Decentering the Study of Jewish Identity: Opening the Dialogue With Other Religious Groups (original) (raw)
Related papers
Toward an Understanding of Jewish Identity: A Phenomenological Study
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2005
To begin mapping the landscape of contemporary Jewish identity from a phenomenological perspective, the authors conducted a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews of 10 Jewish adults in the northeastern United States. Coding resulted in 6 universal themes (dynamic nature of self-identification, early formative experiences, desire to increase religious practice, generativity, feeling marginalized, and awareness of discrimination). Most of the other 18 typical and variant themes reflected a congruence between cultural identification and religious observance. Whereas only the religiously unaffiliated participants expressed shame or embarrassment about being Jewish, the observant Jews described a sense of pride, the importance of Jewish marriage, and a connection to Israel. The Conservative and Orthodox Jews were most clear about their identity as Jews; they discussed the importance of Jewish texts, heritage, values, search for meaning, and relation to God. All but the most Orthodox participants valued interpersonal relations with Gentiles; for them, Jewish identity predominates regardless of the social context.
Reframing the study of contemporary American Jewish Identity
Contemporary Jewry, 2002
The 30-year enterprise of studying American Jewish identification and involvement in Jewish life has been based mainly on sociodemographic surveys. These surveys have tracked the activity levels of Jewish individuals in terms of ritual practice, cultural and educational involvements and institutional affiliations, philanthropic giving, and friendship networks, but they have not looked directly at Jewish identity as understood in the psychological sense. The bulk of the research about American Jewish identity during this period has centered on the question, How Jewish are American Jews, whether in comparison to other American ethnic groups (in terms of structural distinctiveness), in comparison to Jews of prior generations, or in comparison to an idealized way of being Jewish. Yet it is more apparent than ever that the important issues about the nature of contemporary American Jewishness fall along a different frontier. A new question has emerged. How are American Jews Jewish? In what ways, if any do they connect to Jewishness and Judaism? American Jewry is more diverse and dispersed than before, and the Jewish group in America today is characterized by a degree of integration and social acceptance that contrasts sharply to the situation 50 years ago or to Europe in the 18 century. In this new environment no one is either forced to be Jewish or to escape from being Jewish. The dynamic of acceptance versus rejection or belligerence regarding one’s Jewishness has been replaced by a dynamic of finding Jewishness to be meaningful or remaining indifferent to it. Jewish continuity of the group as a whole has come to depend on the individual’s commitments and decision-making. For this reason, in addition to looking at Jewish practices and involvements in Jewish life, it is essential to examine the subjective, inner experience of being Jewish.
The Jewish Civil Religion of Modernity Dimensions of Jewish Identity : Interwoven or Distinct ?
2012
The jewish people today is mostly divided into two subpopulations: the jews of israel (~43%) and those of north America (~40%). They differ not just in the content of jewish identity but in its very structure. jewish identity in the Diaspora consists of voluntary religious and ethnic identification and solidarity. Alternatively, in israel, while jewish identity is of core importance, it is largely automatic. its major implications have to do with language, territory, citizenship, and political membership. Reigning patterns of jewish identity are now challenged by dissenting conceptions and emerging new forms. in order to make effective policy, decision makers must deepen their understanding of jewish identity in each of the two main centers and confront the challenge of forming a common language to bridge these two disparate conceptions of jewish identity.
Fixity and flux: A critique of competing approaches to researching contemporary Jewish identities
Social Compass
Jewish identities are becoming increasingly pluralised due to internal dynamics within Judaism and wider social processes such as secularisation, globalisation and individualisation. However, empirical research on contemporary Jewish identities often continues to adopt restrictive methodological and conceptual approaches that reify Jewish identity and portray it as a ‘product’ for educational providers and others to pass to younger generations. Moreover, these approaches typically impose identities upon individuals, often as a form of collective affiliation, without addressing their personal significance. In response, this article argues for increased recognition of the multiple and fluid nature of personal identities in order to investigate the diverse ways in which Jews live and perform their Jewishness. Paying greater attention to personal identities facilitates recognition of the intersections between different forms of identity, enabling more complex understandings of the ways ...
A Stressful Identity: Jews, Other Nations, and Other Religions
Israeli Culture and Emergency Routine: Normalizing Stress, 2024
The Jewish culture combines nation and religion in one identity. This identity is structured differently from "normal" non-national religions and from "normal" non-religious nations. Some of the internal tensions and stresses within Jewish identity, and some of the clashes of this identity with other identities, result from the nation-religion complex. In the first part of the chapter I explore the abnormality of Jewish identity. The second and third parts considers two attempts to "cure" the illness of this combination and construct a new religion or a new nation. I show that both of these projects failed. In the last part I ask what goals do these failures serve. I shortly consider an obvious and negative answer, feeling "chosen", and then consider at length a more positive one – external and internal pluralism.