Borrowed affixes and morphological productivity: A case study of two Maltese nominalisations (original) (raw)

Among the derivational processes that have been adopted into Maltese based on the Romance model, there are processes to derive nouns from verbs which are relatively recent developments. Examples include the use of the suffix -ar(e.g., spara/sparar `shoot'/`(the) shooting'), and the use of -(z)zjoni (e.g., spjega/spjegazzjoni `explain'/`explanantion'). This paper discusses these processes in the context of Maltese derivation in general. After a brief theoretical exposition and an overview of Maltes derivation, we present a corpus-based analysis of the productivity of -Var and -(z)zjoni derivations, followed by an analysis of the evidence for indirect borrowing in these two cases, based on the work of Seifart (2015). We show that, while there is evidence that both are productive, the statistical evidence suggests that -Var processes are more likely to result in novel forms. By the same token, -Var nominalisations are more clearly represent cases of indirect borrowing, as evidenced by the greater number of types which have corresponding simplex forms, and by the greater probability that the simplex forms are more frequent than the nominalisations.

Sign up for access to the world's latest research.

checkGet notified about relevant papers

checkSave papers to use in your research

checkJoin the discussion with peers

checkTrack your impact