Corporate Philanthropy in Asia: Innovations that unlock the resources of business for the common good (2017) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Circles of influence: The impact of giving circles in Asia (2017)
A giving circle is an example of collective philanthropy where donors pool their financial capital to support a non-profit organisation. While giving circles have existed for decades, they are funding a fresh expression as individuals rediscover the advantages of giving together. Our previous study on giving circles reviewed 35 circles, which we classified as either indigenous or affiliated to networks outside the region, in eight Asian countries. These giving circles demonstrate a wide variety of styles and models. Some circles are informal and volunteer managed; others are more structured and use professional staff. While all giving circles encourage their members to do more than make a donation, some utilise the skills and networks of their members to provide consulting expertise for the non-profits they support. In this new study we list 66 known indigenous and transplanted giving circles in 10 Asian countries. We surveyed the members of 38 of these giving circles to understand how membership influences an individual’s knowledge of, and attitude towards, their community, social issues, nonprofits and philanthropy. The survey also explored how joining a giving circle changes the amount given and the ways in which people choose to give. A number of non-profits were asked about their experience of being supported by giving circles and how this contrasted with the support they received from more traditional donors.
Innovative corporate philanthropy in Asia (2017)
The article introduces the author's working paper comprising 23 case studies that explore how businesses in Asia are experimenting with innovative ways to provide financial, intellectual and human capital in support of high-potential nonprofits and social businesses.
Austrian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies (ASEAS), 2017
This article presents an overview of the evolving state of philanthropy in Southeast Asia, driven by global and local impetuses and shaped by often conflicting notions of charity, development, and business. Despite the lack of an enabling framework, new home-grown foundations and forms of institutionalized giving continue to emerge. At the same time, changes in the donor landscape and shifts in philanthropic paradigms towards business-like and technocratic approaches affect funding of development causes and organizations. In the process, gaps have begun to surface in the resourcing of human rights and social justice work by civil society, which is essential for attaining inclusive growth and more equitable development.
The goal of the proposal is to provide a practical and scalable innovative solution for improving access to customized financing for smallholder farmers in the rice value chain, thus promoting sustainable poverty reduction in Nigeria. This proposal first examines the challenges of smallholder rice farmers, including inadequate institutional frameworks and agricultural policies, limited access to financing, and lack of adequate storage facilities. In addition, there are gender-related social issues: the land tenure system makes it even more difficult for female smallholder farmers to acquire land for cultivation, inhibiting their ability to reach their full productive and income-generating potential. Our proposal proffers the development of an automated warehousing receipt system to improve access to customized financing for smallholder farmers in Nigeria’s rice value chain. It demonstrates this through an innovative public-private partnership (PPP) model, the potential of private sector capabilities, and public sector resources to improve smallholder farmers’ access to financing using movable assets such as inventory as collateral to secure loans and get better access to agricultural inputs. To implement our solution, we propose a consortium of government agencies, private sector partners such as agribusinesses and small and medium enterprises (SMEs); financial institutions including micro finance institutions; and smallholder farmers and cooperatives. Factors for success of the solution include a clear understanding of roles and responsibilities, risk and benefit sharing, mainstreaming of efficiency enhancing information technology innovations, and measures to ensure equal participation of men and women.
Philanthropy on the Road to Nationhood in Singapore
This paper attempts to address the gap in knowledge on the contributions by philanthropic players to national development in Singapore. Using grounded research, it explores the evolution of giving by individuals, the community and the private sector in Singapore from the end of World War II in 1945 to today. It looks at how each group gives towards prevailing social needs, unexpected events and crises as well as government calls for community support across five key phases in Singapore’s journey to nationhood. To provide context to the giving, the political and socio-economic situation of each time frame and concurrent government social welfare provisions in each phase are also described. The data collected shows evidence of complementary efforts across the people, public and private sectors over time, from the rebuilding of Singapore after the war to the formation and running of the Singapore Council of Social Service, the Community Chest, Singapore Community Foundation, ethnic self-help groups and various social movements. In the immediate post-war period (1945-1959), all three sectors worked in tandem to rebuild Singapore. In the first years of independence (1959-1975), the public sector took the lead to build basic social and economic infrastructure with the people and private sectors filling in the gaps. Once Singapore had achieved economic stability, the government corralled the community and corporates to first unite in (1975-1990) and then initiate support for the underprivileged (1990-2004). In the last decade, there has been clear evidence of civil society taking the lead in advocating for social inclusion with the government responding with strategies that ensure economic growth without compromising the social and emotional well-being of the people. From fighting fires in the kampong to containing the SARS epidemic and from donating trishaw-riding wages to build Nanyang University to emptying one’s piggy bank to help the underprivileged, the sense of community spirit and initiative has been strong and enduring in Singapore since the end of World War II. Philanthropy has been both responsive and transformative, transcending time, age, social status and circumstance.
Philanthropic Foundations In Asia Insights from Singapore, Myanmar and China
2018
This study looks at an emerging trend in which wealthy families, individuals, and corporations in Asia set up foundations to institutionalise their giving. This giving is motivated by a myriad of factors beyond prestige and status, including the desire to give back to society, religion, family and personal values, the desire to drive change, personal experience, and/or affiliations. This study finds that philanthropic foundations in Asia can be characterised by their operational model, governance structure, and philanthropic focus. In emerging economies in Asia like Myanmar and China, these foundations tend to give nationally and operate their own programmes. On the other hand, foundations in developed economies like Singapore and Hong Kong tend to give both regionally and nationally via grants to civil society organisations that operate programmes, as opposed to running programmes themselves. Further, families tend to retain significant control of foundations in Singapore and Hong Kong, while programme funding serves as the preferred funding mode. This study also discusses the various challenges and opportunities faced by the nascent philanthropic sector in Asia that can address some of the developmental and structural gaps left by the public, private, and people sectors.