Vera Tolz, The Formation of Academic Oriental Studies in Late Tsarist and Early Soviet Russia, Kritika, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008, pp. 53-81 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Introduction: Scholarly Personae in the History of Orientalism, 1870–1930
Scholarly Personae in the History of Orientalism, 1870-1930, 2019
What, if anything, did "professional identity" mean to European Orientalists in the decades around 1900? What did it take for them to be a professor, Privatdozent, or non-academic researcher in the field of Oriental studies? What talents, virtues, or skills did this require? Also, how were these skills and virtues acquired or molded, especially but not only in educational practices, and what positive or negative models were invoked in contexts of socialization? If the models that Dozy and Fleischer had embodied came to be regarded as old-fashioned, what alternative models did Snouck, Hartmann, and Goldziher put in their place? And how were these different understandings of what it meant to be an Arabist, Egyptologist, or Sinologist related to professional identities in other areas of the Geisteswissenschaften, not to mention the emerging social sciences?
Oriental Studies in the Russian Empire in the Context of Imperial Politics and Regional Discourse
Science and Empire in Eastern Europe. Imperial Russia and the Habsburg Monarchy in the 19th Century, 2020
In 19th-century Western Europe, science often developed in the context of emerging national states. In Eastern and East Central Europe, however, until World War I science operated in the imperial framework of the Habsburg and Tsarist Empires. The imperial characteristics of these states (such as multinationality, linguistic diversity, and a pronounced polarity between centers and peripheries) created specific conditions for the sciences. Taking this observation as a starting point, this volume addresses the interplay of science and empire in Imperial Russia and the Habsburg Monarchy in a comparative framework.
2017
In article the paradigm which developed in Oriental science knowledge of the Russian Empire in the second half of the 19th century is considered. It is characterized by the following features: researches were divided between Academy of Sciences, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense, and two last provided collecting field information and the organization of expeditions. The academic community stayed in belief that the political power has to rely on scientific knowledge, and communication between the power and knowledge not necessarily demands a compromise with objectivity and independence of scientific research. In Russia at a turn of the XIX-XX centuries influence of ideology and practice of the state on science, a certain set of sociocultural factors and even influence of ethical standards is distinctly traced. Resolving the mass of important political and even geopolitical issues, the Russian academic, university and practical oriental studies constantly sol...