Quality of surgery for rectal carcinoma: comparison between open and laparoscopic approaches (original) (raw)
Abstract
BACKGROUND Macroscopic evaluation of a tumor specimen is an independent prognostic factor of oncologic outcome after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. This study aimed to assess macroscopic quality of specimens acquired after laparoscopic versus open TME in patients with low rectal cancer.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
References (41)
- Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg 1982;69:613-6.
- McAnena OJ, Heald RJ, Lockhart-Mummery HE. Operative and func- tional results of total mesorectal excision with ultra-low anterior re- section in the management of carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:517-21.
- Arbman G, Nilsson E, Halbook O, et al. Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1995;82:375-9.
- McCall JL, Cox MR, Wattchow DA. Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:126 -32.
- McFarlane JK, Ryall RDH, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993;341:457-60.
- Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, et al. Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001;89:327-4.
- Nagtegaal ID, Marijen CAM, Kranenbarg K, et al. Circumferential margin is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one mm but two mm is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:350 -7.
- Birbeck K, Macklin C, Tiffen N, et al. Rates of circumferential margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2002;235:449 -57.
- Wiggers T, van de Velde CJH. The circumferential margin in rectal cancer: recommendations based on the Dutch Total Mesorectal Exci- sion Study. Eur J Cancer 2002;38:973-6.
- Quirke P, Durdey R, Dixon MF, et al. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopatholog- ical study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986;2:996 -9.
- Quirke P, Scott N. The pathologist's role in the assessment of local recurrence in rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1992;1:1-17.
- Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, van der Worp E, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1729 -34.
- Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a metal-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13: 413-24.
- Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 2003;237: 335-42.
- Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2004;18:281-9.
- Zhou Z-G, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1211-5.
- Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. MRC CLASICC trial group: short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted sur- gery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multi- centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718 -26.
- Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Brown G, et al. Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is by dissection in front of Denonvilliers' fascia. Br J Surg 2004;91:121-3.
- Franklin ME Jr, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, et al. Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Five-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:S35-46.
- Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, et al. A prospective, ran- domized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:46 -54.
- Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy- assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmeta- static colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224 -9.
- Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363:1187-92.
- Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Colon cancer laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR): laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477-84.
- Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050 -9.
- Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Ulrich A, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery-are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:723-7.
- Fleshman JW, Wexner SD, Anavari M, et al. Laparoscopic vs open abdom- inoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:930-9.
- Chung CC, Ha JP, Tsang WW, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision and colonic J pouch reconstruction in the treat- ment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2001;15:1098 -101.
- Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Couderc P, et al. Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:451-3.
- Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, et al. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1648 -54.
- Rullier E, Sa Cunha A, Courdec P, et al. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2003;90:445-51.
- Tsang WW, Chung CC, Li MK. Prospective evaluation of laparo- scopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction for mid and low rectal cancers. Br J Surg 2003;90:867-71.
- Zhou ZG, Wang Z, Yu YY, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of low rectal cancer with preservation of anal sphincter: a report of 82 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:1477-81.
- Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, et al. A comparison of the compli- cation rates between laparoscopic colectomy and laparoscopic low anterior resection. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1447-51.
- Delgado S, Momblan D, Salvador L, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from ΟΎ200 patients. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1457-62.
- Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S, et al. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 2005;19:757-66.
- Bretagnol F, Lelong B, Laurent C, et al. The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2005;19:892-6.
- MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993;341:457-60.
- Wu WX, Sun YM, Hua YB, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional open resection of rectal carcinoma: a clinical comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:1167-70.
- Killingback M, Baron P, Dent OF. Local recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the rectum without total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:473-83.
- Lindsey I, Mortensen NJM. Iatrogenic impotence and rectal dissection. Br J Surg 2002;89:1493-4.
- Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. Conversion rates in laparo- scopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 2005;19:47-54.