Portrayals of science and scientists, and ‘science for citizenship’ (original) (raw)
Related papers
Social Images of Science and of Scientists, and the Imperative of Science Education for All
Social Images of Science and of Scientists, and the Imperative of Science Education for All, 2020
In this chapter we engage the question: why teach science in compulsory educa- tion in the twenty-first century? We adhere to the idea that the currently proclaimed aim of a quality science education for all, with equity and social justice, crucially needs: (1) explicitly addressing the social imaginary of science in a critical way, and (2) designing and implementing pedagogies that are founded on, and present stu- dents with, a more democratic conception of the nature of science.
During the last decades students‟ science-related interests, attitudes, and images of science and scientists, and their differentiations according to gender, culture, and socio-economic status have been investigated by a multitude of research studies. These aspects of students‟ voices seem to be interrelated and to also affect students‟ achievement in science and their relevant study and career aspirations. Moreover, school science and teachers, as well as popular science are considered as factors determining students‟ voices. This paper attempts a mapping of relevant literature in order to highlight crucial outcomes and draw educational and research implications. It is suggested that a comprehensive and integrated investigation of the voices of students, of school science and teachers‟, and of popular science is required in order to make informed, research-based decisions on designing school science curricula and teaching.
Eppur si muove: Doing History and Philosophy of Science with Peter Machamer
Science is one of the most important forces in contemporary society. The most reliable source of knowledge about the world, science shapes the technological possibilities before us, informs public policy, and is crucial to measuring the efficacy of public policy. Yet it is not a simple repository of facts on which we can draw. It is an ongoing process of evidence gathering, discovery, contestation, and criticism. I will argue that an understanding of the nature of science and the scientific process should be the central goal for scientific literacy, rather than a grasp of specific (often disciplinary) facts. With this understanding of science as a backdrop, the paper then turns to modes for citizen engagement with science. This paper articulates different ways citizens can engage with science, including four avenues for legitimate contestation of scientific claims. I then look more closely at contestation of science on the basis of values. That science can be legitimately contested by non-experts on a range of grounds means that science communication should not just aim at getting citizens to accept scientific claims, but rather to engage in a more robust two-way conversation about science.
TURN ON THE LIGHT ON SCIENCE. A research-based guide to break down popular stereotypes about science and scientists, 2017
Scientists deserve public recognition. The way people generally depict scientists is uncanny: they draw someone with a hangdog look, frizzy hair and test tube in hand, all in a scene where things are going wrong. Stereotypes about scientists range from the arrogant, amoral researcher who wants to rule the world to the elitist and dispassionate genius who is out of touch with reality. All together, these images convey the message that scientists are somehow "different" from ordinary citizens, and anyone who is different is immediately suspect. To be noted that the popular image of a scientist is that of a man overlooking the presence women from the scientific world. Scientists are also perceived as a huge societal cost because they need significant amounts of public funding, though it is not clearly understood by ordinary people what they are doing, why they need such amounts of money and what is the socio-economic return of the investments. The implications can be far-reaching. Young people, and particularly girls, who are heavily swayed by what they see on TV and in the movies may choose not to pursue careers in science because of these unflattering images. Moreover, the public at large may be reluctant to support increased budgetary allocations for scientific research because they don't really understand what scientists do and are not altogether sure that today's scientific research will benefit humankind. The lesson from our book is that it is possible through specific actions and events to change people's mind about scientists and to raise general public passion and interest towards science and its findings.
Embedding the Scientists: Civic Issues as Context for Teaching and Learning
Journal of the Assembly for Expanded Perspectives on Learning, 2023
We teach science as a path to meaningful civic engagement in a participatory democracy and as a path that should be open to all; our concern lies in how the next generation of young citizens 1 address challenging civic issues both by applying science to other contexts-public and civic-as well as communicating science to others-peers and the public. To that end, our article seeks to explain an interdisciplinary capstone course for our general education program that we developed to promote and support science learning and science communication by teaching in the context of important civic issues. Science is not about big words. It's not about lab coats and safety goggles, and it's definitely not about trying to make yourself sound fancy. Science is not an end in and of itself, but a path. It's a method to help you discover the underlying order of the world around you and to use those discoveries to help you predict how things will behave in the future.
2013
This study formed the preliminary literature review for my doctoral thesis. It aims to critically examine how science education may be leading to unrealistic expectations by students which lead to them withdrawing from a future in science after higher level studies. I will use theoretical arguments that examine how the creation of scientific knowledge through history has influenced our ideas of what science is in modern society. Using theories of power and how they are related to scientific knowledge, I will be examining how education reinforces the power of science, whilst simultaneously, and possibly contradictorily, tries to give all individuals an equal opportunity for scientific literacy. I contend that there is a mismatch in how science is portrayed in secondary school education compared to the science practiced in the real world. The changes in the school science curricula are analysed to explore the power struggle between an authentic experience of science and the political aims in science education. In doing this I hope to identify potential areas for a more in-depth study of how education may be creating an illusion of the science professions which is resulting in a struggle for to retain scientists after graduation.
Science Education, 2001
This article offers a general framework for examining the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Eight specific content‐transcending topics to be emphasized in science education are proposed. The topics are grouped under the headings science as a social process, limitations of science, values in science, and critical attitude. Each topic is explored, and it is argued that knowledge of the topics can serve as tools for students' examination of science‐related claims in controversial socioscientific issues. The underlying perspective here is empowerment and the needs of students as lay people. The need of society as a whole for decisions to be made on a broad and firm basis is nevertheless also included. The main reason for suggesting the eight content‐transcending topics is to provide focal points for the future development of teaching models aimed at science education for citizenship. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sci Ed 85:291–310, 2001.