The Rise and Fall of the Science Advisor to the President of the United States (original) (raw)
The president's science advisor was formerly established in the days following the Soviet launch of Sputnik at the height of the Cold War, creating an impression of scientists at the center of presidential power. However, since that time the role of the science advisor has been far more prosaic, with a role that might be more aptly described as a coordinator of budgets and programs, and thus more closely related to the functions of the Office of Management and Budget than the development of presidential policy. This role dramatically enhances the position of the scientific community to argue for its share of federal expenditures. At the same time, scientific and technological expertise permeates every function of government policy and politics, and the science advisor is only rarely involved in wider White House decision making. The actual role of the science advisor as compared to its heady initial days, in the context of an overall rise of governmental expertise, provides ample reason to reconsider the role of the presidential science advisor, and to set our expectations for that role accordingly.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
A science and technology policy focus for the Bush administration
Issues in Science and Technology, 2001
With the administration of George W. Bush commencing under especially difficult political circumstances, careful consideration of science and technology (S&T) policy could well be relegated to the “later” category for months or even years to come. Science advocates may interpret early signs of neglect as a call to lobby Congress for a proposition that already has significant bipartisan support: still larger research and development (R&D) budgets. We believe that sound stewardship of publicly funded science requires a more strategic ...
Review of Policy Research, 2009
In this article, we examine the difficult leadership position President Barack Obama inherited as he took office with respect to science and technology policy making and implementation, particularly following the Bush administration and years of the so-called "war on science." We contend that the Obama administration's challenge is not only to take substantive policy action, but also to reform certain administrative practices, particularly in light of the previous administration's practice of the politics of strategic vacancies, a managerial technique that rearranges an agency's ideological inclinations not through the usual forms of active politicization (i.e., by filling the appointee ranks with like-minded ideologues) but instead by "starving" the agency of staff and co-opting its agenda that way.
In the exploration of the consistently complex and brutal interplay between politics and scientific and technological advancements, significant insights can be found within a number of large government-sponsored programs in which exceptional new technologies were developed and significant scientific research was either accomplished or seeded for future discoverers. Those specific projects are the Apollo Program, the Space Shuttle (Space Transportation System) project, the Superconducting Super Collider, and the Space Launch System. The numerous failures of nuclear power in the decades following the Manhattan Project also provides a window through which socioeconomic and political influences can afflict science and technology. These projects all share some form of significant failure or premature cancellation wrought upon them by industrial, managerial, and political failures of all kinds, failures which severely inhibited or even completely destroyed the original potential of these projects. The roles of overwhelming bureaucracy and of overbearing mistakes on behalf of the government are central to these failures, and as a result it is clear that the importance of the interactions between science and the political systems and industrial complexes that they must coexist with to succeed cannot be exaggerated. Throughout the history of governmental interactions with scientific endeavors, it becomes clear that the support of a government in scientific research carries with it an expectation that the research conducted is inherently a means to an end. This expectation, illustrated time and time again in undertakings like the Manhattan Project and the Apollo
Science and the State during the Cold War: Blurred Boundaries and a Contested Legacy
Social Studies of Science, 2001
My introduction to this volume of essays on Cold War science (in the journal Social Studies of Science) outlines key interpretive issues that arise from the contested interactions between scientists and the nation state during that time period. I emphasize that growing controversy over science-state relations during the 1960s and in later years helped call into question foundational assumptions from an earlier era about the nature of science, specifically, the alleged apolitical, anti-ideological, and objective character of scientific inquiry.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.