City Indonesia

2010

Kelurahan Sewu of Surakarta City is located in a flood prone area. The largest flood inundation which occurred on the late December 2007 caused inundation on the entire village. Strengthening and raising public awareness of disaster-prone areas is necessary in order to reduce the vulnerability and risk. Community knowledge is very important to improve preparedness and mitigation to reduce impact due to flood. The research is focused on a local scale, and is based on community knowledge of, flood hazard, identify the element at risk, and assess the vulnerability of each of the elements at risk.

Qualitative study of disaster preparedness in an Indonesian village: Interviews with survivors of flash flooding near Bandung

Miscellanea Geographica

Debris flows and flash floods pose a continuing hazard to Nyalindung, a village in a mountainous part of West Java. On 16 December 2013, three days of heavy rain and a partial breaching of a succession of landslide dams triggered a debris flow and flash flood. One person died, nine homes were damaged, and 53 residents were evacuated. We asked villagers who were directly affected by that disaster about their knowledge of the hazard, in the hope of developing adaptation strategies. The survey showed that the majority of the villagers first became aware of the hazard during the 2013 disaster. Practical solutions exclude relocation because the village has stood in flow paths for the past 70 years or more, and because the families residing there are attached to the land and each other. We recommend combining public education about existing hazards with early warning technology.

Household Preparedness for Flood Disaster in Surakarta City 2017

GeoEco

This research case aims to determine (1) The spread of floods in the city of Surakarta in 2016; (2) Uncertainty factors that causing floods based on community perception in Surakarta City; (3) Individual and household preparedness levels in dealing with flood disaster in Surakarta City; (4) Implementation of science as a teaching material of geography in grade XI Senior High School on basic material of natural disaster mitigation. The research was conducted in Western City of Surakarta. The area assumed in Western City of Surakarta are Banjarsari district, Laweyan District, and Serengan District. Eligible samples consisted of 11 villages affected by flood in 2016, sampling of administrative unit using purposive sampling technique. The sample has been taken is the number of individuals / households in each 'RW' affected by floods in each villages, the number of samples is using snowball sampling technique. Data collection was done by documentation study, interview, questionnaire, and interview. Data validity test is done by data triangulation method. Data analysis is using Likert approach and LIPI preparedness measurement framework-UNESCO / ISDR. The results of the research are as follows: (1) flooding spread in eleven sub-districts in West Surakarta City which is divided into 3 regions based on administrative unit of analysis. Banjarsari District having local flood characteristics and submissions with elevation and duration of time falling into the low category. Laweyan District areas have local flood characteristics and postings with elevation and duration of time that falling into the low category. Serengan District has local flood characteristics and post with elevation and duration falling into the medium category; (2). Factors causing high flooding, garbage disposal, and flood control building conditions; (3) Individual and household preparedness studies in all villages are in a ready category;

What are the Essentials for Community Resilience against Recurring Floods?

International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology

Flood has become the recurring and prominent disaster risk in Indonesia's Capital Region, Jakarta. Heavy rain intensity merged with urban development issues, including urbanization, land subsidence, and water recharge land conversion causes the widening of flooded areas across Jakarta, Bekasi, Tangerang, and Depok. This causes the need for communities at risk to catch up in their institutional and non-institutional capacity to cope with the flood impacts during the rainy season each year. Thus, communities have learned to depend less on institutional capacities and invest in community resilience instead. This study assesses the community flood resilience factors found in current literature and compares them with the findings from community cases Kampung Melayu and Kebon Baru Urban Communities (Kelurahan) in Jakarta. This paper aims to validate and contrasts the key contributing factors to community resilience based on the literature and findings from flood-prone communities in two urban communities in Jakarta. Community resilience data were collected through town watching, interviews, and community engagement observation in two months. The study found that prominent factors for resilience within the community in these case study locations are leadership, activism, and volunteerism through periodic capacity building and community engagement activities across all sectors. Moreover, there is a need for mutual acknowledgment between community grassroots organizations and government authorities to enhance and accelerate resilience building. Keywords-Ciliwung River Basin; community resilience; urban neighborhoods; flood risk management; hydro-meteorological hazard.