“To judge a thief: How the background of thieves became central to dispensing justice, Western Australia, 1921-1951,” Law & History 4, no. 1 (2017): 113-144. (original) (raw)
Related papers
From Ned Kelly to Waltzing Matilda, tales of thievery dominate Australia’s colonial history. Yet while theft represents one of the most pervasive forms of criminal activity, it remains an under-researched area in Australian historical scholarship. This article draws on detailed inter-jurisdictional research from Victoria and Western Australia to elaborate trends in the prosecution, conviction and sentencing of theft in colonial Australia. In particular, we use these patterns to explore courtroom attitudes towards different forms of theft by situating such statistics within the context of contemporary commentaries. We examine the way responses to theft and the protection of property were affected by colonial conditions, and consider the influence of a variety of factors on the outcomes of theft trials.
Man Robbery—A Gender Signifier in Convict Australia 1827–1836
Societies, 2020
This paper investigates the use of the anomalous term ‘man robbery’ in historical records relating to convict women in New South Wales. We question its accuracy as a criminal offence and conclude that its use in the 1830s was an administrative code that summarized an assessment not only of the women’s criminality but also of their morality. Its use in the historical records has been accepted uncritically by modern historians. The anomaly was identified through a large-scale study of these records. Often used to trace the histories of individual women for genealogical research, recurring patterns in the records are more noticeable when considering the crimes of some 5000 women transported to New South Wales, especially when their court records held in Britain are compared with those held in Australia. Evidence has emerged that the criminality of the women has been reduced by this gendered criminal offence. Inconsistency in the application of the term ‘man robbery’ led us to question ...
Abstract Burglary and pickpocketing were the two most prevalent forms of male and female offending respectively in the flourishing colonial capital of Melbourne during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Using court records and newspaper accounts, this article compares the prosecution patterns and public perceptions of male burglars and female pickpockets. Both offences were associated in the Anglophone world with membership of the criminal classes, and in the colonial context with concerns about a remnant convict populace. Moreover, both male burglary and female pickpocketing occurred in intimate contexts that threatened the possibility of sexual violence or uncontrolled female sexuality. Yet although both crimes were the subject of community concerns, the conviction rates for burglary and pickpocketing differed dramatically. This article examines the ways in which the gendered contexts of burglary and pickpocketing—in relation to constructions of victims as much as defendants—exacerbated the usual differences found in trial outcomes for men and women, as well as other factors that served to place men at far greater risk of conviction. It is suggested that a close reading of the victimization narratives of these two offences complicates traditional perspectives on the policing of male and female sexualities in the criminal justice system.
The use of longitudinal data from the criminal records of a sample of 6,042 female prisoners in nineteenth-and twentieth-century Victoria reveals limitations in the traditional method of examining criminality within specific offense categories. Investigations devoted exclusively to particular categories of women's offenses potentially obscures the extent to which women resorted to multiple forms of offending. Such versatile activity challenges conceptions of women as predominantly petty offenders by suggesting that some women were arrested for minor offenses because of their engagement in more serious crimes and their participation in criminal sub-cultures.
Book thieves were a familiar figure to the reading public of Australia and other English-speaking nations during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Their exploits were covered in books about books, library and medical journals, and in newspapers that reported their appearances in court, and treated them as a humorous oddity in other coverage. This article examines the historic concerns and assumptions about book thieves, as well as what these tropes reveal about prevailing discourses regarding thieves more generally. The book thief – invariably constructed in the popular imagination as a middle-class male – was a classed and gendered figure, one at odds with contemporary understandings of theft as an act committed by members of an uncultured criminal class. By scrutinizing the development of popular conceptions of the book thief as an entity clearly distinguishable from the ordinary thief, I demonstrate the centrality of literacy and literary culture to how thieves themselves were read.
‘They were subject to our laws’: Aboriginal defendants in NSW courts 1850–1914
History Australia, 2020
We now know a good deal about how Indigenous peoples came to be British legal subjects in settler colonised Australia. But we know very much less in any systematic way about the experience of Aboriginal accused, especially in the eastern half of Australia. A significant barrier to understanding the presence of Aboriginal defendants in colonial courts has been their common erasure from official statistics. Laborious historical investigation is essential to advance any understanding of the frequency of appearance of particular populations, or indeed of any patterns of process and outcomes affecting such. This article reports the outcomes of a systematic reconstruction of the prosecution of Aboriginal defendants. Drawing on Prosecution Project data systematically recorded for all criminal trial events in New South Wales between 1850 and 1914, I establish identity through information available in court records, colonial newspapers and police gazettes. I analyse the crimes for which defendants were prosecuted, and their consequences including both convictions and acquittals, and resulting sentencing outcomes. The discussion of results will focus on questions of justice and fairness in legal procedure as they are discoverable in this history.
In recent decades, historians have produced a wealth of scholarship demonstrating the importance of the exploration of domestic contexts and familial dynamics to the development of understandings of women's historical experiences. However, the home lives of a particular group of women—those on the criminal margins of society—warrant further investigation. The study of such women challenges the hetero-orthodox assumption that women's relationships with men have historically been more important than their relationships with one another. This article suggests that men were often fleeting figures in the families of criminal women. Male absence encouraged women from criminal subcultures, instead, to draw together to form female-centred households. Such living arrangements were further facilitated by the general instability in the home lives of criminal women caused by financial uncertainty, periodic incarceration and crackdowns by authorities, as well as by separations from their natal families and a high degree of personal mobility. These issues are explored through archival material from late nineteenth- and early twentieth century Melbourne, and through the writings of prison poet Janet Dibben.
Convict Connections: The Merging of Penal Spheres in Western Australia 1850-68
Convict transportation was an extensive system which many European countries and their colonies used as a form of punishment for convicted criminals. Over centuries the British transportation process was heavily influenced by developments within theories of punishment and the needs of its Empire. i Though Britain's strategic requirements tended to be centred on its sphere of influence, other motivations for transporting convicts were often more complex and ranged from the removal of unwanted criminals, to the use of convict labour and the expansion of the scope of power and control. This essay examines the global integration of convicts transported to Western Australia during the nineteenth century, highlighting the numerous systems of networks, through which beliefs, ideas and people moved. The main focus of this study is drawn from the vast numbers of convicts that were sent to the colony from within the British Empire, including those from Bermuda, India and Singapore.