URBAN DREAMS AND REALITIES: REMAINS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ANCIENT CITY (original) (raw)
Related papers
Questioning the Centrality of Urbanism in the Early Historic Landscape of the Southern Deccan
Handbook on Urban History of Early India, 2024
In South Asia, the Early Historic city is considered the locus of increasing socio-political, economic, and religious complexity from the 6th century BCE and is seen as one of the defining characteristics of this period. The chapter begins with a discussion of the varied definitions of the city and the ways in which historical or archaeological perspectives have shaped our study of urbanism. We examine how early cities have been defined as either a distinct physical form or as a suite of cultural and material practices. Although considered crucial to our understanding of the Early Historic, the early city is not well defined and leads to questions about the centrality of this settlement form in all regions. Moving to a consideration of long-term micro histories in north Karnataka, we argue that while certain settlements were connected to urban societies through trade and other networks, they did not necessarily form part of a regional settlement pattern that included urban centres. We suggest other factors, such as iron production, independent domestication, and water management can be considered independently of the urban form. This chapter therefore questions the privileging of the idea of urbanism, and suggests that in fact, some regions may have stayed small scale over time as a sustainable choice.
Cities in India: an archaeological perspective
2015
This chapter looks at cities in India from an archaeological perspective, taking their material aspects as a focal point. Drawing on the work of Gordon Childe and other archaeologists, in the first section a set of criteria is outlined by which a settlement may be defined as a city; these include the extensiveness of the site, its clear physical demarcation from the surrounding area, the existence of monumental architecture for a public purpose and evidence of the existence of specialised craft industries, etc. The chapter goes on to discuss several sites in light of these criteria, beginning with cities in proto-historic India in the first period of urbanisation and moving on to examine settlements in the second period of urbanisation-over 1,000 years later-in early historic north India and in southern India, where the second period of urbanisation occurred later still. The closing section of this chapter comments briefly on the possibility of a connected cultural development process in India using the evidence provided by black and red ware, a type of pottery. What in archaeological terms constitutes a city? Archaeology is the study of human cultures based on material evidence, and thus when cities are viewed from an archaeological perspective their material aspects form the main focal point. Gordon Childe, one of the world's most influential archaeologists, listed ten criteria for a settlement to qualify as a city, and these are still referred to today as a classic example of the 'definition' of a city (Childe 1950). As a result of the stress he placed on the ideological aspects of urbanisation, Childe's criteria are somewhat complex and may appear to be a mixed bag of multifaceted features. Childe coined the term 'Urban Revolution' and claimed that it was the second critical and revolutionary turning point in the history of mankind, after the 'Neolithic Revolution'. He remains highly influential, and many other archaeologists, including Shaffer (1993) and Allchin (1995), have formulated their idea of the city based on Childe's criteria. In this chapter the criteria put forward by Childe and other archaeologists are elaborated upon and summarised into several materially discernible elements to be used as benchmarks in distinguishing between a city and a village in the examination of archaeological sites. Before beginning the main body of this chapter, an important point must be made regarding the significance of focusing on material evidence alone. With
2018
While the earliest urban centres emerged in the third millennium BCE in the northwestern parts of the subcontinent, most of these cities and towns were abandoned around 1900 BCE. After a gap of nearly 1400 years, urban centres re-emerged not just in the northwest but also in the Gangetic valley in north India around 500 BCE. The term ‘Early Historic’ refers to a chronological period spanning in north India from approximately 500 BCE till about 500 CE. In contrast to the northwest, numerous Early Historic urban centres emerged in north India and many of these have been excavated. Despite the large number of excavations, we know far less about the Early Historic urban centres as compared to what we know of the Harappan cities. This lacuna is largely related to the kind of excavations that have been carried at most of these Early Historic sites. What is even more noteworthy is that even though nearly forty years ago, Amalananda Ghosh in the preface of his book, The City in Early Histor...
ARCHAEOLOGY AT SISUPALGARH: THE CHRONOLOGY OF AN EARLY HISTORIC URBAN CENTRE IN EASTERN INDIA
The ancient city of Sisupalgarh in eastern India shows a long-term archaeological record of urbanism in the Early Historic period (3rd century BCE – 4th century CE). Sustained occupation during the period of the Kalinga War supports a model of urban resilience at times of documented political conflict. The paper also introduces a new chronological framing of social complexity in South Asia through the identification of an “Initial Urban Phase” from the 8th-4th centuries BCE.
The politics and historicity of megalithic places in early South India
Journal of Social Archaeology, 2023
This paper considers the intersections of memorialization practices and politics throughout a period of emergent social differentiation during the Neolithic and Iron Age periods in the Deccan region of southern India. Rather than focus on how mortuary architecture and grave assemblages might correlate with the status, rank, or class of the deceased individuals—as has often been suggested—we place emphasis on how mortuary practices and the production of megalithic places contributed to the establishment and maintenance of social collectives among living communities. More specifically, we identify at least two modes of political practice associated with megalithic production in pre- historic South India: one related to the constitution of collectives of labor and shared consumption activities involved in the process of making monuments; and a second related to the material legacy of monuments in constituting cultural and historical places of social affiliation. In making these arguments about the social significance of megalithic places, we also critically consider new materialist and posthumanist theoretical frame- works in archaeology.
The Archaeology of South Asian Cities
Urbanism in the Indian subcontinent occurred in three distinct time periods in which cultural cohesion over large regions is archaeologically demonstrated through the architecture and artifacts of social, ritual, and economic activity. In the Indus (2500–1900 B.C.) and Early Historic (3rd century B.C. to 4th century A.D.) periods, cities were not necessarily tied to political territories or guided by strong political leaders, but by the Medieval period (after the 9th century A.D.), urban zones were the base for political growth, warfare, and aggrandizement. The comparison of these three eras is undertaken within a framework for defining cities that balances quantitative criteria such as population size and areal extent with two types of qualitative criteria: internal specialization on the basis of materials found within archaeological sites, and external specialization on the basis of data recovered through regional analysis. Cities from the three eras also are evaluated from the perspective of the ordinary inhabitant through the examination of the social, religious, and economic factors that prompted and rewarded urban residence. While the Indus and Early Historic cities were attractive because of the networks of opportunity found there, Medieval cities additionally benefitted from a "push" factor as ordinary inhabitants allied themselves to urban areas in times of political stress and uncertainty.