CARBARISM: CIVILISING THE AUTOMOBILE (original) (raw)
Instead of a debate about whether the automobile is good or bad, this article will argue that it is more useful to carefully consider how the automobile should live in its natural environment in a way that is compatible with human development. We should, I will argue, now develop a framework to civilize the automobile. Civilization is probably harder to define in a positive sense than in a negative one; i.e. what goes against civilization is generally easier to agree upon that what advances it. Thus, I offer the concept of 'carbarism'. This is not meant to be a blanket epithet but a rubric for identifying social and economic applications of the automobile that could be said to be 'barbaric' in the sense of degrading human civilization, and hence to be avoided. Technology is never neutral with respect to society. Its contribution to civilization can just as easily be negative as positive. Any technology should to be introduced into the wild (so to speak) in a way that ensures that civilization is advanced along with technical progress. The automobile thus far has been simultaneously social advancer and destroyer but it is not too late to begin to civilize the automobile. Some of this involves undoing, slowly, design and institutional mistakes of the past. Some of this involves progressing technological advancement of automobility in a way different from that of the past. But whatever moves may be made the advance of civilization in a broad sense and the avoidance of barbaric uses of the car (carbarism) should be kept front and centre.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
The lock-in escape of a carbon-dependent transportation technology requires the full understanding of the factors that caused the lock-in at the turn of the 20th century. Most literature about the phenomenon is descriptive and lacks theoretical strength. An evolutionary view based on Darwin’s concepts of variety generation, the struggle for existence, coevolution and natural selection is offered as a theoretical framework to address the lock-in, which can be generalised to other types of innovation in the presence technological competition. This study uses a historical methodology to analyse and interpret narrative sources. Evidence suggests that the competing technologies were not ‘better’ or ‘worse’ per se, but environmental changes transformed technological varieties into advantages or disadvantages in the technological race and selected a prevailing standard.
Origin of car enthusiasm and alternative paths in history
Origin of car enthusiasm and alternative paths in history, 2019
How can we explain the formidable success of the car all over the world? It is suggested here that the historical origin is key to the root of this enthusiasm. From a climate change mitigation perspective car culture is a difficult problem, but why is that so? This paper presents a framework of interpretation based on the literature of the birth of the American car culture about one hundred years ago. Agency, not the least on the part of the user, technological choice, and industrial links are emphasized and put together in a framework called "forks and links". This framework is tested as a narrative in the second part of the paper. It is argued that the car belongs to a product category with which active users can change their lives, while fuel and propulsion is just an input. A desired capacity for touring was decisive in the choice between gasoline and electric cars.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
"Mediatization of the automobile"
Olivier Driessens, Göran Bolin, Andreas Hepp and Stig Hjarvard, eds. Dynamics of Mediatization: Institutional Change and Everyday Transformations in a Digital Age. London: Palgrave, 2017.