Aysu Akalin, ... Architecture and engineering students’ .....pdf (original) (raw)
Related papers
A B S T R A C T Architects and non-architects have different perceptions, and assume differently. Previous studies show that uniqueness, Novelty and originality depend significantly on the general aesthetics in the view of non-architects. Also, moderate complexity has been chosen as the most favorable complexity. This study aims at bringing together the architectural and non-architectural perception and also understanding the non-architects' significant criteria related to the aesthetics of the façade design. This research focuses on understanding the aesthetic differences and the relation between aesthetics and complexity in residential façades using qualitative methodology in Iran. The data have been collected using interview techniques and analyzed using content analysis.61 architects and 59 non-architects were examined. The results reveal that among the conceptual properties, properties such as simplicity and uniqueness are common to both architects and non-architects, however, there are differences that needs to be taken into consideration. The relation of complexity, as one of the most important conceptual properties, to aesthetics was examined; and it was revealed that medium complexity is the complexity level that satisfies both groups, and low complexity and high complexity are not so favorable. It is concluded that complexity plays a major role for non-architects when it comes to aesthetic judgments of a building.
Complexity and Liking in Façades of Houses
This study aims to see the local residents of Kahramanmaraş who are not in the design profession, to know how they find connotative meanings in house styles concerning different cultures and to see how these meanings differ according to socio-demographic qualities. It is hypothesized that foreign examples would be preferred as a 'social status' indication compare to the domestic ones which might be considered as 'warm'. Regarding this, a total o f 102 respondents, c o m p o s e d o f middle-aged people (25 female, 26 male) and students (25 female, 26 male) have evaluated the façades of 12 houses through using five-point semantic differential scales under four headings: Familiarity, Impressiveness, Complexity and Liking. The results have shown that different styles with different forms, elements and materials have been evaluated differently by the respondent groups. While the most impressive foreign vernacular examples were defined as the 'social status' indication, the most familiar local vernacular examples were indicated as the 'warmest' house façades. Amongst these results, it was also noted that the students a p p r e c i a t e d the foreign vernacular examples and found them attractive than the middle age respondents.
Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019
The aim of this study is to define aesthetic differences between architects' and non-architects' perspectives by considering the cognitive properties of residential buildings' facades located in Iran. Accordingly, in order to observe perceptional similarities and differences between designers and users, the aesthetics of residential facades is investigated in Tehran, Iran, through a comprehensive case study. A quantitative method was used in the form of a questionnaire, and the corresponding data is further analyzed by SPSS software. Although architects' and non-architects' perspectives are somewhat similar in selecting and evaluating the chosen facade, corresponding findings reveal significant differences as well. The results further show that the classic architectural style was not appealing for the architects. Moreover, non-architects and architects think that 'uniqueness' is the most effective parameter; while architects believe that 'pleasantness' has the highest influence among the presumed six parameters in selecting the best facade. Furthermore, the outcomes indicate that the studied groups have some conflicting viewpoints about aesthetics, while there would be some similarities about the unfavorable facades. In this regard, the non-architects' standpoints, preferences, and satisfaction should be assumed during the design procedure. This research can open a new perspective on the architect's perception in the early design stage.
Ebru Erdogan, Aysu Akalin, .... Students’ evaluations of different architectural styles.pdf
This paper indicates how the quantitative analysis of architectural representations can be used to identify both dissimilarities and commonalities in individuals' construes of architecture. Particularly, this paper has focused on the image of different architectural styles and their interpretation by architecture students at different stages of architectural education. As shown in the paper, first year architecture students as new learners perceived examples differently than senior last year architecture students as prearchitects. These interpretations were investigated using multiple sorting techniques, with respondents asked to sort 21 examples of different architecture styles according to their own criteria.
The Effect of Architectural Forms on Aesthetic Response : Study Case
Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research, 2021
This research seeks to identify building exterior characteristics that are best liked, most pleasing, rated beautiful and exciting by architects. A methodology based on mixed research methods was developed. The study sought architect’s preferences for twelve different public buildings. Analysis of 68 responses to the survey questionnaire identified several building’s exteriors characteristics that were consistently most preferred aesthetically. Four formal attributes. Complexity, Order, Ambiguity, and Potency, each of which was measured by three variables, and one variable added to the ambiguity, so a total of 13 formal (cognitive / perceptual) variables were included in the study. The effects of these attributes on affective responses, i.e., Arousal and Evaluation, each of which was measured by three variables, were examined. The analysis of the scatter chart identifies the level of association between two dependent variables, aesthetic response and formal features. A medium to a s...
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1989
This research examined differences between the features of 'high' and 'popular' style residential architecture and between responses to those styles by architects and nonarchitects. Forty slides (20 of each style) were scored in terms of physical properties. They were also rated by 20 architects and 20 non-architects. The research identified distinct physical features of each style. 'High' style residential architecture had fewer materials, more concrete, simpler forms, more white, and off-center entrances. They were judged as more complex, novel, and exciting. 'Popular' style residential architecture was characterized by use of more building materials, horizontal orientation, hip roofs, framed windows, centered entrances, and warm colors. Architects and nonarchitects differed in how they characterized and evaluated the two kinds of buildings, Architects rated the 'high' buildings as more clear, coherent pleasant, relaxing, and meaningful. Models of preference revealed that both groups favored novelty and coherence (or clarity), but the non-architects favored simplicity and 'popular' attributes, while the architects favored complexity and 'high' attributes. * To whom all correspondence should be sent. The authors would like to thank Dale F. Bertsch for his insightful comments on this research.
The Relationship of Complexity and Order in Determining Aesthetic Preference in Architectural Form
Architectural research, 2011
The concept of complexity has been at the center of aesthetic theories not only in architecture but also in numerous fields such as experimental psychology, environmental psychology, and urban and landscape planning. Many psychological studies demonstrate that humans prefer relatively complex patterns in their visual field. Furthermore, The overall finding in this area of research is that there is an optimal range of perceptual input, such that both overly simple and chaotically complex visual fields are disliked. According to the studies in the field of experimental and environmental psychology, stimulus complexity is one of the critical properties which determines the aesthetic quality of visual stimuli. The existing literature suggests that some degree of ambiguity and complexity are necessary for accomplishing a visually appropriate environment because they help to achieve an optimal perceptual rate which is related to richness and diversity of perceptual input. Even though complexity might not be a primary concern for
Evaluation of Conceptual Properties by Layperson in Residential Façade Designs
Arts and Design Studies, 2012
When it comes to aesthetic evaluation of a design, architects and non-architects differ from each other. This study demonstrates how aesthetic evaluation of buildings could be predicted. These predictions are important for architects as they can be used to find the users preferences and expectations of the design. Preference is considered to involve conceptual evaluation about whether the design is liked or disliked. In environmental preference, this type of conceptual evaluation might be conscious or unconscious. The aim of this study is to identify the essential conceptual properties that are related to aesthetic evaluation of façade designs using qualitative methodology. As a result it can be concluded that not all the conceptual properties are related to aesthetic evaluation of the design. Some conceptual properties are not important from the eye of non-architects and some are highly important. Findings of this research could help architects to understand the perception of non-architects.