Srebrenica Massacre: Evidence, Context, Politics (original) (raw)

The Deep Wound Of The Bosniak Nation, Balkans, And Europe: The Srebrenica Genocide

Center For Eurasian Studies, 2019

The 1995 Srebrenica Genocide is considered to be the greatest human tragedy in Europe after the Second World War. It continues to be a bleeding wound even after 24 years for the people who have been affected by this tragedy. The anniversary of the genocide is commemorated at the Srebrenica–Potoçari Memorial and Cemetery for the Victims of the 1995 Genocide located in the Rebublica Srpska entity of Bosnia-Herzegovina.

The Bosnian Genocide and the Srebrenica massacre

2021

This paper aims to place the Srebrenica massacre in its broader context, both in terms of its place in the Bosnian war, and theoretically. The Srebrenica massacre is the only war crime of the Bosnian war that has, in legal terms, been solidly confirmed to have constituted genocide. In the ICTY, 2001 convicted Radislav Krstic of complicity in genocide for his role in the Srebrenica massacre, thereby establishing the fact of the Srebrenica genocide. The ICJ, in its ruling of 2007 in Bosnia vs Serbia, explicitly stated that the Srebrenica massacre was an act of genocide. However, the ICJ in the same ruling stated that other massacres of the Bosnian war, in particular those of 1992 when Bosnian Serb military forces were formally under Belgrade’s command, were not genocide. The ICTY has so far failed to convict any suspect of genocide except in relation to the Srebrenica massacre. Consequently, the Srebrenica massacre has assumed the status of a crime apart in the Bosnian war.

Srebrenica in the Aftermath of Genocide (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

The fall of the United Nations "safe area" of Srebrenica in July 1995 to Bosnian Serb and Serbian forces stands out as the international community's most egregious failure to intervene during the Bosnian war. It led to genocide, forced displacement, and a legacy of loss. But wartime inaction spurred numerous postwar attempts to address the effects of the atrocities on Bosnian society and its diaspora. Srebrenica in the Aftermath of Genocide reveals how interactions among local, national, and international interventionsfrom refugee return and resettlement to commemorations, war crimes trials, immigration proceedings, and election reform-have led to positive, if subtle, effects of social repair, even in the face of persistent attempts at denial of the genocide. Using an interdisciplinary approach, diverse research methods, and more than a decade of fieldwork in five countries, Lara J. Nettelfield and Sarah E. Wagner trace the crimes' reverberations in Bosnia and abroad. The findings of this study have implications for research on post-conflict societies around the world.

The Persistence of National Victimhood: Bosniak Post-War Memory Politics of the Srebrenica Mass Killings

Sprawy Narodowościowe, 2021

The Persistence of National Victimhood: Bosniak Post-War Memory Politics of the Srebrenica Mass KillingsThis article reveals the origins of the radicalisation of memory politics in Bosnia and Herzegovina after the year 2010. It shows that the radicalisation in the public sphere of Bosnia and Herzegovina was eventually possible due to the long-term persistence of the nationalist commemorative strategy, rooted in the dialectic mechanism of consolidating and antagonising relevant reference groups, and responsible for structuring the national memories of the last war according to an exclusivist martyrological model. Based on the example of Bosniak post-war memory politics regarding the Srebrenica mass killings, the study describes a more universal political mechanism, one characteristic also of the post-war Bosnian Serb and Bosnian Croat nationalist factions. Trwałość martyrologii narodowej. Boszniacka powojenna polityka pamięci o masowych morderstwach w SrebrenicyArtykuł odsłania źródł...

The Srebrenica Genocide: The Role of the United Nations

2022

On July 11, 1995, more than 8 thousand Muslims, including children and women, were killed by Serbs in the Srebrenica massacre. The UN International Criminal Court (Hague Tribunal) ruled in 2004 that the Srebrenica massacre was a genocide (“Russia vetoes Srebrenica genocide resolution at UN”, 2015). In Srebrenica, which was under the rule of Dutch soldiers, Muslim Bosniaks armed against Serbs. Then the Serbian forces decimated thousands of Muslims aged between 14 and 75 in this region in front of the whole world. “The Srebrenica genocide is widely regarded as Europe's largest mass murder since World War II, as well as one of the most horrible episodes in modern European history. It was also the first case of genocide in Europe to be recognized by international courts” (Simic, 2009, p. 274). It should be noted that the events in Bosnia were a part of a much larger picture, and in order to understand and analyze what happened in a healthy way, it is necessary to follow and understand the chain of events correctly. This article will examine the Srebrenica massacre in three parts. First of all, it will shed light on what happened in the Srebrenica massacre, secondly, touch on the role of the UN in this massacre and finally reveal the facts as a result of the events that took place.