The importance of vertebral artery proximity to the odontoid process during anterior odontoid approaches (original) (raw)
Related papers
A neurosurgical view of anatomical evaluation of anterior C1–C2 for safer transoral odontoidectomy
European Spine Journal, 2008
An anatomical study for evaluation of anterior C1-C2. To provide essential anatomic data for safer transoral odontoidectomy. The surface dimensions of the atlas vertebra and the transoral approach for odontoidectomy have been described in detail. Anterior arcus of C1 must be drilled out to reach odontoid process for transoral odontoidectomy. The thickness of anterior ring of C1 has not been studied before. Sixty, dried adult atlas and 60 axis vertebrae and ten cadaveric craniocervical specimens were measured for the following: (1) bony drilling depth (BDD), the distance from the anterior wall of anterior ring of C1 to anterior wall of odontoid; (2) minimum drilling diameter (MDD), distance of minimum C1 anterior ring removal for odontoid resection on horizontal plane; (3) maximum bony drilling diameter (MBDD), distance of maximum C1 anterior ring removal for odontoid resection on horizontal plane. Lateral border of this diameter is limited by medial borders of the lateral mass; (4) the widest odontoid diameters (WOD) on coronal sections were measured. On 60 atlas and axis vertebrae, the BDD was 7.0 ± 1.2 mm on dry bones, the distance between the medial borders of the lateral mass (MBDD) was 16.1 ± 1.5 mm, and the WOD on coronal sections (WOD) was 9.8 ± 0.8 mm. On cadavers, the distance between the two edges of C1 anterior ring removal for odontoid resection (MDD) was 10.8 ± 1.1 mm and the WOD on coronal sections (WOD) was 10.1 ± 1.4 mm. An odontoid surgery through transoral approach is safe and feasible. A quantitative understanding of the anterior anatomy of C-1 and C-2 is necessary when considering transoral odontoid resection. In this study the authors define safe zones for anterior atlas and axis.
Anatomy, 2019
The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphometric parameters of the odontoid process using 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images and investigate the applicability of using one or two screws for fixing odontoid process fractures. Methods: CT images of 100 patients (55 males, 45 females) were transferred to the OsiriX program in DICOM format and converted into three dimensional images using the 3D volume rendering feature. Male and female groups were divided into 8-30, 31-50 and over 50 age groups and features of the odontoid process were measured. Results: In the coronal plane, the minimum external transverse length of the odontoid process (OPmin) was highest in males over 50 year of age with a value of 11.3 mm. In the sagittal plane, the combination of anterior-posterior length of the odontoid process and vertebral body (OPAP) was highest in the males over 50 (14.5 mm). The length of the line taken from the anteriorinferior corner of the vertebral body to the top of odontoid process (LAIT) was measured the highest measured as 45.2 mm in males over 50. These measurements were higher in males than females. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that it is possible to use a single 4.5 mm or 3.5 mm cannulated screw in the Turkish population. The application of two 3.5 mm screws was found to be appropriate in 76% of males and 62% of females.
Morphometric analysis of the odontoid process: using computed tomography—in the Greek population
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015
Aim A morphometric analysis of the odontoid process of the A2 vertebra, in the Greek population, was conducted using CT scan. We aimed to determine the feasibility to use one or two screws when treating fractures of this anatomic element. Patients and methods One hundred and fifteen patients (57 men) of a mean age of 48 years (16-95 years) underwent a cervical spine CT scan examination. The anteriorposterior and transverse diameters of the odontoid process were measured from the base, at 1-mm interval upward on axial CT images. The length from the tip of the odontoid process to the anterior-inferior angle of the body of the axis was calculated. Data concerning the height and weight of the examined patients were collected. Results The mean transverse and anterior-posterior distances were found to be 11.46 and 10.45 mm, respectively, for the upper end of the odontoid process. At the neck level of the odontoid process, the equivalent mean values were 11.12 and 8.73 mm, respectively, while at the base, these distances were found to be 13.84 and 12.3 mm, respectively. The mean distance from the tip of the odontoid to its base was 17.25 and 17.28 mm, respectively, while the mean distance from the tip of the dens to the anteriorinferior corner of the axis' body was 39.2 mm. Men showed greater values than women. Conclusions In this study, it was shown that in the Greek population there is enough room for one 4.5-mm or one 3.5-mm cannulated screw to be used. The application of two 3.5-mm screws is feasible in 58.6 % of the male and 26.3 % of the female population. This confirms that the knowledge of the true dimensions of the odontoid process is of paramount importance before the proper management of fractured dens using the anterior screw technique.
World Neurosurgery, 2019
Fracture of the odontoid process is a critical injury to diagnose and often treat. The aim of this anatomic study was to present a comprehensive understanding of this part of the C2 vertebra.-METHODS: We used 20 C2 vertebrae. Samples underwent imaging (computed tomography [CT] with and without three-dimensional reconstruction, micro-CT, 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging) and sagittal and coronal sectioning using a bone saw. Sectioned specimens were imaged under a digital handheld microscope, and transillumination of the bone was used to highlight its internal trabecular pattern. Three samples underwent infusion of the odontoid process with a hardening substance and were then decalcified.-RESULTS: Internal trabecular patterns of the odontoid process of all specimens were discernible. In sagittal and coronal sections, trabecular patterns were highlighted with transillumination, but the patterns were much clearer using the digital microscope. Magnetic resonance imaging and CT provided the least detail of the imaging methods, but the trabecular patterns could be identified. Three-dimensional reconstruction of CT data was the preferred imaging method over magnetic resonance imaging and CT without three-dimensional reconstruction. The most distinct trabecular and cortical patterns were seen using micro-CT. Osteoporosis was seen in 2 specimens (10%). Five specimens (25%) were found to have a subdental synchondrosis. For most specimens, the trabeculae were found throughout the odontoid process.-CONCLUSIONS: Improved knowledge of the anatomy, structural composition, and variations within the C2 vertebra may allow for better treatment options and patient care.
Computerized Tomography–Based Morphometric Analysis of Odontoid in 100 Egyptian Patients
International Journal of Spine Surgery, 2020
BackgroundThere is still no consensus in the literature regarding the use of 1 screw or 2 screws. A number of studies have proved ethnic variations in the morphometry of the odontoid. There is no literature on the morphometry of odontoid in Egyptian patients.MethodsComputerized tomography (CT) scans of the head and cervical spine of 100 healthy (no evidence of cervical spine fracture) patients of Egyptian origin were studied. Measurements were performed using Horos software, which allowed exact morphometric measurements to be taken at a specific angle in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes.ResultsThe mean age was 48.57 ± 15.39 years (range, 18–79 years; 56 male and 44 female patients). The mean radiologically calculated screw length and the mean radiologically calculated screw insertion angle were 38.21 ± 2.2 mm and 55.7° ± 3.84°, respectively. The mean anteroposterior and transverse diameter of the odontoid at the waist in the axial cut were 11.02 ± 1.05 mm and 8.92 ± 0.93 mm, respectively. A total of 54% and 6% of the study sample had the transverse waist diameter of the odontoid in the axial cut below 9 mm and 7.4 mm, respectively. A total of 48% of the male and 61% of the female patients had their transverse diameter of the odontoid at the waist below 9 mm. There was a statistically significant difference in all the measurements of the odontoid between the male and female patients except in the anteroposterior diameter of the base of odontoid (P = .06) in the axial cut, and the radiologically calculated screw insertion angle (P = .57). The mean distance between the apex of the odontoid and the screw exit was 1.8 ± 0.75 mm (range, 0–3 mm).ConclusionsCT-based morphometric analysis of the odontoid is necessary before using 2-screw fixation technique. Single 4.5-mm Herbert screws could be used in all Egyptian patients without the need for CT-based morphometric analysis of the odontoid. The posterior screw can violate the posterior wall of the odontoid, with a reduced fracture hold and a chance of injuring the thecal sac.
Object: Atlantoaxial instability with irreducible odontoid process is one of the challenges in spine surgery. These lesions are commonly treated through anterior transoral approach which is followed by posterior atlantoaxial fusion. However, there are still many limitations, especially cerebrospinal fluid fistula with subsequent life‑threatening infection, difficulty in cases with limited opening of mouth due to temporomandibular arthritis or anomalies of naso‑oropharynx. Türe et al. used the extreme lateral transatlas approach for the removal of odontoid. In this study, we applied the transatlas approach but through posterior midline incision aiming to evaluate its safety and feasibility. Methods: In four silicon injected, formalin‑fixed cadaver heads, posterior removal of the odontoid was done through the familiar midline incision and subperiosteal muscle separation and elevation of muscles as on unit followed by microscopic exposure and mobilization of the vertebral artery after opening of the foramen transversarium of atlas followed by drilling of lateral mass and odontoidectomy. Occipitocervical stabilization was done between the occiput and C2, C3 (C1 lateral mass screw can be added in the contralateral side for better stabilization). Results: Unilateral excision of the lateral mass of atlas after mobilization of the vertebral artery provided safe and excellent exposure of the odontoid process in the four cadaver heads without injury to vertebral artery or retraction of the dura. Conclusion: Posterior removal of the odontoid can be done safely through wide and sterile operative field, and occipitocervical fixation performed at the same sitting without need for another operation and hence avoids the risk of cord injury from repositioning.
Neurosurgical Focus
OBJECTIVE The resection of an upwardly migrated odontoid is most widely performed via an anterior endoscopic endonasal approach after the addition of posterior occipitocervical instrumentation. In patients with craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies like basilar invagination (BI), surgery is usually achieved in two separate stages. However, the authors have recently introduced a novel posterior transaxis approach in which all the therapeutic goals of the surgery can be safely and effectively accomplished in a single-stage procedure. The aim of the current study was to compare the widely used anterior and the recently introduced posterior approaches on the basis of objective clinical results in patients who underwent odontoid resection for BI. METHODS Patients with BI who had undergone odontoid resection were retrospectively reviewed in two groups. The first group (n = 7) consisted of patients who underwent anterior odontoidectomy via the standard anterior transnasal route, and the...