Tax Level and Tax Internalization Effects on Union Wage Bargaining (original) (raw)

Tax progression is good for employment in popular models of trade union behaviour

Labour Economics, 1996

It is a widely-held popular belief that the more progressive the tax system is, the greater is the disincentive to work effort. This belief can be justified within the context of conventional labour supply analysis. Increased progression with unchanged tax revenues decreases work effort and is thus bad for employment. But does it hold in unionized economies, where trade unions play their role in wage and employment determination? Using three popular models of trade union behaviour -the monopoly union, the 'right-tomanage' and the efficient bargain model -as the framework for analysis, this paper provides the unambiguously negative answer that under plausible assumptions an increased tax progression lowers wages and is good for employment in all three popular models of trade union behaviour. This means that the effects of taxation appear to be very sensitive to the structure of labour markets.

Labour Taxation and the Degree of Centralisation in a Trade Union Model with Endogenous Labour Supply

This paper considers the effect of labour taxation on wages and employment in a trade union model with endogenous working hours. In the model, individuals choose working hours with a given wage rate, competitive firms decide on employment taking wages and working hours as given and a monopoly union sets wages allowing for the response of both workers and firms. Heads and hours are assumed to be perfect substitutes in production. The government collects taxes on wages and uses the revenue to finance unemployment benefits and public good. Having derived the results of the conventional decentralised union model we show that when the centralised union perceives the link between taxes paid and public good provided, it will lead to wage moderation and higher employment. Also, wages and employment are shown to be less sensitive to increases in the wage taxation in the centralised union case. In the extreme, if individual worker's marginal utility from public good is sufficiently high, ...

Effects of Tax Reforms in a Shirking Model with Union Bargaining

2004

In this paper we introduce a progressive income tax in the shirking model with union bargaining presented by in Altenburg and Straub (2002). Indeed, we differentiate taxation on employees and employers for the fiscal policy analysis. The main results show that it is possible, with a constant revenue reform, to enhance employment by shifting the tax imposition towards lower firm taxation. And, that it is crucial to consider a proportional or progressive taxation on labour income in order to be able to analyse the effect on unemployment for a constant replacement rate.

Wage-employment determination and a union tax on capital: Can theory and evidence be reconciled?

Economics Letters, 1995

If unions appropriate quasi-rents from relation-specific capital, observed factor prices no longer reflect effective costs. Unionism has effects akin to a partial factor tax on capital. Demand curve settlements need not imply higher K/L among union firms. JEL code: J51 (Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects) *Helpful suggestions were received from John Chilton, Eric Maskin, and Joe Stone.

235 Taxes , Growth and Unemployment in the Oecd Countries-Does Collective Bargaining Matter ?

2000

This paper analyses how collective bargaining affects the level and structure of labour and capital taxes in OECD countries by using cross-country-time-series data. Corporatist countries are found to have higher effective labor taxes on average during the 19701996 period. Effective capital taxes, in turn, are higher in the countries where union membership is higher. Estimation results suggest that reduction in the effective labor taxes decreases unemployment only in the unionized countries with decentralized wage bargaining. The capital taxes have only a small distorting effect on per-capita GDP growth, but there is no conclusive evidence on neither direct or indirect effect of the labor taxes on growth. Small or non-existent distortionary effects of capital and labour taxes on growth can be due to the potential efficiency gains arising from redistributive taxation. Potential efficiency gains of redistribution are supported by the finding that inequality seem to have a negative effe...

The Rise and Fall of Unionised Labour Markets: A Political Economy Approach*

The Economic Journal, 2005

Studying a model where trade unions interact with endogenously formed partisan political parties, we explain changing political preferences for and against the unionised labour market regime. We focus on the changes in coalition formation between unskilled and moderately skilled workers, which in turn depend on inequality among workers. When inequality is either very low or very high, moderately skilled workers form a political coalition with unskilled workers to support a unionised labour market regime. In other cases, the economic interest of the moderately skilled workers is more in line with that of highly skilled workers and capital owners to support a competitive labour market regime.

Models of Trade Union Behaviour: A Synthesis

Economic Record, 1991

In this paper, the fohwing four models of wage determination by trade unionr, namely simple monopoly, wage-bargaining (or 'right to manage>, efficient bargains and insider-dominated are phced within a single framework It is shown thar the pattern of wage behavwur is the m e in each of the four mode& It i s also shown that when taxation is introduced the impact on wages of changes in marginal and avemge mtes of tar is similar across the models

Union Wage Effects: Does Membership Matter?

The Manchester School, 2000

Using a matched employer^employee data set for Norway, we exploit rare information on the union status of both individual employees and their workplaces. We establish two key results. First, we ¢nd a positive e¡ect of workplace trade union density on the level of the individual's pay in establishments covered by collective agreements. Second, we ¢nd that, conditioning on coverage, the individual union membership di¡erential disappears after controlling for establishment-level union density. The union wage e¡ect is therefore a pure public good, with individual membership conveying a positive wage externality.