Looking at the label and beyond: the effects of calorie labels, health consciousness, and demographics on caloric intake in restaurants (original) (raw)

Abstract

Background: Recent legislation has required calorie labels on restaurant menus as a means of improving Americans' health. Despite the growing research in this area, no consensus has been reached on the effectiveness of menu labels. This suggests the possibility of heterogeneity in responses to caloric labels across people with different attitudes and demographics. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential relationships between caloric intake and diners' socio-economic characteristics and attitudes in a restaurant field experiment that systematically varied the caloric information printed on the menus. Methods: We conducted a field experiment in a full service restaurant where patrons were randomly assigned to one of three menu treatments which varied the amount of caloric information printed on the menus (none, numeric, or symbolic calorie label). At the conclusion of their meals, diners were asked to complete a brief survey regarding their socio-economic characteristics, attitudes, and meal selections. Using regression analysis, we estimated the number of entrée and extra calories ordered by diners as a function of demographic and attitudinal variables. Additionally, irrespective of the menu treatment to which a subject was assigned, our study identified which types of people are likely to be low-, medium-, and high-calorie diners. Results: Results showed that calorie labels have the greatest impact on those who are least health conscious. Additionally, using a symbolic calorie label can further reduce the caloric intake of even the most health conscious patrons. Finally, calorie labels were more likely to influence the selection of the main entrée as opposed to supplemental items such as drinks and desserts. Conclusions: If numeric calorie labels are implemented (as currently proposed), they are most likely to influence consumers who are less health consciousprobably one of the key targets of this legislation. Unfortunately, numeric labels did little for those consumers who were already more knowledgeable about health and nutrition. To reach a broader group of diners, a symbolic calorie label may be preferred as it reduced caloric intake across all levels of health consciousness.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (16)

  1. Economic Research Service (ERS): Food CPI and Expenditures. United States Department of Agriculture. 2011. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/ CPIFoodAndExpenditures/Data/Expenditures_tables/table8.htm.
  2. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): FDA Proposes Draft Menu and Vending Machine Labeling Requirements, Invites Public to Comment on Proposals. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. http://www. fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm249471.htm.
  3. Harnack LJ, French SA: Effect of Point-of-Purchase Calorie Labeling on Restaurant and Cafeteria Food Choices: A Review of the Literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008, 5:1-6.
  4. Swartz JJ, Braxton D, Viera AJ: Calorie Menu Labeling on Quick-service Restaurant Menus: An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:135.
  5. Backstrand JR, Wootan MG, Young LR, Hurley J: Fat Chance: A Survey of Dietitians' Knowledge of the Calories and Fat in Restaurant Meals. Washington, DC: Center for the Science in the Public Interest; 1997.
  6. Burton S, Creyer EH: What Consumers Don't Know Can Hurt Them: Consumer Evaluations and Disease Risk Perceptions of Restaurant Menu Items. J Consum Affairs 2004, 38:121-145.
  7. Burton S, Creyer EH, Kees J, Huggins K: Attacking the Obesity Epidemic: The Potential Health Benefits of Providing Nutrition Information in Restaurants. Am J Pub Health 2006, 96:1669-1675.
  8. Glanz K, Basil M, Maibach E, Goldberg J, Snyder D: Why Americans Eat What They Do: Taste, Nutrition, Cost, Convenience, and Weight Control Concerns as Influences on Food Consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 1998, 98:1118-1126.
  9. Rydell SA, Harnack LJ, Oakes JM, Story M, Jeffrey RW, French SA: Why Eat at Fast-Food Restaurants: Reported Reasons among Frequent Consumers. J Am Diet Assoc 2008, 108:2066-2070.
  10. Thorndike AN, Sonnenberg L, Riis J, Barraclough S, Levy DE: A 2-Phase Labeling and Choice Architecture Intervention to Improve Healthy Food and Beverage Choices. Am J Pub Health 2012, 102:527-533.
  11. Ellison B, Lusk JL, Davis D: Effect of Menu Labeling on Caloric Intake and Restaurant Revenue in Full-Service Restaurants. Seattle: Selected paper for presentation at the AAEA Annual Meeting; 2012. 12-14 August 2012.
  12. Kraft FB, Goodell PW: Identifying the Health Conscious Consumer. J Health Care Mktg 1993, 13:18-25.
  13. Berning JP, Chouinard HH, McCluskey JS: Consumer Preferences for Detailed versus Summary Formats of Nutritional Information on Grocery Store Shelf Labels. J Ag Food Ind Org 2008, 6:1-19.
  14. Chandon P, Wansink B: The Biasing Health Halos of Fast-Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions. J Cons Research 2007, 34:301-314.
  15. Wilcox K, Vallen B, Block L, Fitzsimons GJ: Vicarious Goal Fulfillment: When the Mere Presence of a Healthy Option Leads to an Ironically Indulgent Decision. J Cons Research 2009, 36:380-393.
  16. Vermeer WM, Steenhuis IHM, Leeuwis FH, Heymans MW, Seidell JC: Small Portion Sizes in Worksite Cafeterias: Do They Help Consumers to Reduce Their Food Intake? Int J Obesity 2011, 35:1200-1207.