Globalization, Deindustrialization and Identity: Discontents of Unfettered Capital and Accelerated Change (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Anthropology of Postindustrialism
The Anthropology of Postindustrialism, 2015
This volume explores how mechanisms of postindustrial capitalism affect places and people in peripheral regions and deindustrializing cities. While studies of globalization tend to emphasize localities newly connected to global systems, this collection, in contrast, analyzes the disconnection of communities away from the market, presenting a range of ethnographic case studies that scrutinize the framework of this transformative process, analyzing new social formations that are emerging in the voids left behind by the deindustrialization, and introducing a discussion on the potential impacts of the current economic and ecological crises on the hypermobile model that has characterized this recent phase of global capitalism and spatially uneven development.
This article examines 40 years of multi-disciplinary scholarship on deindustrialization in North America and the United Kingdom. This field of research emerged in the 1970s and 1980s as a political response to successive waves of mill and factory closures that devastating industrial towns and cities, displacing millions. A way of life seemed to be passing out of existence. Why was this happening? What did it mean? Could it be stopped? This essay identifies three distinct waves of scholarship: an initial activist generation of scholars who worked with the social movements of the 1970s and 1980s, the cultural turn towards the meaning of deindustrialization in the early 2000s, and the socio-cultural exploration of working-class culture in a post-industrial age. As we will see, the scholarly focus has broadened from the causes of industrial decline and resistance to job loss, to its effects and long-term consequences.
Theorizing impending peripheries: postindustrial landscapes at the edge of hypermodernity's collapse
This article discusses the ways in which the predominant economic mechanisms of capitalism, characterized by a hyper-mobility of flows, affect actual places and people. The rationality informing these mechanisms is the quest for a reduction of costs and the increase of potential benefit, and this can only be achieved by jumping from locale to locale searching for a cheaper labor force, new pools of resources, or an absence of environmental regulations. Mobility becomes the fundamental framework through which to understand modernity and its new economic articulations and their associated sovereignties. Anthropology has often discussed and theorized the impact of market integration on local communities across the world. This paper, in contrast, analyzes the extraction, or the disconnection, of a community away from the market.
THE HISTORY AND POLITICS OF DEINDUSTRIALIZATION Syllabus
Deindustrialization Syllabus , 2022
Deindustrialization has marked a crucial rupture in the lives of tens of millions of working-class families across the old "industrialized world." The scale of the body count is staggering. Fundamentally, deindustrialization is a process of physical and social ruination, as well as part of a wider political project that leaves working-class communities impoverished and demoralized. Not only is the social world of the factory floor destroyed, so too is the wider economic and social structure that validates working-class lives. In a post-industrial era, industrial workers are assigned to the past, not the present. Working in partnership with the transnational "Deindustrialization & The Politics of Our Time" project (deindustrialization.org), this course will explore the politics of industrial ruination and gentrification in transnational perspective and examine the social, economic, and cultural consequences of this transformation. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of right-wing populism will be examined. Required Readings: Students are required to read and take notes each week. Undergraduate students read the equivalent of 4 articles per week, master's students 5 articles, and doctoral students 6 articles. These readings can be found in required books as well as in articles found in the library's electronic database or on course reserve.
Deindustrialization as a Folk Model
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The 'New' Sociology of Deindustrialization? Understanding Industrial Change
This article reviews a range of new and established writing on deindustrialisation. It traces the origins of the concept from its popularisation in the early 1980s with the onset of large scale loss in the industrial regions of North America and Europe. We argue that with the passage of time, the academic field of deindustrialisation has matured as the scale and consequences of industrial loss become more apparent. We suggest here that sociology has not made the contribution it could have in this debate and that one of the key strengths of the area is its interdisciplinary nature; especially from disciplines such as geography, anthropology, and social history. Its key aim is to explain why this is the case and suggest that by fully engaging with the issue of deindustrialisation and the range of new material available, the sociology of economic life can develop a more rounded account both of work and its absence.