Argentine Industrialization: A Critique of the Liberal and Dependentist Schools (original) (raw)
Related papers
The argentinean failure": an interpretation of economic evolution in the "Short 20th Century
Desarrollo Economico, 2006
This study reviews a representative though not an exhaustive set of representative explanations of the poor performance achieved by Argentina's economy between the Great War and the 1989 crisis. It analyzes the literature by dividing it in accordance with two different approaches: one that assumed that economic performance was conditioned by structural factors, and another that attributes it to decisions on economic policies and conjunctural circumstances. Regarding the firts approach, it highlights the importance of colonial legacies, the asymmetry of international relations, problems related to the formation of capital, and the flaws of the entrepreneurial class that led the industrialization process. Among the second approach, emphasis is laid on those who point to the lack of State intervention or the State's belated decision to intervene, those who hold the opposite view by stating that it was precisely because of State intervention that the economic parameters favorable to growth and development became distorted, those who point to problems about political and social institutions, and those who attribute poor performance to a series of citcumstancial processes. The last part of the study intends to underscore the role played in this process by the distance separating initial levels of development (aided by natural resources) and the levels of societal general development, chiefly in relation to the available human capital and to the quality of the institutions involved.
Fragmented State in a Neo-Developmental Experience: Examining Limits in Argentine Industrial Policy
Journal of Economics Issues, 2023
At the beginning of this new century, the “pink tide” of neo-developmental reactions to neoliberalism repositioned the state in development processes in Latin America. However, state leadership in countries like Argentina showed clear limitations to implement a consistent industrialization policy that contributes to structural change. An important limitation and insufficiently studied is the institutional-organizational dimension of state-building relative to the phenomenon of state fragmentation, which reduces state capacity and coherence amid wicked problems such as the structural change. Focused on the recent Argentine experience, the work shows that without a real hierarchy and decision-making capacity of the organizations involved in industrial policy, strategic planning processes become incapable to face the logic of state fragmentation. Official documents were analyzed, and interviews were conducted with national officials of the Ministry of Industry (2009–2015) and the implementation of the 2020 Industrial Strategic Plan.
Reprimarization and deindustrialization in Latin America: The case of Argentina (1880-2019)
2020
Master's dissertation in International Relations and diplomatic affairs. This work carries out an analysis of Argentina's economic structure over the last 140 years. A historical-descriptive investigation is presented, focusing at first on the industrialization process during the primary-exporter model (1880-1930) and the subsequent model of industrialization by import substitution (1930-1976), emphasizing the problems of external restriction and of the so-called stop-and-go cycles. Next, the deindustrialisation process, inaugurated by the National Reorganisation Process of the military dictatorship of 1976-1983, is examined, up to the presidency of Mauricio Macri that ended in December 2019. Deindustrialisation is understood both in quantitative terms, as a decrease in the relative weight of industry in the economy and employment, and in qualitative terms, as a transformation of its internal structure and role in the economic development process, with negative effects on income distribution and socioeconomic inequalities. In this way, two simultaneously parallel and consequential phenomena are examined: the dismantling and concentration of the industrial apparatus together with the reprimarization of exports. Finally, combining the historical-descriptive analysis with a quantitative methodology (time series and productivity decomposition), the causes, rooted mainly in the macroeconomic, industrial and income distribution policies applied, are discussed in order to analyse the consequences in more detail: the premature deindustrialisation of the productive structure compared to today's advanced economies, the lack of structural change and the specialisation in traditional low-productivity services.
Argentine Trade Policies in the XX Century: 60 Years of Solitude
2010
At the turn of the last century, the Argentine economy was on a path to prosperity that never fully developed. International trade and trade policies are often identified as a major culprit. In this paper, we review the history of Argentine trade policy to uncover its exceptional features and to explore its contribution to the Argentine debacle. Our analysis tells a story of bad trade policies, rooted in distributional conflict and shaped by changes in constraints, that favored industry over agriculture in a country with a fundamental comparative advantage in agriculture. While the anti-export bias impeded productivity growth in agriculture, the import substitution strategy was not successful in promoting an efficient industrialization. In the end, Argentine growth never took-off. Keywords Tariff protection Á Export taxes on agriculture Á Anti-export bias JEL Classification F13 Á F14 We thank Rafael Di Tella and Edward Glaeser for encouraging us to write this chapter. We appreciate the superb work done by Natalia Porto in the coordination of all the data collection effort. Nicolas Botan, Laura Jaitman, and Ivan Torre provided excellent research assistance. Comments from Alberto Porto and seminar participants at the ''Argentine Exceptionalism'' conference at Harvard University are greatly appreciated.
CEPAL Review, 1999
The combination of rapidly increasing trade openness with sharp exchange-rate appreciation formed the context in which Argentine industry had to carry out its production restructuring process from 1991 on. The inability of the spontaneous market forces to spark off this process led the Argentine government to adopt a number of measures designed to correct the problem of relative prices and further the restructuring process through fiscal means. In this context, the Industrial Specialization Regime (ISR) was established with the main objective of promoting export specialization by industrial firms. This regime was based on a subsidy for incremental exports which took the form of access at preferential tariff rates to the importation of goods similar to those exported or forming part of a given production chain of complex goods. The aim of the present article is to make a theoretical and empirical analysis of this policy instrument (in its dual dimension of restructuring policy and export subsidy), examining its underlying theoretical bases, questions relating to its design, application and control, and finally, its effects on the industrial sector.
Journal of Agrarian Change, 2013
Juan Iñigo Carrera's La formación económica de la sociedad argentina has a double purpose: to measure agrarian ground-rent in Argentina and, by this means, to assess the magnitude of its role in that country's national process of capital accumulation. If, as the author claims, there exists a belief that the 'natural' field of development of the critique of political economy founded by Marx is that of general economic determinations, and that this critique is ineffective at accounting for and measuring concrete economic forms, La formación económica de la sociedad argentina is a thorough attempt to prove it wrong.
Revisiting Industrial Policy and Industrialization in Twentieth Century Latin America
Revista de Estudios Sociales, 2019
This brief article seeks to introduce the reader to this special number on industrialization in contemporary Latin America. It does so considering three issues. First, the importance of industrialization in sustaining high rates of economic growth leading to high levels of income per capita. Second, the long-standing debate in global historiography regarding the successes and failures of industrial policy: markets vs. states. Lastly, Latin America´s industrial trajectory through the lenses of four historiographical tendencies, and the ways in which each of the four original papers relate to the extant literature, and contribute to enhancing our understanding of one of the most important economic transformations in the history of the region.
2022
Juan Iñigo Carrera's La formación económica de la sociedad argentina has a double purpose: to measure agrarian ground-rent in Argentina and, by this means, to assess the magnitude of its role in that country's national process of capital accumulation. If, as the author claims, there exists a belief that the 'natural' field of development of the critique of political economy founded by Marx is that of general economic determinations, and that this critique is ineffective at accounting for and measuring concrete economic forms, La formación económica de la sociedad argentina is a thorough attempt to prove it wrong.