P. Esposito, Da classico a classico: paradigmi letterari tra antico e moderno. Atti del Convegno della CUSL (Fisciano - Salerno, 8-10 novembre 2007), Pisa 2010. (original) (raw)
Related papers
Classics in Education after 1880
2019
Classics in Education after 1880 Matthew Arnold's lecture 'Literature and Science' (1882) identifies the 'ideal' version of the Victorian study of Greek and Roman antiquity as 'knowing the Greeks and Romans, and their life and genius, and what they were and did in the world; what we get from them, and what is its value'. Such an understanding of classical culture and its reception in the modern world is 'more than a knowledge of so much vocabulary, so much grammar, so many portions of authors, in the Greek and Latin languages.' 1 In his allusion to the prosaic reality of memorising grammar, vocabulary and fragments of classical texts chosen more as examples of style than content, Arnold articulates a dissatisfaction with the established methods of classical teaching that his audiences in British and American universities might well have shared. 'Clearly something went profoundly wrong with the study of the classics in the nineteenth century', writes Gilbert Highet in 1949, noting how frequently even genuine lovers of classical culture complained of the dull and repetitive lessons they endured at school and university. For example, in a class on Homer at Yale in the 1883-4, the tutor 'never changed the monotonous routine, never made a remark, but simply called on individuals to recite or to scan, said "That will do," put down a mark; so that in the last recitation in June, after a whole college year of this intolerable classroom drudgery, I was surprised to hear him say, and again without any emphasis, "The poems of Homer are the greatest that have ever proceeded from the mind of man, class is dismissed"'. 2 Even as Arnold lamented the alienating effect of the text-based grind, innovations in learning and teaching classics were developing both inside and outside educational institutions. By the early years of the twentieth century, the idea that it would be possible to know who the Greeks and Romans were, and what they did, was reinvigorated by classicists exploring new areas of study, and by translators who sought to ensure that classical texts would be available to all readers.
2009
This volume assembles 15 essays, which reflect on the diverse and changing ways in which themes and phenomena of classi- cal antiquity were, have been, or should be, integrated into areas beyond Classics: in the study of political phenomena such as modern democracy and European integration; in the critical assessment of a historical period such as the Ancien Régime in France; in the shaping of a civil society in Germany at the time of the Enlightenment and in the formative phase of the United States; in the process of state formation in modern Greece and nineteenth-century Germany; in times of war and crisis; in education, science, or popular culture.
… Brevique Adnotatione Critica …: A Preliminary History of the Oxford Classical Texts
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 2013
On 3 July 1896, at one of the less regular meetings of the Delegates of Oxford University Press (OUP) held during the Long Vacation, 1 approval was given to publication of the Oxford Classical Texts (OCT) series. This approval was the outcome of discussions and proposals over more than ten years; indeed, it would be possible to take any one of several dates as marking the start of the series. While these earlier