The Anatomy of Liberalism: Do the works of Locke, Smith, Tocqueville and Mill follow from one another? Do they share a common core, and are there important ways in which they differ? (original) (raw)
Related papers
John Locke and the Fable of Liberalism
The Historical Journal
This article explores the ways in which John Locke was claimed by liberalism and refashioned in its image. It was Locke's fate to become the hero of what I term ‘the fable of liberalism’, the story liberalism recounts to itself about its origins and purposes. Locke is a pivotal figure – perhaps the pivotal figure – in this story, because he put into currency conceptions which contributed centrally to the emergence and spread of liberal ways of thinking about politics which continue to ramify. It was Locke who established that the legitimacy of a political authority was a necessary condition of obedience to it and that its legitimacy was a product of the consensual route by which it came into existence; it was Locke who established that the route by which it came into existence determined the ends for which it existed and, with these, the scope of its authority. All this was explained in an exemplary way by Locke (the story goes), and he remains the great exemplar for understandi...
Locke's Republican and Liberal Legacy
The Lockean Mind, ed. Gordon-Roth and Weinberg (Routledge), 2021
Many people today identify Locke's political legacy solely with right-leaning libertarianism. But the truth is more complicated. This chapter explores two strands of thought within Locke's 18th and 19th century reception. The 18th century liberal republican strand radicalized Locke's conceptions of consent, constitutionalism, and the role of the state, while the 19th century natural property rights strand, itself composed of a libertarian camp and an egalitarian camp, developed his conception of individual property rights to address the moral problems raised by industrial capitalism.
Locke, Maritain, and Hallowell on Liberalism and Knowledge
2014
The rapid spread of liberal regimes in the developed world has been the most notable of the positive political stories of the twentieth century. Throughout the West-and increasingly in other parts of the world--constitutional governments dedicated to protecting, or at least obligated to protect, the rights of their citizens have become the norm. The rise of these states has resulted in an increase in the official recognition of human dignity unthinkable only two hundred years ago. Across the world, the wealthiest and most powerful nations are, for the most part, measured and regularly called to account, through their own constitutional mechanisms, based on how they treat their citizens as human beings-as persons. In fact, it appears that despite continuing pockets of nationalism and tribalism, liberalism has created an ideological hegemony within the developed world. Despite the myriad of political problems we continue to face, the positive effects of this achievement cannot be deni...
Perspectives on Political Science, 2022
While previous scholarship has created anachronistic categories to analyze the political thought of notable liberals like John stuart Mill and alexis de tocqueville, this article improves our understanding of liberalism by using an analytic category supplied by the writers themselves. Using tocqueville's aristocracy-democracy dichotomy, this paper demonstrates important differences in the social and political thought of Mill and tocqueville previously overlooked. specifically, by focusing on Mill's reviews of tocqueville's work and correspondence between the two authors, this essay points out the differences between Mill's "elitist democratic" liberalism and tocqueville's "aristocratic democratic" liberalism. this distinction has important implications for understanding the dominant forms of modern liberalism.