Risks and benefits of sling procedures (original) (raw)

The paper discusses the risks and benefits associated with sling procedures for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). It highlights the two main causes of USI—anatomical urinary stress incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency—and reviews the efficacy of various surgical options, including traditional and tension-free sling techniques. The analysis indicates that while sling procedures have gained popularity due to their effectiveness, they are also associated with specific complications which must be carefully considered when selecting the most appropriate treatment for patients.