Shared Understandings in e-Science Projects: A report from the 'Embedding e-Science Applications: Designing and Managing for Usability' project (original) (raw)
Related papers
Communication and Collaboration in e-Science Projects
2010
Collaborative projects, such as e-Science projects producing software and tools to support the work of scientists, involve the management and coordination of work of a wide range of personnel, and also involve these personnel working together on joint activities. Effective communication practices are essential for the success of e-Science projects, for a number of reasons and in a number of different senses. For instance, there will be many one-way transfers of information, such as project management informing new personnel of the project’s vision and goals, the communication of work plans (including individuals’ roles, the model of software development employed by the project, timescales and deadlines) from those who have created them to those expected to execute them, and the presentation of work by an individual or team to their colleagues. Such transfers of information may in turn give rise to further communication. This transfer of information can give rise to further communication, including the giving of feedback, for instance whether a software developer feels that the tasks they have been assigned are realistically achievable, and requests for clarification. Communication may also take the form of negotiations or discussions. These could be regarding either day-to-day issues, for instance a team prioritising the tasks they need to complete and dividing work amongst team members, or higher-level issues such as seeking to define the project's overall vision, or constructing an overall plan of work. The large-scale, multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional, geographically-distributed, and sometimes international nature of e-Science projects, however, frequently impedes the establishment of effective communication practices. One major reason is that their distributed nature necessitates the frequent use of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs, such as e-mail, telephone, and Instant Messaging). It has often been reported that ICTs often do not afford the same richness of communication as face-to-face communication (de Rooij et al. 2007), or can be beset by technological difficulties (Olson & Olson 2000). Because the impact of ICTs upon effective communication practices has thus been widely considered in the existing literature, this paper will instead consider the impact of a variety of other issues which impede communication flows. Through qualitative case studies of e-Science projects, this paper aims to highlight some issues arising in these e-Science projects that may impede successful communication flows amongst project partners, and to provide recommendations for addressing these issues. These recommendations will often be based upon methods employed in the case studies when they have proved successful. It is hoped that they will prove very useful to Principal Investigators and Project Managers of existing and future e-Science projects in establishing communication practices that contribute to the success of their projects.
Results from a Multidisciplinary Case Study
2012
A major challenge for ubiquitous system design is creating applications that are legal-compatible and accepted by their intended users. Today's European data protection principles contradict the ideas of ubiquitous computing. Additionally, users have to deal with unconventional interaction concepts leading to a low amount of trust and acceptance in such systems. Current development approaches do not sufficiently cover these concerns, as they do not systematically incorporate expertise from the relevant disciplines. We present a novel development approach for ubiquitous systems that explicitly addresses these concerns. Our primary task was to manage the increased number of stakeholders and dependencies, respectively conflicts between requirements of the particular disciplines. The approach incorporates predefined artifacts and a defined workflow with responsibilities, as well as suggesting how to develop mutual understanding. We apply this multidisciplinary approach to develop th...
Theme: Title: Multi-stakeholder collaboration: The CIFE iRoom
2014
Abstract: The CIFE iRoom is a collection of linked software and hardware that allows users to readily structure, display and manipulate the various information used to design and implement a large construction project. The objectives of this research are to define and evaluate new ways for project teams to interact with and visualize project information to facilitate fast and effective decision-making. This paper summarizes the CIFE iRoom infrastructure and gives examples of its use. It shows the importance of separating a model from its view and from its control and of visualizing relationships across different views to conveniently view and compare alternative states of a project model simultaneously.
Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2010
Design-oriented IS research aims at delivering results which are of scientific rigor and of practical relevance at the same time. Recently, a number of guidelines have emerged helping researchers to do design-oriented IS research. However, these guidelines lack of supporting the researcher in gaining access to and capturing knowledge from the practitioner community. This paper proposes a method for Consortium Research, a multilateral form of collaborative research in which practitioners grant researchers access to their knowledge, collaborate in the specification of solutions, test artifacts in their business environments, and finance the research activities.
Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Knowledge Management, 2012
The task of this paper is to apply the selected aspects of knowledge management in the field of collaboration in science and research, which is marked by high level of knowledge specialisation. However, specialized knowledge becomes productive only if combined into a single, comprehensive knowledge, which creates the need for scientific and research cooperation. Within the framework of cooperation, attention is paid to the so-called collaboratories, with their role being shifted from attempts of sharing tools towards sharing of scientific data and the related knowledge. It is emphasized that the latest technical cooperation instruments can not overcome the problems, if there is not enough attention paid to working with people and to their motivation to collaboration. In practical terms, the paper describes implementation of KM expertise to the selected collaboratory of KNIHA SK, focusing on rescue, stabilization and preservation of traditional information media in Slovakia using the scientific method of knowledge auditing. The general recommendations and examples from the knowledge audit's implementation have been adjusted to match the environment of scientific research and cooperation and they were applied to a sample of about 100 members of the collaboratory. The results of the knowledge audit focused mainly on the deficiencies found out are quite material and hence described in more detail. Since the KNIHA SK collaboratory project was the final stage, making recommendations for the collaboratory in question was no longer a priority, but, on the contrary, the challenge was to propose general recommendations for the management of inter-institutional scientific collaboration. Such preparatory phase should be seen as one of the most important stages of a collaboratory's life and sufficient time should be allocated for preparation and adoption of common standards, confidentiality agreements should be entered into with all members of the collaboratory, and the focus should be set on the quality of the knowledge organization of the aspects of information ecology.
Computers & Education, 2005
Since the early 1990s, the CSCL community has elaborated a theoretical and methodological framework for conducting research involving the design of learning environments, the design research paradigm (e.g., . According to this paradigm, theory not only serves as the source for the design of environments, but is also its object as experiments conducted with the tools elaborated not only lead to a re-design of the tools but to theoretical progression. Initial theory is generally expressed in the form of principles that dictate the design of a Wrst learning environment. Research on the use of this environment helps not only to improve the design of the environment to lead to better learning outcomes, but also in the reWnement of the theory and in the articulation of new research questions and perspectives. The eVorts needed to undertake research design projects are huge, as such projects involve multiple agents (educational psychologists, designers, computer scientists, educators, teachers, students, decision makers, etc.) for a period that generally ranges between two and four years.
Cross-Cultural Scientific Collaboration Case Studies
2011
This paper describes case studies and lessons learned from cross-cultural scientific collaborations. A computer scientist was embedded within domain settings to design and develop systems for geological core drilling and medical hand-off. While these domains seem diverge and have different purposes and workflows, one common theme emerged from reflection analysis. They all heavily depend on "observable artifacts" in early if not all iterations of design and development cycles. Utilizing the common and different signature characteristics would help identifying and taking the proper strategies for different phases of future scientific collaboration projects.