A Discussion on the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle from the Perspective of Special Relativity (original) (raw)
Related papers
Incompatibility between Einstein's General Relativity and Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
2018
Are General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics incompatible? Each in their world, that of the infinitely large and that of the infinitely small, they did not seem to interfere as long as they avoided each other. However, it is their fundamental oppositions that prevent the scientific community from achieving a unification of physics. The proposal of this paper is to provide a mathematical proof of incompatibility, beyond the fact that they have fundamentally different principles, between the foundations of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, namely the deformation of the space-time geometry and the Uncertainty Principle. It will thus be possible to provide an absolute limitation in establishing a unifying theory of physics, if any. Moreover, while respecting the conditions fixed by the Uncertainty Principle, it will be tempted to determine with accuracy and simultaneity, the position and the speed of a non-relativistic particle, by application of relativistic principles and bypassing the problems raised by such an operation. The Uncertainty Principle as stated by Werner Heisenberg will be then, in the light of observations made on the measurement of the time dilatation and in accordance with its own terms, refuted by the present.
On the Relativistic Heisenberg Uncertainty with respect to the Mass-Action Equivalence
Results in Physics, 2019
has been built as the different version of the relation which corresponds to the Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP), i.e. ΔpΔx ≥ ℏ /2 + +⋯ β p [1 (Δ) ] 2. This version of uncertainty relation is the function of average (group) velocity such a way that it causes the magnification of the phase space's minimum limit in the relativistic domain. At the certain average velocity, this phenomenon will change our point of view from the conservation of energy to that of action spontaneously and gives the impact to the mass. Based on the action conservation, we need the concept of massaction equivalence instead of the mass-energy equivalence to explain the missing or getting mass of the particle.
A simple experimental checking of Heisenberg's uncertainty relations
2006
We show that the quantum mechanical interpretation of the diffraction of light on a slit, when a wave function is assigned to a photon, can be used for a direct experimental study of Heisenberg’s position-momentum and equivalent positionwave vector uncertainty relation for the photon. Results of an experimental test of the position-wave vector uncertainty relation, where the wavelength is used as the input parameter, are given and they very well confirm our approach. The same experimental results can also be used for a test of the position-momentum uncertainty relation when the momentum p0 of a photon is known as the input parameter. We show that a measurement of p0, independent of the knowledge of the value of the Planck’s constant, is possible. Using that value of p0, a test of the position-momentum uncertainty relation could be regarded as a method for a direct measurement of the Planck’s constant. This is discussed, since the diffraction pattern is also well described by classic...
Research Gate, 2023
This paper presents a reinterpretation of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle (HUP) as a common fundamental principle of both Quantum mechanisms (QM) and General relativity (GR). Contrarily to the mainstream opinion in modern physics, this paper mathematically demonstrates that QM & GR are in fact reciprocally compatible (as the two “faces” of the same “coin”, a so-called physical monad), because having this profound direct connection two each other via time discreteness (TD), which TD is mathematically implied by both GR & HUP via the same common Planck units derived from GR and re-used in this reformulation of HUP in terms of Planck time. A future plausible TOE will surely and firmly stand on this reformulation of HUP based on Planck units derived directly from GR. The main implications of this newly discovered GR-QM compatibility will be discussed in a future version of this paper. #DONATIONS. Anyone can donate for dr. Dragoi’s independent research and original music at: www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted\_button\_id=AQYGGDVDR7KH2
On a conceptual connection between the principles of relativity and uncertainty
Physics Essays, 2019
The principles of relativity and uncertainty represent two of the deepest and most encompassing propositions of the physical sciences. Indeed, much of our present knowledge of nature can be recapitulated in these important statements about the processes of motion and measurement. However, a question remains as to the precise logical connection between both principles. Here, we show a plausible and simple conceptual analysis linking the principles of relativity and uncertainty as logical requirements of the idea of physical measurement. The main conclusion points to the logical complementarity of both principles in order to justify the possibility of physical measurements, in which the uncertainty principle guarantees the applicability of the principle of relativity in all physically conceivable systems of reference.
One unorthodox view of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (english)
It has long been clear, that human's ideas about the structure of surrounds him world are correspond to its world only partly. This truth is banal, but only recognition of this fact today is not sufficient. It appears that it's time to make the next step in scientific knowledge and to try to create (once again!) The New Model of the World which is to near understanding of the World as it is.
The Theory of Quantum Uncertainties and Quantum Measurements
- We shall discuss what modern interpretations say about the Heisenberg's uncertainties. These interpretations explain that a quantity begins to 'lose' meaning when a conjugate property begins to 'acquire' definite meaning. We know that a quantity losing meaning means that it has no fixed value and has an uncertainty . In this paper we look deeper into this interpretation and the outcome reveals more evidence of the quantity losing meaning. Newer insights appear. 2) We consider two extreme cases of hypothetical processes nature undergoes, without interference by a measurement: One, a system collapses to an energy eigenstate under the influence of a Hamiltonian instantaneously at a time ttt. This is thus what would happen if we would measure the system's energy. Next, when a particle becomes localised to a point at a time t_0t_0t_0 under the influence of a Hamiltonian. This is thus what would happen if we would measure the system's position. We shall prove th...