Patterns of boardroom discussions around the accountability process in a nonprofit organisation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Soup, Soap, Salvation: Accountability in the Salvation Army in France and in Sweden
2007
This paper contributes to the emerging body of literature on accounting in churches. Basing on grounded theory it aims to construct the régime of accountability in different two contexts: the French and the Swedish territories. Whilst most works of that emerging research interest take for granted the sacred/secular divide, this paper will not. The comparison of two régimes of accountability in France and in Sweden pruports do discuss cultural issues at the territorial level. From the cultural point of view, whether nationality nor national belonging are central in the construction of the environment.
Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting
Having substantial accountability standards and practices is a vital practice to ensure the survival of Religious-Based Non-Profit Organisations (RNPOs). This is because the RNPOs are not only representing the religion’s ideals but at the same time, there are also responsible in disseminating ethical massage and good values in the community. Since the RNPOs played a significant role in society, many studies have highlighted the need to explore more accountability issues involving RNPOs. Hence, this study aims to provide a taxonomical review of literature that examined RNPOs’ accountability practices and subsequently, suggesting plausible contextual and application gaps for future research. In so doing, this study utilised van Helden and Nortcott’s (2010) and Rozaidy, Siti Nabiha, Rasid, and Raman (2017) taxonomical methods in categorising accountability studies in RNPOs. As a result, four main themes have been identified from 60 selected high-impact journal articles. The four theme...
Accountability in non-profit governance: A process-based study
Accountability is a crucial element of governance. Non-profit organisations are typically accountable to multiple stakeholders and often ‘do’ accountability in multiple ways. But what happens when a non-profit organisation is highly dependent on a single source of funding? This paper provides an empirical exploration of this issue. It draws on a longitudinal case study of one non-profit organisation in the UK that is highly dependent on a single funder to examine how accountability is constructed and enacted, with a focus on the board. It critically examines accountability processes through direct observation of board and committee meetings and in-depth interviews with board members. The analysis shows how board members work to construct broader forms of accountability beyond accountability to the funder, but then struggle to enact them. This paper provides in-depth insight into the challenges that non-profit board members face and offers a rare example of observational research on board behaviour.
An Ethnographic Study of Annual General Meetings in Not-for-Profit Organisations
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
Research Paper. Purpose: Accountability has been described as an institutional social practice to encourage stewardship reflection and as such it is a process that can be observed and reported upon. This paper describes observations of an accountability event, the Annual General Meeting (AGM), which has been largely absent from the literature. The method and results of empirical research as to how accountability was discharged in notforprofit AGMs is provided. Methodology/Approach The research utilised a critical ethnographic methodology to explore community specific accountability. Findings Sensemaking was identified as an important function of the meeting and accountability processes. Further, accountability was enhanced when notforprofit entities adhered to foundational rules, provided opportunities for sensemaking, and was seen to be characterised by organisational transparency. Research limitations This was a pilot study undertaken to develop the observation and coding model. Future research would include expanding this tool into AGMs of other organisational types. Originality AGMs are required of many organisations, but they have seldom been researched. This paper provides an insight into the characteristics of sensemaking within meeting behaviours, and insights into the role of governors and organisational members in the discharge of accountability.
Accountability in organizational life: problem or opportunity for nonprofits?
Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1995
This article reviews the notion of accountability as an intrinsic experience in daily organizational lije and contrasts it with the more traditional construct of accountability as an external control or monitoring device. The concept of jelt responsibil-ity can provide an opportunity to ...
Management Research Review, 2020
Purpose: This paper examines the puzzles of "ownership", the legal and psychological commitment of directors, through the experience of the work of boards at non-profit organisations. Design/Methodology/Approach: An exploration of the literature on charity governance leads to a first-person reflection on the tensions in directing two common types of non-profit organisations. Findings: In the UK as in other countries, charities are companies, bound by company law as well as regulatory constraints of the non-profit sector. This creates responsibilities of ownership without the material benefits. In contrast to corporate share ownership, a sense of psychological ownership may pre-date appointment as a director, facilitating stewardship behaviour, facilitating stewardship and accountability. Research implications: This paper calls for expanded empirical work on boards of non-profit organisations, giving a focused agenda of aspects to highlight the differences between charities and the corporate sector. Practical implications: The focus on psychological ownership can influence recruitment, induction and organisation of the work of charity boards, helping to ease resource deficits. Social implications: With pressure mounting in deliver of public services, the charity sector needs to fill growing gaps in provision. The constitution of boards plays a valuable role. Originality/Value: By incorporating psychological ownership in a framework of accountability, this paper points towards both a research agenda and practical considerations for charity boards.
Accountability and nonprofit organizations: An economic perspective
Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1995
A popular concern is whether the managers of nonprofit enterprise are accountable. This article considers accountability in the context of three questions. First, how do groups establish a basis on which to hold managers accountable? Second, to whom should a manager be accountable? Third, can a person or group make it important to a manager to act in the best interests of the person or group? These three questions are addressed by the fields of public choice theory, social choice theory, and principal-agent theory, respectively. A cynical way of summarizing the seminal findings in these areas of research is that public choice theory proves that groups will be unable toform, social choice theory proves that once a groupforms, it will be unable to make good decisions, and principal-agent theory proves that a decision, once reached, is impossible to implement. A more optimistic view is that the problems identified by these research findings contain the seeds of their own solution, and that thereby valuable lessons for nonprofit managers can be adduced.
Nonprofit Accountability: Negotiating the Network
The concept of accountability in the nonprofit and public sectors has received significant attention in both research and practice, partly because of its importance, but also because it is challenging to define, measure and implement. The nature of accountability is complex, ambiguous and highly context-dependent. This paper provides an exegesis of the literature on accountability in the public, private and nonprofit sectors, and develops a holistic accountability framework that facilitates defining, measuring and implementing accountability in complex operating environments impacted by network governance arrangements, multiple stakeholders and the growth of transnational governance and a global civil society. An example of a nonprofit organization in the field of international development is used to illustrate how the holistic accountability framework can be used by senior management and policy makers for the purposes of developing an accountability strategy. A research agenda is proposed to increase the fidelity of the framework to understand the implications for managerial practice and to understand how the increasing prevalence of networked action in the global public sphere affects specific accountability mechanisms.