Kaj Sandberg, 'Tribunician and non-tribunician legislation in Mid-Republican Rome': Christer Bruun (ed.), The Roman Middle Republic. Politics, Religion and Historiography, c. 400–133 BC. Papers from a Conference at the IRF, September 11–12, 1998 (ActaIRF 23), Rome 2000, 121–140. (original) (raw)
Related papers
century 8C.10 Whether authentic or not, which of course is impossible to establish, it proves that the most erudite of the Roman antiquarians did not hesitate 5 See chapter 2.2.1. 6 For discussion and extensive bibliography on the .lex sacrata de tribunorum plebei potestate et sacrosanctitate" (as Flach narnes it), see Flach, GFRR,[74][75][76][77][78][79] Rotondi, LPPR, [189][190][191] Flach, Liv. 4.30.3: Legem cle multarum aestimatione pergratampopulo cum ab tribunis parari consules unius ex collegio prodirioneexcepissenl,ipsipraeoccupaveruntferre.öt.ci.. rep.2.60:levisaestumatiopecuduminmultalegeC'lulii P. Papirii consulum constituta est. e See esp. Liv.2.41.1-3 and Dion. Ha:^. anr. g.69-'79. However, it should be duly noted thataccording to one traclition-Sp. Cassiusproposedhis agrarianbill in the capacity astibunus pleåis (Val. Max 5'8'2): Sp' Cassium' qui tribunuspl.agrariamIegemprimuslulerat.ForananalysisofthetraditionontheCassianbill,seeM Basile''Analisi e valore della tradizion e sulli rogatio cassia agraria clel 486 a.c.' , Miscellanea greca e romana 6 (1978), 277 -298 ' see also F. D,lppolito, 'La legge airaria di Spurio Cassio', Labeo2l (19'15), 197-210; J. Gagö, '"Rogatio p12sgili3" La querelle agromilitaire uutJul d.-golu., .n 416 av. J . -C., et la probable signification des projets agraires de Sp Cassius, vers 486" Latomus 3S (1979), 838-861 and D. capanelli, 'Appunti sulla rogatio agraria di Spurio cassio" Legge e societöl (1981),3-50. Full bibliography in Flach, GFR'R' 84 f' r0 The report is founcl in a passage of Macrobius (Sat. 1.13.21), quoted at p. 60. 118 KAJ SANDBERG
The Laws of the Roman People. Public Law in the Expansion and Decline of the Roman Republic
~ FROM 350 TO 44, hundreds of public lawInKing assemblies-whether ing with issues urgently important or to modllll observers seemingly unimpor tant, commlll1itywide in scope or narrowly rocusdon an individual or group--were held in Rome on an apparently infrequent anJ irregular basis. Culminating a process that was at all times cumbersome andime-consuming, from our twen tieth-century perspective, that invariably demaJded from its participants knowl edge of the most intricate details of Roman pilcedures and customs, and that regularly involved participants from members lithe citizenry on all levels, publawmaking assemblies endured throughout de rapidly changing circumstances of the Roman Republic. Only the Romans fu~!< understood the circumstances that called for a political leader to convene the people in a public lawmaking assembly. That each generation had a different;ense of the appropriate circum stances attests to the resiliency and depth of the process in Roman society. The range of individuals with the authority to call ~blic lawmaking a'iSemblies, the range of groups involved in determining the Oulcome, and the number of occa sitms during the public lawmaking process in Rome on which participants had an opportunity to influence the outcome under~ore importance of lawmak ing in Roman society for hundreds of years.
Constitutional Thought in the Late Roman Republic
Emergency powers are widely held to have contributed in important ways to the Roman Republic's demise and to the erection of the Principate. The debate waged during the late Republic over such powers is certainly one of the most prominent features in late Republican political thought and controversy, and it would be hard to overlook the fact that it was a debate over constitutional principle. Taking seriously the constitutional character of that debate, this article seeks to answer the question of whether it makes sense to attribute to the Roman Republic something like the concept of a constitution in the first place. It is argued that on the level of political thought the term 'constitution' can indeed profitably and accurately be applied to a set of rules that were thought both to be more entrenched and to be more important than other rules. Thus it makes perfect sense to speak of a Roman Republican constitution, without scare quotes, at least in the realm of political thought. Furthermore it is suggested that it makes sense to speak of a Roman republican constitution in the realm of institutional reality as well since political and more specifically constitutional thought informed and influenced some of the republican institutions and their functioning to a considerable extent.
A LEGAL HISTORY OF ROME, CHAPTER 5: THE LATE REPUBLIC: THE SOURCES OF LAW
A LEGAL HISTORY OF ROME, 2007
This chapter examines the development of Roman law during the late Republican age. In this period Roman law broke through the barrier of formalism and was secularized and internationalized. It formed a highly flexible system that could constantly adapt to the requirements of social and commercial life.
Public Law and Republican Empire in Rome, 200 - 27 BCE
Edward Cavanagh, ed., Empire and Legal Thought: Ideas and Institutions from Antiquity to Modernity, 2020
The paper traces the emergent project of empire at Rome from the end of the Hannibalic War to the foundation of the Principate. It focuses on the role of law in this process, tracing the passage of Roman diplomacy from a period in which Rome sought to bind networks of parties in bilateral alliances to one in which Rome used grants of recognition to favored allies to extend the reach of its control over provincial landscapes.