Human Auditory Brainstem Response to Temporal Gaps in Noise (original) (raw)
Related papers
Infant Auditory Temporal Acuity: Gap Detection
Child Development, 1992
. The development of auditory temporal acuity during infancy was examined in 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old infants and in adults using the gap detection paradigm. Listeners detected a series of gaps, or silent intervals, of variable duration in a broadband noise. In order to vary the acoustic frequencies available to the listener, a high-pass noise was used to mask frequencies above specified cutoffs. High-pass maskers with cutoffs of 500, 2,000, and 8,000 Hz were used. The minimum detectable gap was determined using the Observer-based Psychoacoustic Procedure. The thresholds of 3-and 6-month-olds were considerably poorer than those of the adults, although the effect of masker condition was about the same for these 3 groups. The thresholds of 12-month-olds were significantly worse than the adults when the stimulus was unmasked or when the masker cutoff frequency was 2,000 or 8,000 Hz. When the masker cutoff frequency was 500 Hz, 12-month-olds fell into 2 groups: some had gap thresholds that were about the same as 3-and 6-month-oIds, while some had gap thresholds that approached those of adults. In a second experiment, a larger group of 12-month-olds were tested with a 500-Hz masker cutoff. Average performance of 12-month-olds was about the same as that of 3-and 6-month-olds in Experiment 1. Some infants attained thresholds close to those of adults. Thus, gap detection thresholds are quite poor in infants, although the similarity of the effect of frequency on performance in infants and adults suggests that the mechanisms governing temporal resolution in infants operate qualitiatively like those in adults. Temporal cues have frequently been creased progressively between 3 and 11 shown to be critical to both human and non-years. A similar age effect was observed for human communication (e.g., all tone frequencies and intensities. Irwin, Pisoni, 1977). Moreover, a relation between meatemporal acuity and the ability to under-sured gap detection threshold, or the ministand speech has been demonstrated among mally detectable silent interval in a continuhuman listeners (e.g., Dreschler & Plomp, ous sound, for children and adults. They 1980). The few studies examining the devel-found that 6-year-olds had higher gap detecopment of temporal acuity suggest that im-tion thresholds than older children or adults, maturity of this capacity may even persist This effect was more pronounced at lower into childhood. intensities and when a low-frequency noise determined the duration of a silent interval band was the stimulus. In contrast, Wightbetween two tone bursts required for chil-man, Allen, Dolan, Kistler, and Jamieson dren to report hearing two sounds rather (1989) found that 6-year-olds were adultlike than one sound. The threshold duration de-in gap detection at both 400 and 2,000 Hz.
Minimum stimulus levels for temporal gap resolution in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
The minimum sensation levels required for optimal temporal gap resolution were measured in five listeners with moderately severe degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. The stimuli were three continuous octave-band noises centered at 0.5, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz. Subjects used a B•k•sy tracking procedure to determine the minimum signal levels needed to resolve periodic temporal gaps of fixed durations. Analysis of data across subjects and signal revealed only a weak correlation between this minimum SL and the corresponding HLs; most listeners resolved threshold gaps at minimum levels of 25-35 dB SL, independent of degree of hearing loss. The results differ from those of normal subjects with masking-induced hearing loss [Fitzgibbons, Percept. Psychophys. 35, 446-450 (1984) ], which showed an inverse relationship between HL and the SLs required for gap threshold. The findings indicate that assessment of optimal gap resolution in listeners with cochlear impairment requires stimulus presentation levels of at least 25-35 dB SL. Even with sufficient stimulus intensity, each of the hearing-impaired listeners exhibited abnormal gap resolution for each octave-band signal.
Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
Temporal gap resolution was measured in five normal-hearing listeners and five cochlearimpaired listeners, whose sensitivity losses were restricted to the frequency regions above 1000 Hz. The stimuli included a broadband noise and three octave band noises centered at 0.5, 1.0, and 4.0 kHz. Results for the normal-hearing subjects agree with previous findings and reveal that gap resolution improves progressively with an increase in signal frequency. Gap resolution in the impaired listeners was significantly poorer than normal for all signals including those that stimulated frequency regions with normal pure-tone sensitivity. Smallest gap thresholds for the impaired listeners were observed with the broadband signal at high levels. This result agrees with data from other experiments and confirms the importance of high-frequency signal audibility in gap detection. The octave band data reveal that resolution deficits can be quite large within restricted frequency regions, even those with minimal sensitivity loss.
Human Auditory Brainstem Response to Temporal Gaps in
2000
Gap detection is a commonly used measure of temporal resolution, although the mechanisms underlying gap detection are not well understood. To the extent that gap detection depends on processes within, or peripheral to, the auditory brainstem, one would predict that a measure of gap threshold based on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) would be similar to the psychophysical gap detection
Auditory gap detection in the early blind
Hearing Research, 2006
For blind individuals, audition provides critical information for interacting with the environment. Individuals blinded early in life (EB) typically show enhanced auditory abilities relative to sighted controls as measured by tasks requiring complex discrimination, attention and memory. In contrast, few deficits have been reported on tasks involving auditory sensory thresholds (e.g., Yates, J.T., Johnson, R.M., Starz, W.J., 1972. Loudness perception of the blind. Audiology 11(5), 368-376; Starlinger, I., Niemeyer, W., 1981. Do the blind hear better? Investigations on auditory processing in congenital or early acquired blindness. I. Peripheral functions. Audiology 20(6), 503-509). A study of gap detection stands at odds with this distinction [Muchnik, C., Efrati, M., Nemeth, E., Malin, M., Hildesheimer, M., 1991. Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects. Scand. Audiol. 20(1), 19-23]. In the current investigation we re-examined gap detection abilities in the EB using a single-interval, yes/no method. A group of younger sighted control individuals (SCy) was included in the analysis in addition to EB and sighted age matched control individuals (SCm) in order to examine the effect of age on gap detection performance. Estimates of gap detection thresholds for EB subjects were nearly identical to SCm subjects and slightly poorer relative to the SCy subjects. These results suggest some limits on the extent of auditory temporal advantages in the EB.
Ear and contralateral masker effects on auditory temporal gap detection thresholds
Hearing research, 2008
A temporal processing advantage is thought to underlie the left hemisphere dominance for language. One measure of a temporal processing advantage is temporal acuity or resolution. A standard paradigm for measuring auditory temporal resolution is gap detection in its ''within-channel" and ''between-channel" forms. Previous experiments investigating a right ear advantage for within-channel gap detection have yielded conflicting results, and between-channel gap detection has not previously been studied for ear differences. In the present study, the two types of gap detection task were employed, under each of three contralateral masking conditions (no noise, continuous noise and interrupted noise). An adaptive tracking procedure was used to measure the minimal detectable gap at each ear (and therefore, the temporal acuity of the contralateral hemisphere). A significant effect of masking noise was observed in both of the gap detection tasks. Within-channel gap threshold durations were longer in the interrupted noise condition for both ears. Between-channel gap threshold durations were shorter in the interrupted noise condition at the left ear, with a trend in the same direction at the right ear. The study found no significant difference between the ears in thresholds in either gap detection task in any of the masking conditions. This suggests that if the left cerebral hemisphere has a temporal processing advantage, then it is not in the form of acuity for temporal gap detection.
Marking time: The precise measurement of auditory gap detection across the lifespan
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 2016
Deficits of temporal resolution are thought to contribute to speech understanding in noise difficulties and may be documented using auditory gap detection thresholds (GDTs). It is important to establish the appropriate methods to measure GDTs clinically. The USF Psychoaoustics Lab has established GDTs for a variety of stimuli, ages (7-90 years), equipment, degrees of hearing loss, psychophysical paradigms, neurophysiological paradigms, marker relationships (within-channel, across-channel), time points, and presentation ears (left, right, diotic). A number of important findings are discussed: 1. Best stimulus for measurement of GDTs is narrow-band noise. 2. GDTs improve from 7 to 9 years of age, stabilize between 9 and 40 years of age, and deteriorate with age thereafter. 3. GDTs may be measured reliably using a variety of equipment. 4. Hearing loss has a minor impact on GDTs. 5. A 2-interval psychophysical paradigm may be used to measure GDTs. 6. GDTs may be documented using the P1-N1-P2 auditory evoked potential. 7. Across-channel GDTs provide different information than within-channel GDTs. 8. GDTs are reliable within and across test sessions. 9. GDTs do not differ across ear conditions. A stable and sensitive measure of temporal resolution that may be used in a clinical setting to assess temporal resolution is recommended and discussed.
Journal of neurophysiology, 2000
Responses of single- and multi-units in primary auditory cortex were recorded for gap-in-noise stimuli for different durations of the leading noise burst. Both firing rate and inter-spike interval representations were evaluated. The minimum detectable gap decreased in exponential fashion with the duration of the leading burst to reach an asymptote for durations of 100 ms. Despite the fact that leading and trailing noise bursts had the same frequency content, the dependence on leading burst duration was correlated with psychophysical estimates of across frequency channel (different frequency content of leading and trailing burst) gap thresholds in humans. The duration of the leading burst plus that of the gap was represented in the all-order inter-spike interval histograms for cortical neurons. The recovery functions for cortical neurons could be modeled on basis of fast synaptic depression and after-hyperpolarization produced by the onset response to the leading noise burst. This su...
Purpose: Gap detection and the temporal modulation transfer function (TMTF) are 2 common methods to obtain behavioral estimates of auditory temporal acuity. However, the agreement between the 2 measures is not clear. This study compares results from these 2 methods and their dependencies on listener age and hearing status. Method: Gap detection thresholds and the parameters that describe the TMTF (sensitivity and cutoff frequency) were estimated for young and older listeners who were naive to the experimental tasks. Stimuli were 800-Hz-wide noises with upper frequency limits of 2400 Hz, presented at 85 dB SPL. A 2-track procedure (Shen & Richards, 2013) was used for the efficient estimation of the TMTF. Results: No significant correlation was found between gap detection threshold and the sensitivity or the cutoff frequency of the TMTF. No significant effect of age and hearing loss on either the gap detection threshold or the TMTF cutoff frequency was found, while the TMTF sensitivity improved with increasing hearing threshold and worsened with increasing age. Conclusion: Estimates of temporal acuity using gap detection and TMTF paradigms do not seem to provide a consistent description of the effects of listener age and hearing status on temporal envelope processing.
Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989
A two-alternative forced-choice task was used to measure psychometric functions for the detection of temporal gaps in a 1-kHz, 400-ms sinusoidal signal. The signal always started and finished at a positive-going zero crossing, and the gap duration was varied from 0.5 to 6.0 ms in 0.5-ms steps. The signal level was 80 dB SPL, and a spectrally shaped noise was used to mask splatter associated with the abrupt onset and offset of the signal. Two subjects with normal hearing, two subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing loss, and two subjects with bilateral cochlear hearing loss were tested. The impaired ears had confirmed reductions in frequency selectivity at 1 kHz. For the normal ears, the psychometric functions were nonmonotonic, showing minima for gap durations corresponding to integer multiples of the signal period (n ms, where n is a positive integer) and maxima for durations corresponding to (n-0.5) ms. F•or the impaired ears, the psychometric functions showed only small (nonsignificant) nonmonotonicities. Performance overall was slightly worse for the impaired than for the normal ears. The main features of the results could be accounted for using a model consisting of a bandpass filter (the auditory filter), a square-law device, and a sliding temporal integrator. Consistent with the data, the model demonstrates that, although a broader auditory filter has a faster transient response, this does not necessarily lead to improved performance in a gap detection task. The model also indicates that gap thresholds do not provide a direct measure of temporal resolution, since they depend at least partly on intensity resolution.