People who undergo revision arthroplasty report more limitations but no decrease in physical activity compared with primary total hip arthroplasty: an observational study (original ) (raw )Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity
Pierre Hoffmeyer
The Journal of rheumatology, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Risk Factors for Early Revision After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Alex Bottle
Arthritis Care & Research, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of clinical characteristics and 10-year survival rates of revision hip arthroplasties among revision time groups
ahmet sevencan
Archives of Medical Science
View PDFchevron_right
Total hip arthroplasties: What are the reasons for revision
James Stiehl
International Orthopaedics, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013
MELBIN THOMAS
The Journal of arthroplasty, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Patient Characteristics Influence Revision Rate of Total Hip Arthroplasty: American Society of Anesthesiologists Score and Body Mass Index Were the Strongest Predictors for Short-Term Revision After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
Rinne Peters
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Demographic biases found in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplasty
Robert Barrack
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1996
View PDFchevron_right
ASA class is associated with early revision and reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the Geneva and Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registries
Ola Rolfson
Acta Orthopaedica
View PDFchevron_right
A comparative study of patients presenting for planned and unplanned revision hip or knee arthroplasty
Farag Shuweihdi
The Bone & Joint Journal
View PDFchevron_right
Waiting for hip revision surgery: the impact on patient disability
Khaled Saleh
Canadian Journal of Surgery Journal Canadien De Chirurgie, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 80 Years or Older
Pierre Hoffmeyer
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Redefining Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Hospital Admission Status
Wendy Novicoff
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Assessing the comparability of hip arthroplasty registries in order to improve the recording and monitoring of outcome
Deborah Marshall
The Bone & Joint Journal, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Quality of outcome data in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 5 decades
Andrea Berghold
Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Which patients improve most after total hip arthroplasty? Influence of patient characteristics on patient-reported outcome measures of 22,357 total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
Rinne Peters
HIP International, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Early Mortality after Modern Total Hip Arthroplasty
Luis Pulido
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty
Nikolaus Böhler , Gerold Labek
International Orthopaedics, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
Elena Losina
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
View PDFchevron_right
Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data
Nikolaus Böhler , Rauend Rauf , Reinhard Schuh
International Orthopaedics, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Consistency in patient-reported outcomes after total hip replacement
Ola Rolfson
Acta Orthopaedica, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Advanced Age and Comorbidity Increase the Risk for Adverse Events After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Karl Koenig , William Maloney
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register
Henrik Malchau
Acta Orthopaedica, 2001
View PDFchevron_right
Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 35 Years: A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes
Rachelle Morgenstern
Arthroplasty Today, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Do Commonly Reported Outcome Measures Reflect Patient Satisfaction After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
Henrik Malchau
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register : 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003
Ove Furnes , Jon Arne Søreide
Acta Orthopaedica, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Is the Revision Rate Higher After Hip Arthroplasty in Teenage Patients? A Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up of More Than 10 Years
Kalaivanan Kanniyan , Ramalingam Raj
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Factors That Predict Short-term Complication Rates After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Jay Lieberman
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Evolution of disability in adults with hip arthroplasty: A national longitudinal study
I. Boutron , Philippe Ravaud
Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Impact of hip arthroplasty registers on orthopaedic practice and perspectives for the future
Ola Rolfson
EFORT Open Reviews
View PDFchevron_right