Ecohumanism: Principles and Practice (original) (raw)
Related papers
Amazon KDP, 2023
In this work the syntagm “Humanistic Philosophy” is approached and represented both as a sub-discipline, branch, issue, topic, domain, section, part of (general) Philosophy, but also as a dimension, goal, ideal, value, sense, meaning, vocation, valence of Philosophy as a whole, speaking, therefore, about Philosophy as a Humanistic discipline of knowledge. As a sub-discipline, part of (general) Philosophy, Humanistic Philosophy is focused on, and brings in attention, especially, the category, the value-concept of Human Being, with the meaning of agency, individuality, subject, the person with the attribute of freedom and self-determination, the respect for the human as individual, as a Person, in opposition to the approaches that represent the individual human being as a simple statistical element into a social structure, system, mechanism, in history and/or society.In the second meaning, crucial concepts, syntagms, and ideas-values that are bring in attention, when we speak, therefore, of (general) philosophy as a humanistic discipline are Anthropo-Centrism and Person-Centered Approach in the general process of philosophical knowledge and investigation. Essentially, philosophy as a humanistic discipline, through all its branches, orientations, schools, and methods, is an ethics of the phenomenon, process and act of knowledge in general, and of the philosophical knowledge in particular, an ethics of the human, of the man, of humanity, and, especially, ultimately, a philosophy of the human as a goal, values, ideal, principle of all the processes, acts of knowledge and action, epistemologically and methodologically speaking. *** Regarding the Destination of this book, its design, content and bibliography are made in such a way that to be useful both to the academic/ scientific community, to students, teachers and researchers, and also to the professional community - artists, educators, managers, social workers, psychotherapists, health professionals, human rights activists, activists in the political sphere, etc.
Humane Philosophy and Human Nature
On the 24th-26th of September, 2015 the Humane Philosophy Project, in collaboration with the Institute of Philosophy, University of Warsaw, the Dalai Lama Centre for Compassion, and the Ian Ramsey Centre for Science and Religion will hold a three day conference on the theme 'Human Nature'. This event will take place at the central campus of the University of Warsaw. A call for papers can be viewed here: http://philevents.org/event/show/17632 Keynote speakers: Agata Bielik-Robson Nottingham University Andreas Kinneging Leiden University Jonathan Lear University of Chicago Andrew Pinsent Oxford University Stephen Priest University of Oxford Zofia Rosinska University of Warsaw Line Ryberg-Ingerslev Aarhus University Anthony Steinbock Southern Illinois University Kenneth Stikkers Southern Illinois University Jerry Valberg University College London
HUMANISM AND ENVIRONMENTALISM: A DIALOGUE
Nnamdi Azikiwe Journal of Philosophy Vol. 11(2), 2019. Pp 87-100, 2019
Humanism as a mode of thought is traceable to the ancient era. Amongst other things, it is characterised by a kind of human-centeredness (homocentrism). Especially in its modern conception, it is an emphasis on the worth of human experiences as the benchmark for decision making; and holds that humans should take responsibility for their actions without recourse to supernaturalism, ideology, or religion. This way of thinking has influenced a wide range of human activities including perceptions about man, his place within the natural world, and how he interacts with it. Employing the evaluative method, this paper appraised the link between, as well as the influence, of humanism on environmentalism. Particularly, since the former is generally viewed as being anthropocentric and thus anti-environment; the paper sought to verify this claim. It was found that, in spite of its controversial status, humanism has certain pro-nature elements that have positively driven the cause of environmentalism. Thus, the nexus between humanism and the environment is complementary and not totally antithetical as generally perceived. KEYWORDS: Humanism, Environmentalism, Dialogue, Homocentrism, Philosophy
When the Human in Humanism Isn't Enough
Humanism has long been one of the most important progressive forces in the development of world culture. It has always championed reason and argued against irrational fracturing of the human species into divided camps of "us vs. them" along the lines of races, nationalities, religions, or any other perceived differences. But humanism still harbors a dark division, one we must now face. As subscribers to the Humanist magazine will surely have noticed, there is a definition printed in a large bold box on the inside front cover of every issue. It states:
When Humanists Know Nothing of Humanism Contrast to the Comprehensive History
Dr Neville Buch ABN 86703686642, 2024
This paper examines the question, “When Humanists Know Nothing of Humanism Contrast to the Comprehensive History”, that is, what do many contemporary humanists miss in their thinking, when they have not the in-depth comprehension of humanism? The paper will achieve an answer by surveying the comprehensive thinking of 40 critical thinking philosophers who may or may not be called, “humanist” but contributed very important ideas in humanist traditions (note plural).
Role of Ethics in Nature-Human Relationship: a Pragmatic Inquiry
Problemy Ekorozwoju, 2024
Primitive people, in their initial struggle for existence, must have found Nature to be a formidable force to reckon with. Our ancestors eked out their means of survival from the abundant bounties of the ancient world with the meager tools at their disposal and sometimes tried to placate Nature by worshipping her. The earth was a rich mother and the needs of the early people were few. With time the ever increasing demands of humankind were matched by their growing power to wreak destruction and havoc. They destroyed forests and dug into the earth with unrestricted abandon in the quest of greater wealth and enjoyment, slaughtered every type of life for food and even for the mere pleasure of killing. Human beings remain the only predator that kills the young adults of a species, damaging the reproductive capital of the latter. Philosophers have argued against the wanton destruction of the earth's resources. That these warnings have been largely ignored is apparent in the danger signs that have started to raise a question mark on the future of life on this planet. Therefore, these ethical theories are needed to be analyzing in a pragmatic point of view of their applications. The tendency of the theories is to concentrate on the former and take the latter for granted. This creates a gap between knowledge and application of environmental ethics. There must be some aspects other than worldviews that affects human behavior. We proceed with a pragmatic theory of ethics which takes into account the practical aspects and strengthen it further with a psychological probe into the aspects responsible for creating the gap.