Characterization of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Families From a Population-Based Series of Cases (original) (raw)
Related papers
Gastroenterology, 1996
Background & Aims: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal hPMS2) responsible for HNPCC has facilitated diagnosis cancer is characterized by early-onset colorectal canof HNPCC and has made it possible to identify carriers cer and the occurrence of various other cancers. The of the mutated gene within a family. 3-7 It has been recent isolation of four mismatch repair genes responestimated that the prevalence of carriers of one of the sible for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer HNPCC genes among the general population in Western allows for the identification of carriers within affected countries is between 1 of 200 and 1 of 2000. 2 For examfamilies. The purpose of this study was to assess the ple, this means that in The Netherlands (population of age-specific cancer risk in a large series of gene carri-15 million), approximately 15,000 subjects carry this ers. Methods: Thirty-four families were studied by mutagene. These carriers have a risk of ú90% of developing tion analysis. In 19 of these families, pathogenic mutaone of the cancers associated with HNPCC and, therefore, tions were found at hMSH2 or hMLH1. Of 382 relatives, need careful follow-up. However, before recommendation 124 had a mutation in hMLH1 and 86 in hMSH2. Re
Journal of Medical Genetics, 2005
To analyse somatic molecular changes, clinicopathological features, family history, and germline mutations in families with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Molecular changes (K-ras and b-catenin mutations, chromosome 18q allele loss (LOH), APC LOH, microsatellite instability (MSI), and expression of b-catenin and p53) were examined in four series of CRC patients with proven or probable hereditary disease: hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC); MYH associated polyposis (MAP); multiple (.5) colorectal adenomas without familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP); and other families/cases referred to family cancer clinics (FCC series). HNPCC was diagnosed using a combination of germline mutation screening and tumour studies. A series of unselected CRC patients was also studied. Results: There was overlap between genetic pathways followed by each type of CRC, but significant differences included: increased frequency of K-ras mutation and reduced frequency of APC LOH in cancers from MAP, but not from multiple adenoma patients; reduced frequency of LOH in HNPCC CRCs; and increased MSI in CRCs from HNPCC, but not from FCC or multiple adenoma patients. HNPCC was apparently detected efficiently by combined germline and somatic analysis. Cancers from the FCC, unselected, and multiple adenoma series shared similar molecular characteristics. In the FCC and multiple adenoma series, hierarchical cluster analysis using the molecular features of the cancers consistently identified two distinct groups, distinguished by presence or absence of K-ras mutation. Conclusions: While K-ras mutation status is known to differentiate hereditary bowel cancer syndromes such as MAP and FAP, it may also distinguish groups of non-HNPCC, FCC patients whose disease has different, as yet unknown, genetic origins.
Cancer, 2004
BACKGROUNDHereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) significantly raises the risk of developing colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and other extracolonic tumors. It is defined by the Amsterdam Criteria and is associated with germline mutations in mismatch repair genes, primarily MLH1 and MSH2. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the presence of CRC (Type I) and other extracolonic tumors (Type II) in families with HNPCC and to analyze the findings for correlations with germline mutations in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes.Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) significantly raises the risk of developing colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and other extracolonic tumors. It is defined by the Amsterdam Criteria and is associated with germline mutations in mismatch repair genes, primarily MLH1 and MSH2. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the presence of CRC (Type I) and other extracolonic tumors (Type II) in families with HNPCC and to analyze the findings for correlations with germline mutations in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes.METHODSSeventy families with an HNPCC diagnosis were analyzed. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and direct sequencing were used for germline mutation analysis in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes.Seventy families with an HNPCC diagnosis were analyzed. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and direct sequencing were used for germline mutation analysis in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes.RESULTSForty-three of 70 families (61%) presented with HNPCC Type II. In 21 of 30 families that had a complete genetic diagnosis, 16 pathogenic germline mutations (7 MLH1 mutations and 9 MSH2 mutations) and 5 mutations of unknown pathogenecity (all MLH1 mutations) were found. In the remaining nine families, no mutations were detected. Unequivocally pathogenic mutations were far more common in families with HNPCC Type II compared with families that had CRC only (P = 0.01). Families with endometrial carcinoma presented with the greatest probability of mutational detection (P = 0.005). MLH1 was only gene affected in families with HNPCC Type I, whereas mutations in both MLH1 and MSH2 were found in families with HNPCC Type II (P = 0.04). However, the MSH2 gene was more frequently involved in families with HNPCC in which endometrial carcinoma was present (P = 0.005).Forty-three of 70 families (61%) presented with HNPCC Type II. In 21 of 30 families that had a complete genetic diagnosis, 16 pathogenic germline mutations (7 MLH1 mutations and 9 MSH2 mutations) and 5 mutations of unknown pathogenecity (all MLH1 mutations) were found. In the remaining nine families, no mutations were detected. Unequivocally pathogenic mutations were far more common in families with HNPCC Type II compared with families that had CRC only (P = 0.01). Families with endometrial carcinoma presented with the greatest probability of mutational detection (P = 0.005). MLH1 was only gene affected in families with HNPCC Type I, whereas mutations in both MLH1 and MSH2 were found in families with HNPCC Type II (P = 0.04). However, the MSH2 gene was more frequently involved in families with HNPCC in which endometrial carcinoma was present (P = 0.005).CONCLUSIONSCRC and endometrial carcinoma were associated with a greater probability of detecting pathogenic mutations in mismatch repair genes, with MSH2 involvement predominating. The results support specific mutational screening strategies, based on observed phenotypes, for families with HNPCC. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.CRC and endometrial carcinoma were associated with a greater probability of detecting pathogenic mutations in mismatch repair genes, with MSH2 involvement predominating. The results support specific mutational screening strategies, based on observed phenotypes, for families with HNPCC. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.
The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2001
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) describes the condition of a disparate group of families that have in common a predisposition to colorectal cancer in the absence of a premalignant phenotype. The genetic basis of this disease has been linked to mutations in genes associated with DNA mismatch repair. A large proportion of families harbor changes in one of two genes, hMSH2 and hMLH1. Approximately 35% of families in which the diagnosis is based on the Amsterdam criteria do not appear to harbor mutations in DNA-mismatch-repair genes. In this report we present data from a large series of families with HNPCC and indicate that there are subtle differences between families that harbor germline changes in hMSH2 and families that harbor hMLH1 mutations. Furthermore, there are differences between the mutation-positive group (hMSH2 and hMLH1 combined) of families and the mutation-negative group of families. The major findings identified in this study focus primarily on the extracolonic disease profile observed between the mutation-positive families and the mutation-negative families. Breast cancer was not significantly overrepresented in the hMSH2 mutation-positive group but was overrepresented in the hMLH1 mutation-positive group and in the mutation-negative group. Prostate cancer was not overrepresented in the mutation-positive groups but was overrepresented in the mutation-negative group. In age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer, there was no difference between the hMSH2 mutation-positive group and the hMLH1 mutation-positive group, but there was a significant difference between these two groups and the mutation-negative group.
The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
The identification of germline mutations in families with HNPCC is hampered by genetic heterogeneity and clinical variability. In previous studies, MSH2 and MLH1 mutations were found in approximately two-thirds of the Amsterdam-criteria-positive families and in much lower percentages of the Amsterdam-criteria-negative families. Therefore, a considerable proportion of HNPCC seems not to be accounted for by the major mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Does the latter result from a lack of sensitivity of mutation detection techniques, or do additional genes underlie the remaining cases? In this study we address these questions by thoroughly investigating a cohort of clinically selected North American families with HNPCC. We analyzed 59 clinically well-defined U.S. families with HNPCC for MSH2, MLH1, and MSH6 mutations. To maximize mutation detection, different techniques were employed, including denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, Southern analysis, microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry, and monoallelic expression analysis. In 45 (92%) of the 49 Amsterdam-criteria-positive families and in 7 (70%) of the 10 Amsterdam-criteria-negative families, a mutation was detected in one of the three analyzed MMR genes. Forty-nine mutations were in MSH2 or MLH1, and only three were in MSH6. A considerable proportion (27%) of the mutations were genomic rearrangements (12 . Notably, a deletion encompassing exons 1-6 of MSH2 was detected in seven apparently unrelated families (12% of the total cohort) and was subsequently proven to be a founder. Screening of a second U.S. cohort with HNPCC from Ohio allowed the identification of two additional kindreds with the identical founder deletion. In the present study, we show that optimal mutation detection in HNPCC is achieved by combining accurate and expert clinical selection with an extensive mutation detection strategy. Notably, we identified a common North American deletion in MSH2, accounting for ∼10% of our cohort. Genealogical, molecular, and haplotype studies showed that this deletion represents a North American founder mutation that could be traced back to the 19th century.
Gut, 2010
Background and aims-Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in developed countries. Newfoundland has the highest incidence of CRC in Canada and the highest rate of familial CRC yet reported in the world. To determine the impact of mutations in known CRC susceptibility genes and the contribution of the known pathways to the development of hereditary CRC, an incident cohort of 750 patients with CRC (708 different families) from the Newfoundland population was studied.