The Elite and the Quest for Peace, Democracy and Development in Ethiopian: Lessons to be learnt Merera Gudina, AAU & ISS (original) (raw)
Related papers
Respublica Litereria , 2019
April 2018 – April 2019 was an eventful year for Ethiopia. PM Abiy has thrown a blowlamp into the heart of Horn of Africa and Ethiopian society and polity, nerve-wracking the terms of engagement of martial titans and thrown the centre of gravity of the Red Sea arena of war into unprecedented peace trajectory. The way he deconstructed the power monsters of the Horn region is purely ontological. Under PM Abiy, his ruling party has widened the political space allowing opposition and opponents to operate. The media has seen a renaissance. The Horn of Africa is moving towards peace and reconciliation have been started. PM Abiy’s recent speech at Davos indicated a major shift from his party’s ideological leanings. While the Ethiopian economy is growing remarkably, a shift in macroeconomic policy can decisively contribute to high growth rates and new margins of manoeuvre for policies. The glittery feature of such percentile growth is that the contribution of real cost reduction recorded is higher than in any of the well-performing emerging markets. A state model that accords primacy to macroeconomic stability notwithstanding; Ethiopia’s growth potential is yet to be mobilised. Structural transformation will in effect involve unchaining self-reinforcing policy trajectories and a coordinated change in the composition and level of public and private sector investments. Historically, Ethiopia has been the target of attack for religious and territorial gain reasons. Dervish, Mahadists and Italian invaders have challenged Ethiopia’s Emperors. The armies of Yohannes on the morning of 16 Nov 1875 destroyed the Egyptians. They tried again to invade from the north, but were again defeated at the battle of Guræ in March 1876. On 7 Dec 1895, Ethiopia gained her victory at Amba Alage, Mequelle on 21 Jan 1986 and at Adwa on 1st of March 1896 against Italy. The fact that the entire Ethiopian people of all nations and nationalities fought against external invaders are great historical narratives that are vital for good citizenship today. Such a history does not lend itself to the kind of ethnicization and fragmentation that we witness today. The Clarion call of Ethiopianness that PM Abiy has repeatedly asserted must be respected. If this is not a justification to teach Ethiopian history, a clinic of human experience and of informed citizenship, then what is? The key to building enduring democracy is the existence of strong, viable, and assertive opposition; whose organisations give structure to the representation of interests of a diverse body of the populace. The hallmark of a competitive election is that it creates uncertainty about who will hold power in its aftermath. Precisely because multiparty elections threaten incumbents with the potential loss of their power, they generate strong incentives for current office-holders to exploit available resources to prevent their replacement by challengers. It proposes itself, and seems within reach, only to evade and appears readily realistic only to resist insight. Keywords: Ethiopia, Political Transition, Economic Liberlisation, Abiy Ahmed,
Dr. Abiy Ahmed's Ethiopia: Anatomy of an African Enigmatic Polity
Ethiopia is one of Africa's most complex states due to its ancient history, diverse culture and contradictory processes of sate formation. Currently the country is undergoing rapid political and economic reforms under the new Prime Minister Dr. Abiy Ahmed. This paper critically examines what several scholars have said about Ethiopia and situates Dr. Abiy's reformist agenda and new enthusiasm in the broader perspective of the unfolding political and economic transformation of the world's most ancient polity, that was never colonized.
J Abbink, The Ethiopian 2nd republic and the fragile 'social contract' (Africa Spectrum, 2009)
Eighteen years after the change of power and the ushering in of the second Ethiopian republic in 1991, the political process in Ethiopia has, according to most observers, rigidified and largely closed the space for representative democracy. This paper will look at the main organizing political ideas or ideology of the current Ethiopian republic and to the nature of its governance techniques in the face of domestic and international challenges with reference to the debate on "failing" or "fragile" states. The new "social contract" defined after 1991 and codified in the 1994 Constitution is precarious. Dissent and ethno-regional resistance to federal policies are dealt with mainly by coercion and discursive isolation. Oppositional forces voice the need for a rethinking of the organizing ideas and institutions of the second republic in order to enhance political consensus and a shared political arena, but get little response.
The Ethiopian State: Authoritarianism, Violence and Clandestine Genocide
The Journal of Pan African Studies, 2010
“Modern” Ethiopia has been created and maintained through the achievement of external legitimacy. As the European colonial powers such as Great Britain, France, and Italy enabled the Abyssinian (Amhara-Tigray) warlords to create the modern Ethiopian Empire during the last decades of the nineteenth century, successive hegemonic world powers, namely England, the former USSR, and the United States, has maintained the existence of various Ethiopian government until now. At the same time, the successive Amhara-Tigray ...
Ethiopia: One Revolution Short of Utopia?
The FDRE Constitution which establishes a parliamentary democracy at the federal level and sets out an extensive list of fundamental rights is considered by many as a legal document that ushers in, at least formally, liberal democracy in Ethiopia. Many would agree with the assertion in the call for papers that, “[the FDRE Constitution] promised a radical break with the ills of the past and grounded the foundation of the new state in the liberal ideas of human rights and democracy.” However, the extent to which the FDRE Constitution is steeped in the illiberal political culture of the Ethiopian state as well as the illiberal traditions and ethos of the EPRDF is something worth reflecting upon. Both during the deliberations on the draft constitution as well as its subsequent implementation, most of the relevant actors did/do not seem very much concerned about the need to limit governmental power and to put restrictions on the limitations the state could legitimately impose on individual rights. A careful consideration of some aspects/provisions of the Constitution particularly, the distinction between “human” and “democratic” rights and the system of constitutional interpretation/enforcement adopted in the Constitution reveal the illiberal bent of the FDRE Constitution. These facts justify questioning the liberal credentials of the FDRE Constitution. While the 1974 Revolution had tackled entrenched economic privileges that were grossly unjust and the FDRE Constitution of 1994 has addressed various forms of ethno-linguistic injustice, it seems that we have yet to witness the revolution that will tame the leviathan and establish the individual’s autonomy from the state.