“Atheism as a Devotional Category,” Republics of Letters 1: 2 (2010) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Being Godless: Ethnographies of Atheism and Non-Religion
Journal of Contemporary Religion, 2018
the churches as ‘the other’ of nineteenth-century scientific atheism. The main contemporary antagonists have in common that they challenge the ‘modern’ project of the scientistic ideology the New Atheists promote. Therefore, following LeDrew, the New Atheists are only superficially interested in criticising religion. Their most important agenda has been the legitimisation of scientific authority on the grounds of an evolutionistic ideology. Within the secular movement of the US, the emergence of the New Atheism caused conflict with other factions, for example, with the so-called “secular humanism” (145). LeDrew shows that the underlying tensions go back over a hundred years, since secular humanism has its own historical predecessors: the so-called “humanistic atheism” (25–27) emerged shortly after scientific atheism and took the latter’s denial of all supernatural claims for granted. Essentially, however, humanistic atheism is interested in the ongoing existence and social functioni...
Intellectual History Review, 2019
This article examines dictionaries and encyclopedias’ coverage of the term “atheism” in the anglophone world from the early modern period up until the twentieth century. The article recounts how most dictionary- and encyclopedia-makers often portrayed atheism as an irrational and immoral belief system, through their use of negative illustrative quotations or the idea of “atheism” as a denial of God. The article will also show how atheists responded to these dictionaries and encyclopedias, particularly by examining the alternative definition supplied in the middle of the nineteenth century by Charles Bradlaugh, the most important British atheist of the era.
Ninety-Eight Atheists: Atheism among the Non-Elite in Twentieth Century Britain
Widespread atheism in the general population is one of the defining characteristics of twentieth-century British society, yet until very recently, it has largely been unregarded by historians. This study attempts to contribute to the remedy of this omission by considering autobiographies and oral histories of non-elite atheists between 1890 and 1980. It shows that atheisation (the transition from religious belief to atheism) is principally a phenomenon of childhood and adolescence, with 80% of the sources becoming atheist by the age of twenty. The reasons the subjects gave for their irreligion were varied, of greatest significance were nearly two thirds who regarded religion as irrelevant to their lives, showing a lack of engagement with religion, its concepts and rituals. Many of these were from weakly religious or irreligious backgrounds who experienced ‘irreligious socialisation’, rendering religion irrelevant and contributed significantly to the progress of atheisation. Religious trauma, criticism of religion, personal trauma, radical politics, and rationalism accounted for similar proportions of reasons, and were mentioned by only 12–18% of sources. The potential influence of parental attitude to religion, other childhood experiences, religious education, reducing existential threat, historic events, and the social revolution of the 1960s are also considered as ‘unarticulated causes’ of the subjects’ irreligion.
Rethinking the Histories of Atheism, Unbelief, and Nonreligion: An Interdisciplinary Perspective
Global Intellectual History, 2019
With the number of atheists and nonreligious people at an all-time global high, scholars have become increasingly interested in the study of atheism, including its history. There is, however, disagreement about how best to conceptualise what is being studied. This article ventures to rethink the terminology we use to frame the field, and in particular the extent to which it can be applied beyond Western modernity. While ‘atheism’ or ‘unbelief’ are perhaps the most common ways to talk about this field, both fall short in various ways. ‘Atheism’ fails to grasp the diversity of religious unbelief by centring focus on the question of God’s existence. Even a term like ‘unbelief’, while getting around the narrowness of the term ‘atheism’, creates problems of its own, namely its emphasis on ‘belief’ as the defining aspect of religious experience. An alternative term – ‘nonreligion’ – might help us around this issue, but, while the term is broader than ‘atheism’ or ‘unbelief’, it too runs into difficulties, particularly the fact that it is parasitic upon the term ‘religion’, a category whose universal applicability has been called into question.
Varieties of Atheism, 2022
This introduction argues that defining atheism narrowly in terms of belief makes it into an abstraction that misrepresents atheism as it actually exists. To this end, I develop a brief genealogy of atheism - from the premodern period into the present - which indicates that atheism has encompassed ethical commitments, political aims, and emotional experiences. This expanded understanding opens the possibility of a complex conversation between particular forms of atheism and particular religious traditions - which is the possibility that this collection explores.