Traumatic Memory and Its Production in Political Life: A Survey of Approaches and a Case Study (original) (raw)
Related papers
Introduction: Transnational Memory and Traumatic Histories
2015
Memory studies has moved from the cultural collective, rooted within the bounds of the nation state, to the transnational or transcultural, which in recent years has come to account for the circulation of “memory cultures” in an increasingly complex, globalised and violent world. In what follows, the essays in this special issue on Transnational Memory and Traumatic Histories are briefly introduced and contextualised within this transcultural framework.
Oxford Handbooks Online, 2014
This chapter considers the definitional and disciplinary politics surrounding the study of memory, exploring the various sites of memory study that have emerged within the field of communication. Specifically, this chapter reviews sites of memory and commemoration, ranging from places such as museums, monuments, and memorials, to textual forms, including journalism and consumer culture. Within each context, this chapter examines the ways in which these sites have interpreted and reinterpreted traumatic pasts bearing great consequence for national identity. It concludes with a discussion of the challenges set forth by new media for scholars engaging in studies of the politics of memory and identifies areas worthy of future research.
Although this book is a history written by a philosopher, it is an important work for anyone with an interest in psychotherapies based on the retrieval of repressed memory. Backing's book emerges in the context of a growing battle in the United States between feminist and other groups wishing to expose the widespread incidence of child sexual abuse, and an opposing camp, organised around the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, which has mobilised legal action against psychotherapists for destroying families by producing false memories of incest and sexual abuse. The aim of this book is not to support one of these positions and attack the other, or even to evaluate their competing arguments, but something rather more subtle and interesting: to try and uncover how ways of thinking about memory and the self developed historically to our current situation where this conflict could occur at all.
Psicología Política, 2006
En este artículo revisaremos 6 trabajos que se centran en el impacto que tienen hechos de carácter sociopolítico, estructuras identitarias y reacciones emocionales en la creación, transmisión y mantenimiento de las memorias colectivas. Estos trabajos analizan el recuerdo de hechos históricos y la manera en que este recuerdo está influido por la edad o género de las personas. Se verá cómo se produce un fuerte consenso intercultural en el recuerdo de hechos históricos importantes. No obstante también será importante diferenciar entre el hecho de recordar algo y la interpretación que los diferentes grupos sociales pueden dar de ese hecho. En los artículos podremos observar como la identidad social del grupo y la búsqueda de mantenimiento de esta identidad social positiva conduce a que existan diferentes memorias de un mismo hecho por parte de las víctimas, sus familiares y amigos, o las personas que realizaron la acción. Estas memorias tienen consecuencias para los valores, creencias y perspectiva acerca del mundo tanto para la persona como para el grupo al que pertenece.
Historical Memory and Its (Dis)contents
Memory Politics and Transitional Justice, 2022
Efforts to recover and preserve the historical memory of past violence and injustice are today increasingly widespread in countries wrestling with, or emerging from, violent conflict. This reflects the rise of memory studies as a distinct field of inquiry as well as the growing recognition of the importance of centrally including the voices of victims in the elaboration of narratives of past suffering and evil. However, as an “essentially contested concept,” historical memory faces numerous challenges that have to be navigated when conducting applied historical memory work in violence-inflected settings. Among the pitfalls, historical memory work faces the unresolved tension between history and memory, which gives substance to claims that forgetting should trump remembering. Furthermore, owing to it being anchored in the subjective domain of memory, applied historical memory work risks deepening prevailing patterns of hatred, enmity and exclusion, in addition to being instrumentalis...