People who undergo revision arthroplasty report more limitations but no decrease in physical activity compared with primary total hip arthroplasty: an observational study (original) (raw)

Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity

Pierre Hoffmeyer

The Journal of rheumatology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Risk Factors for Early Revision After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Alex Bottle

Arthritis Care & Research, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of clinical characteristics and 10-year survival rates of revision hip arthroplasties among revision time groups

ahmet sevencan

Archives of Medical Science

View PDFchevron_right

Total hip arthroplasties: What are the reasons for revision

James Stiehl

International Orthopaedics, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013

MELBIN THOMAS

The Journal of arthroplasty, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Patient Characteristics Influence Revision Rate of Total Hip Arthroplasty: American Society of Anesthesiologists Score and Body Mass Index Were the Strongest Predictors for Short-Term Revision After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Rinne Peters

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Demographic biases found in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplasty

Robert Barrack

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1996

View PDFchevron_right

ASA class is associated with early revision and reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the Geneva and Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registries

Ola Rolfson

Acta Orthopaedica

View PDFchevron_right

A comparative study of patients presenting for planned and unplanned revision hip or knee arthroplasty

Farag Shuweihdi

The Bone & Joint Journal

View PDFchevron_right

Waiting for hip revision surgery: the impact on patient disability

Khaled Saleh

Canadian Journal of Surgery Journal Canadien De Chirurgie, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 80 Years or Older

Pierre Hoffmeyer

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Redefining Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Hospital Admission Status

Wendy Novicoff

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Assessing the comparability of hip arthroplasty registries in order to improve the recording and monitoring of outcome

Deborah Marshall

The Bone & Joint Journal, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Quality of outcome data in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 5 decades

Andrea Berghold

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Which patients improve most after total hip arthroplasty? Influence of patient characteristics on patient-reported outcome measures of 22,357 total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

Rinne Peters

HIP International, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Early Mortality after Modern Total Hip Arthroplasty

Luis Pulido

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty

Nikolaus Böhler, Gerold Labek

International Orthopaedics, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Elena Losina

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

View PDFchevron_right

Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data

Nikolaus Böhler, Rauend Rauf, Reinhard Schuh

International Orthopaedics, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Consistency in patient-reported outcomes after total hip replacement

Ola Rolfson

Acta Orthopaedica, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Advanced Age and Comorbidity Increase the Risk for Adverse Events After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Karl Koenig, William Maloney

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register

Henrik Malchau

Acta Orthopaedica, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 35 Years: A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Rachelle Morgenstern

Arthroplasty Today, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Do Commonly Reported Outcome Measures Reflect Patient Satisfaction After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?

Henrik Malchau

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register : 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003

Ove Furnes, Jon Arne Søreide

Acta Orthopaedica, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Is the Revision Rate Higher After Hip Arthroplasty in Teenage Patients? A Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up of More Than 10 Years

Kalaivanan Kanniyan, Ramalingam Raj

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Factors That Predict Short-term Complication Rates After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Jay Lieberman

Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Evolution of disability in adults with hip arthroplasty: A national longitudinal study

I. Boutron, Philippe Ravaud

Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Impact of hip arthroplasty registers on orthopaedic practice and perspectives for the future

Ola Rolfson

EFORT Open Reviews

View PDFchevron_right