Party members (The Conversation, 2016) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Ideological Misfits: A Distinctive Class of Party Members
2012
In this article, we identify a distinctive type of party member; namely, those who identify themselves as ideologically at odds with their party. Using survey evidence from nine parties in Belgium and Canada, we measure the prevalence of these ‘ideological misfits’ and explore the characteristics that define them. While there appears to be no systematic cross-party pattern, it is striking that mass parties of the left have disproportionately large numbers of such members. To the extent that those parties pride themselves on intra-party democracy, this raises questions about their capacity to respond to Downsian drives towards the centre and suggests that May’s law may be one of left-wing disparity.
Party members and activists: the state of the art
2011
The aim of this paper is to present an assessment of the state of the art in the study of party members in Spain. In particular, the paper is focused on the study of convention delegates, by far the most studied topic of this literature in Spain. To that purpose it first describes how party convention works and how they have evolved over time. Then a brief evolution of the different team projects and questionnaires is presented. This finally allows us to critically review the major theoretical, methodological and practical problems raised in this research.
Public images of political parties: A necessary evil?
West European Politics, 2005
The debate on citizen images of political parties is long standing, but recently it has taken on added importance as the evidence of party dealignment has spread across Western democracies. This article assembles an unprecedented cross-national array of public opinion data that describe current images of political parties. Sentiments are broadly negative, and this pessimism has deepened over the past generation. Then, we demonstrate how distrust of parties decreases voting turnout, contributes to the fragmentation of contemporary party systems and the electoral base of new protest parties, and stimulates broader cynicism towards government. Although political parties are the foundation of the system of representative democracy, fewer citizens today trust political parties, and this is reshaping the nature of democratic politics. Perhaps no institution is so closely identified with the process of representative democracy as are political parties. The renowned political scientist E.E. Schattschneider (1942: 1) penned the oft-cited conclusion that 'modern democracy is unthinkable save in terms of political parties'. Similarly, James Bryce (1921: 119) stated 'parties are inevitable. No one has shown how representative government could be worked without them'. More recently, Giovani Sartori wrote, 'citizens in Western democracies are represented through and by parties. This is inevitable' (Sartori 1968: 471). Many other political scientists and political analysts share these views, ranging from the American Political Science Association's call for more responsible party government in 1950, to a 1999 Economist article that examined the role of political parties as the basis of democracy. 1 Yet even if parties are generally seen as essential to democracy, there is dissent on the nature of their contributions. On the one side, the party government literature stresses the positive role that parties play in framing political choice, socialising elites, mobilising citizens, and organising government (e.g. Sartori 1976; Hershey 2004). On the other side, there is a long history of anti-party sentiment from Rousseau to Madison that
Party bureaucrats, independent professionals, or politicians? A study of party employees
West European Politics, 2017
The number of party employees is increasing, but to what extent and in what sense are party employees integrated into their parties? Based on the literature on party change, the article identifies three important dimensionsties, tasks, and career plansand constructs a typology of four ideal types of party employees-technical assistants, party bureaucrats, independent professionals, and unelected politicians. Data on Norwegian party employees suggest that they have strong party ties and are entrusted with a wide range of political tasks. However, career plans rarely include elected office. The results indicate that party employees have stronger party ties than envisaged in influential party models. Professionalisation does not render party grassroots irrelevant, but rather turns some grassroots activists into professionals-what can be called 'unelected politicians'. In conclusion, the article discusses implications for contemporary understandings of political parties.
Unlocking the potential of party research: Bringing sociology back in
Politik, 2019
Research on political parties is a rich field, its origins dating back more than a century. Sociology played a crucial role in the foundation of party research. However, while party research has narrowed its scope and agenda, thus overlooking significant contributions from sociology, sociology has neglected the significance of political parties in the study of related social phenomena. To address this mismatch, the article explores how a sociological outlook on political parties can open up new research questions by conceptualizing political parties as embedded in societal processes, by accounting for various informal processes in party organizations, and by investigating the political profession with a comprehensive practice-based lens.
The Primary Focus: Member Responses to Party Challengers
Many scholars argue that strong primary challenges contribute to party polarization by inducing Members of Congress to become more ideologically extreme. I demonstrate that our thinking about primary elections is incomplete, providing evidence that incumbents who are part of a homogeneous party and survive a difficult primary challenge do not become more extreme, and even move closer to the ideological center of their party as a result. I find this effect for Democrats, but not Republicans, between 1980 and 2010, and discuss how these findings can be explained by an extension of the theory of Conditional Party Government.
Since the 1960s, anti-immigration parties have emerged in many established European democracies. Some of them -for example, the German Republikaner and the Vlaams Belang in Belgium -have been treated as pariahs by other parties. Others -for example, the Lega Nord in Italy and the Dutch Partij voor de Vrijheid -have not. Why is this? In this paper I argue that other parties are likely to ostracize an anti-immigration party if they do not need to cooperate with it anyway. They are even more likely to do so if they can convincingly make the case that its ideologies are outside agreed standards of acceptability. Through logistic regression analyses based on data concerning 31 Western European antiimmigration parties, I demonstrate that a party's size and ideological profile are major factors accounting for its treatment as a pariah. The findings offer important insights about the applicability of the commonly used strategy of ostracism, which has previously been shown to affect coalition building in established democracies.