Frontal lobe language laterality comparison between fMRI task activation and connectivity (original) (raw)
Related papers
Two distinct forms of functional lateralization in the human brain
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013
The hemispheric lateralization of certain faculties in the human brain has long been held to be beneficial for functioning. However, quantitative relationships between the degree of lateralization in particular brain regions and the level of functioning have yet to be established. Here we demonstrate that two distinct forms of functional lateralization are present in the left vs. the right cerebral hemisphere, with the left hemisphere showing a preference to interact more exclusively with itself, particularly for cortical regions involved in language and fine motor coordination. In contrast, righthemisphere cortical regions involved in visuospatial and attentional processing interact in a more integrative fashion with both hemispheres. The degree of lateralization present in these distinct systems selectively predicted behavioral measures of verbal and visuospatial ability, providing direct evidence that lateralization is associated with enhanced cognitive ability. specialization | asymmetry | intelligence | segregation | circuit W hen considering the macroscopic functional organization of the human brain, it is a basic fact that particular capacities such as language, visuospatial attention, and hand preference in motor coordination are relatively lateralized to one of the two cerebral hemispheres (1, 2). Neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies have revealed a strong bias toward lefthemisphere representation of language and fine motor control of the hands (3, 4), with a well-documented association between handedness and language lateralization that is most pronounced in right-handed males (5). In contrast, visuospatial attentional abilities are represented more strongly in the right hemisphere, with right-sided brain damage being more likely to produce hemispatial attentional neglect (6). Although the mechanisms underlying functional lateralization are unknown, theoretical proposals have appealed to the computational benefits of functional specialization (7-9), with distinct functions and a division of labor between the hemispheres that improves overall cognitive ability and performance.
Reliability of a novel paradigm for determining hemispheric lateralization of visuospatial function
Journal of the …, 2009
In most individuals, language production and visuospatial skills are subserved predominantly by the left and right hemispheres, respectively. Functional Transcranial Doppler (fTCD) provides a noninvasive and relatively low-cost method for measuring functional lateralization. However, while the silent word generation task provides an accurate and reliable paradigm for investigating lateralization of language production, there is no comparable gold-standard method for measuring visuospatial skills. Thirty undergraduate students (19 females) completed a task of spatial memory while undergoing fTCD recording. Participants completed this task at two different time points, separated by between 26 to 155 days. The relative activation between hemispheres averaged across all participants was found to be consistent across testing sessions. This was observed at the individual level also, with a quantitative index of lateralization showing high reproducibility. These findings indicate that the use of the spatial memory task with fTCD is a robust methodology for examining laterality of visuospatial skills.
arXiv (Cornell University), 2021
Purpose: to compare different methods to calculate Laterality Index (LI), a metric which allows to evaluate hemispheric brain language dominance in functional MRI examinations (fMRI). Methods: Two methods were considered for calculating LI: LIAVE and LIVOL, respectively based on the differences between measurements of average and volume of fMRI signal in brain hemispheres. Laterality curves were obtained calculating values of LIVOL with increasing thresholds of fMRI signal and fitted with sigmoidal functions. A model for dominant and co-dominant classification based on fit parameters has been developed. The two methods and the sigmoidal model were applied to two cohorts of 93 epileptic patients and 27 healthy subjects undergoing language fMRI examinations with association, understanding and fluency tasks. Results: Despite the different definitions, LIAVE and LIVOL resulted in equivalent classification of language lateralization. The agreement of neuroradiological clinical reports with classification of language lateralization resulting from the proposed methods ranged from 94.6% to 89.2% for LI metrics and up to 100% for the sigmoidal model. The fit parameters of the sigmoidal function defined empirical thresholds useful for classification between dominant and co-dominant, providing similar values for subjects and epileptic patients for fluency and association tasks. This result supports the idea of a unique model for language lateralization classification in epileptic patients and healthy subjects. Conclusions: Language lateralization in fMRI can be effectively assessed by objective metrics. A novel approach based on sigmoidal fit of laterality curves resulted in higher agreement with clinical reports providing further information about the strength of language lateralization.
We investigated the regional correlates of differences in hemispheric lateralization in 297 healthy volunteers [including 153 left-handers (LH)] previously classified into three types of language lateralization according to their hemispheric functional lateralization index measured with fMRI during covert sentence production versus word list production (PROD SENT-LIST ): 250 leftward asymmetrical Typicals, 10 rightward asymmetrical Strongatypicals (only LH), and 37 Ambilaterals with weak lateralization. Using a functionally driven homotopic atlas (AICHA), we compared patterns of regional asymmetry during PROD SENT-LIST in these three groups. Among the 192 homotopic regions of interest (hROIs) of the AICHA atlas, 58 exhibited a significant effect of the type of lateralization on their BOLD signal variation during PROD-SENT-LIST . The analyses of patterns of asymmetry of these 58 hROIs showed that (1) hROIs asymmetries in Strongatypicals were significantly negatively correlated with those observed in Typicals, which indicates that their regional pattern of rightward asymmetries was comparable to the regional pattern of leftward language asymmetries of Typicals; (2) right-and left-handed Typicals had identical profiles, whereas left-handed Ambilaterals exhibited reduced leftward asymmetry as compared either to righthanded Ambilaterals or to Typicals. Moreover, left-handed Ambilaterals pattern of hROIs asymmetries significantly positively correlated with those of both Typicals and Strong-atypicals. In 291 of the participants, we tested the hypothesis that differences in language lateralization were associated with differences in inter-hemispheric connectivity during resting state by measuring their regional homotopic inter-hemispheric intrinsic connectivity coefficient (rHIICC) in 36 of the 58 hROIs known to be connected via the corpus callosum. Mean rHIICCs were negatively correlated with task-induced functional asymmetries, suggesting that enhanced inter-hemispheric cooperation at rest translates into increased inter-hemispheric cooperation during language production. In addition, the left-handed Ambilaterals exhibited a significantly larger rHIICC compared with right-handed Ambilaterals and Typicals, confirming a difference in inter-hemispheric organization in this group
NeuroImage, 2007
Previously reported leftward asymmetry in language-related gray and white matter areas of the brain has been proposed as a structural correlate of left-sided functional hemispheric language lateralization. However, structural asymmetry in non-left-sided functional language lateralization has as yet not been studied. Furthermore, the neuroanatomical basis of the reported volumetric white matter asymmetry is not fully understood. In 20 healthy volunteers, including 13 left-handers, we performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). We studied the relative fiber density (RFD) of the arcuate fasciculus (AF), using DT-tractography, in relation to functional hemispheric language lateralization. Hemispheric language lateralization was right-sided in five left-handed individuals. We demonstrated an overall significant leftward asymmetry in RFD of the AF, irrespective of handedness or functional language lateralization. Furthermore, in right-handers, the degree of structural asymmetry was found to be correlated with the degree of functional lateralization. We conclude that structural asymmetry in the AF does not seem to reflect functional hemispheric language lateralization, as has been proposed previously. Our findings suggest that the previously reported white matter asymmetry may be explained by a structural asymmetry in the arcuate fasciculus. These findings have important implications for the understanding of the functional and structural lateralization of brain regions as well as for the clinical evaluation of language function.
Assessment of Functional Cerebral Laterality for Language Using Magnetoencephalography
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1998
The purpose of the study was to examine the feasibility of using magnetoencephalography (MEG), a noninvasive functional brain imaging technique, to assess cerebral laterality for language. The magnetic flux normal to the scalp surface was measured with a whole-head neuromagnetometer while subjects (n = 16) were engaged in a word-matching and a tone-matching task. The effect of hemisphere and task on the number of satisfactory equivalent current dipole (ECD) solutions obtained during the late portion of the responses to the word and tone stimuli was examined. An interhemispheric ECD laterality index was also computed. Satisfactory ECD solutions were localized in perisylvian cortices during both tasks. A greater number of ECDs was found in the left hemisphere in 14 (87%) of 16 of the subjects in the word-matching task, a proportion that approaches the reported incidence of left-hemisphere dominance among right-handers. A similar proportion of subjects also showed a clear asymmetry in the number of ECDs favoring the left hemisphere in the language task as compared to the nonlanguage task. These findings suggest that MEG is a promising tool for laterality assessment. Magnetoencephalography-based functional asymmetry data are currently being compared against invasive presurgical procedures (i.e., intracarotid amobarbital procedure).
We investigated the regional correlates of differences in hemispheric lateralization in 297 healthy volunteers [including 153 left-handers (LH)] previously classified into three types of language lateralization according to their hemispheric functional lateralization index measured with fMRI during covert sentence production versus word list production (PROD SENT-LIST ): 250 leftward asymmetrical Typicals, 10 rightward asymmetrical Strongatypicals (only LH), and 37 Ambilaterals with weak lateralization. Using a functionally driven homotopic atlas (AICHA), we compared patterns of regional asymmetry during PROD SENT-LIST in these three groups. Among the 192 homotopic regions of interest (hROIs) of the AICHA atlas, 58 exhibited a significant effect of the type of lateralization on their BOLD signal variation during PROD-SENT-LIST . The analyses of patterns of asymmetry of these 58 hROIs showed that (1) hROIs asymmetries in Strongatypicals were significantly negatively correlated with those observed in Typicals, which indicates that their regional pattern of rightward asymmetries was comparable to the regional pattern of leftward language asymmetries of Typicals; (2) right-and left-handed Typicals had identical profiles, whereas left-handed Ambilaterals exhibited reduced leftward asymmetry as compared either to righthanded Ambilaterals or to Typicals. Moreover, left-handed Ambilaterals pattern of hROIs asymmetries significantly positively correlated with those of both Typicals and Strong-atypicals. In 291 of the participants, we tested the hypothesis that differences in language lateralization were associated with differences in inter-hemispheric connectivity during resting state by measuring their regional homotopic inter-hemispheric intrinsic connectivity coefficient (rHIICC) in 36 of the 58 hROIs known to be connected via the corpus callosum. Mean rHIICCs were negatively correlated with task-induced functional asymmetries, suggesting that enhanced inter-hemispheric cooperation at rest translates into increased inter-hemispheric cooperation during language production. In addition, the left-handed Ambilaterals exhibited a significantly larger rHIICC compared with right-handed Ambilaterals and Typicals, confirming a difference in inter-hemispheric organization in this group
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2011
Cerebral language lateralization can be assessed in several ways. In healthy subjects, functional MRI (fMRI) during performance of a language task has evolved to be the most frequently applied method. Functional transcranial Doppler (fTCD) may provide a valid alternative, but has been used rarely. Both techniques have their own strengths and weaknesses and as a result may be applied in different fields of research. Until now, only one relatively small study (n = 13) investigated the correlation between lateralization indices (LIs) measured by fTCD and fMRI and showed a remarkably high correlation. To further evaluate the correlation between LIs measured with fTCD and fMRI, we compared LIs of 22 healthy subjects (12 left-and 10 righthanded) using the same word generation paradigm for the fTCD as for the fMRI experiment.