Cell-fate determination in the developing Drosophila eye: role of the rough gene (original) (raw)
Related papers
Cell-fate determination in the developing Drosophila eye: role of the rough gene
Development, 1991
The homeobox-gene rough is required in photoreceptor cells R2 and R5 for normal ommatidial assembly in the developing Drosophila eye. We have used several celltype-specific markers and double mutant combinations to analyze cell-fate determination in rough. We show that the cells that would normally become R2 and/or R5 express a marker, a lacZ insertion in the seven-up (svp) gene, which is indicative of the Rl/3/4/6 cell fate. In addition, the analysis of mitotically induced svp,ro double mutant clones in the eye indicates that in rough all outer photoreceptors are under the genetic control of the svp gene. These results show that, in the absence of rough function, R2 and R5 fail to be correctly determined and appear to be transformed into cells of the R3/4/1/6 subtype. This transformation and the subsequent developmental defects do not preclude the recruitment of R7 cells. However, the presence of ommatidia containing more than one R7 and/or R8 cell in rough implies a complex network of cellular interactions underlying cell-fate determination in the Drosophila retina
Mechanisms of Development, 2003
The roughest locus of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a transmembrane protein of the immunoglobulin superfamily required for several developmental processes, including axonal pathfinding in the developing optic lobe, mechanosensory bristle differentiation and myogenesis. In the compound eye, rst was previously shown to be required for establishing the correct number and spacing of secondary and tertiary pigment cells during the final steps of ommatidial assembly. We have further investigated its function in the developing pupal retina by performing a developmental and molecular analysis of a novel dominant rst allele, rst D . In addition to showing evidence that rst D is a regulatory mutant, the results strongly suggest a previously unnoticed role of the rst gene in the differentiation of secondary/tertiary pigment cell fate as well as establishing the correct timing of surplus cell removal by programmed cell death in the compound eye. q
Genes & Development, 1990
In the developing eye of Drosophila, the homeo box gene rough is required in the developing photoreceptor cells R2 and R5 for the correct development of the neighboring R3 and R4 cells. We have expressed rough ectopically in a limited subset of developing ommatidial cells using the sevenless enhancer. Expression of rough in the presumptive R7 cell transforms this cell into an R1-6 type photoreceptor. This transformation is cell autonomous in contrast to the apparent nonautonomy of the rough mutant phenotype and depends on the presence of the sevenless gene. We propose that in wild type, rough functions autonomously in the specification of R2/5 photoreceptor cell identity but by itself cannot initiate neural development.
Journal of Cell Science, 1990
Summary In the developing eye of Drosophila cell fate is controlled by a cascade of inductive interactions. Little is known about how the specificity of positional signalling is achieved such that directly adjacent progenitor cells reproducibly choose distinct developmental pathways. The determination of the R7 photoreceptor in each ommatidium depends on the presence of the sevenless protein which acts as a receptor for positional information on the R7 precursor. The rough gene encodes a homeodomain protein that plays an instructive role in the determination of the R3 and R4 photoreceptor cells. The use of ectopic expression of sevenless and rough has provided insight into the mechanisms of positional signalling and the normal function of rough. Ubiquitous expression of sevenless does not alter cell fate suggesting that the inducing signal is both spatially and temporally controlled. Conversely, ectopic expression of rough in the R7 precursor causes a transformation of R7 cells into...
Specification of cell fate in the developing eye ofDrosophila
BioEssays, 1991
Determination of cell fate in the developing eye of Drosophila depends on cellular interactions. In the eye imaginal disc, an initially unpatterned epithelial sheath of cells, single cells are specified in regular intervals to become the R8 photoreceptor cells. Genes such as Notch and scabrous participate in this process suggesting that specification of ommatidial founder cells and the formation of bristles in the adult epidermis involve a similar mechanism known as lateral inhibition. The subsequent steps of ommatidial assembly involve a different mechanism: undetermined cells read their position based on the contacts they make with neighbors that have already begun to differentiate. The development of the R7 photoreceptor cell is best understood. The key role seems to be played by sevenless, a receptor tyrosine kinase on the surface of the R7 precursor. It transmits the positional information-most likely encoded by boss on the neighboring R8 cell membraneinto the cell via its tyrosine kinase that activates a signal transduction cascade. Two components of this cascade-Sos and sina-have been identified genetically, sina encodes a nuclear protein whose expression is not limited to R7. Constitutive activation of the sevenless kinase by overexpression results in the diversion of other ommatidial cells into the R7 pathway, suggesting that activation of the sevenless signalling pathway is sufficient to specify R7 development.
orthodenticleIs Required for Photoreceptor Cell Development in the DrosophilaEye
Developmental Biology, 1996
Drosophila photoreceptor cells (R cells) develop from the eye imaginal disc during the third instar larval stage and acquire their adult morphology during pupation. We show that orthodenticle (otd), a homeobox gene, is required for R-cell morphogenesis during pupation. otd UV-insensitive (otd uvi ) is a hypomorphic allele of otd that only affects R-cell development. The Rcell rhabdomeres are disorganized in otd uvi , and there is a disruption of proximal-distal development in the eye. The otd genomic structure was determined and resulted in the identification of a deletion in the third intron of otd uvi . Sequences encompassing this deletion are able to direct expression of the lacZ reporter gene at all stages of the developing visual system, including the photosensitive cells of Bolwig's organ, the ocelli, and the adult eye. The third intron enhancer is the primary regulatory element controlling otd in the R cells and is not under the control of the glass gene.
Binary Cell Fate Decisions and Fate Transformation in the Drosophila Larval Eye
The functionality of sensory neurons is defined by the expression of specific sensory receptor genes. During the development of the Drosophila larval eye, photoreceptor neurons (PRs) make a binary choice to express either the blue- sensitive Rhodopsin 5 (Rh5) or the green-sensitive Rhodopsin 6 (Rh6). Later during metamorphosis, ecdysone signaling induces a cell fate and sensory receptor switch: Rh5-PRs are re-programmed to express Rh6 and become the eyelet, a small group of extraretinal PRs involved in circadian entrainment. However, the genetic and molecular mechanisms of how the binary cell fate decisions are made and switched remain poorly understood. We show that interplay of two transcription factors Senseless (Sens) and Hazy control cell fate decisions, terminal differentiation of the larval eye and its transformation into eyelet. During initial differentiation, a pulse of Sens expression in primary precursors regulates their differentiation into Rh5-PRs and repression of an alternative Rh6-cell fate. Later, during the transformation of the larval eye into the adult eyelet, Sens serves as an anti-apoptotic factor in Rh5-PRs, which helps in promoting survival of Rh5-PRs during metamorphosis and is subsequently required for Rh6 expression. Comparably, during PR differentiation Hazy functions in initiation and maintenance of rhodopsin expression. Hazy represses Sens specifically in the Rh6-PRs, allowing them to die during metamorphosis. Our findings show that the same transcription factors regulate diverse aspects of larval and adult PR development at different stages and in a context-dependent manner.
Patterning of cells in the Drosophila eye by Lozenge, which shares homologous domains with AML1
Genes & Development, 1996
The lozenge (lz) gene encodes a transcription factor involved in prepatterning photoreceptor precursors in the developing Drosophila eye. The central region of the predicted Lz protein product is homologous to AML1, a transcription factor associated with human leukemias, and to the Drosophila protein Runt. We show here that Lz plays a crucial role in governing the fate of two groups of cells that are born in a single round of mitosis in the larval eye disc. Lz helps define a subset of these cells as an equipotential group that is competent to respond to the Sevenless developmental signal. This is achieved by negative regulation of seven-up, a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily in these cells. In contrast, in a second group of cells, the Lz protein confers proper photoreceptor identity by positively regulating the homeo box gene Bar. Additionally, our genetic analysis suggests that Lz interacts with the Ras pathway to determine photoreceptor cell fate. This study sugg...
Genetics, 2002
The regular organization of the ommatidial lattice in the Drosophila eye originates in the precise regulation of the proneural gene atonal (ato), which is responsible for the specification of the ommatidial founder cells R8. Here we show that Rough eye (Roi), a dominant mutation manifested by severe roughening of the adult eye surface, causes defects in ommatidial assembly and ommatidial spacing. The ommatidial spacing defect can be ascribed to the irregular distribution of R8 cells caused by a disruption of the patterning of ato expression. Disruptions in the recruitment of other photoreceptors and excess Hedgehog production in differentiating cells may further contribute to the defects in ommatidial assembly. Our molecular characterization of the Roi locus demonstrates that it is a gain-of-function mutation of the bHLH gene amos that results from a chromosomal inversion. We show that Roi can rescue the retinal developmental defect of ato1 mutants and speculate that amos substitute...