ПЛОХИЙ С. РУССКИЙ ВАВИЛОН: ДОМОДЕРНЫЕ ИДЕНТИЧНОСТИ В РОССИИ, УКРАИНЕ И БЕЛАРУСИ ПЛАХIЙ С. Рускi Вавiлон: Дамадэрныя iдентичнасцi у` Расii, Украiне i Беларусi. – 2-е выд., папрауленае. – Смаленск: Iнбел- культ, 2014 г. – 300 с. (original) (raw)
Related papers
БОГАТЫРЕВ А.В. ЛИТЕРАТУРНЫЕ ПРЕДПОЧТЕНИЯ РУССКОГО ДИПЛОМАТА ВАСИЛИЯ ТЯПКИНА // ВОРОТЫНСКИЕ ЧТЕНИЯ. СРЕДНЕВЕКОВАЯ РОССИЯ: ВОЕННЫЙ И ДУХОВНЫЙ ПОДВИГ ПРЕДКОВ / ОТВ. РЕД. В.А. САБЛИН. ВОЛОГДА: ВОУНБ, 2020. Вып. 1. С. 62 - 66.
Среди дипломатов-интеллектуалов XVII столетия традиционно называют глав Посольского приказа, прежде всего, А. Л. Ордина-Нащокина, А. С. Матвеева, В. В. Голицына. Менее исследованы духовные запросы их подчиненных. Донесения одного из них, резидента в Речи Посполитой, раскрывают его «книжные» интересы, к числу которых относились близкие знатокам-современникам образцы религиозной и светской «элитарных» литератур, а также представители «низового» жанра.
Novogardia, 2019
Аннотация: В рецензии на статью А.А.Романчука отмечается, что Романчук старается показать, будто клятвы русов в договоре с греками были характерны не только для скандинавов, но также для славян, германцев и кельтов, но не учи-тывает при этом пространство и время, а также избирательно подходит к историо-графии, выхватывая то, что выгодно для его концепции, игнорируя неудобные для нее выводы специалистов. Ключевые слова: Клятвы, славяне, кельты, Романчук, скандинавы, ожившее оружие РЕЦЕНЗИИ УДК 94 (47) ББК 63(2)41
2022
The article serves as the introduction into the publication of the "Historical Letter" by V.I. Lamansky. The authors consider the context of V.I. Lamansky's discourse concerning the reciprocal relations between the Slavs and the Germans. Considering these relations as inimical, V.I. Lamansky substantiated this idea by references to the opinion of German scholars about the Slavs. He showed the malignancy of the German cultural and political influence on the Slavs, something which leads to the loss of their nationality, based on the example of Czech and, to some extent, Croatian history. It is not a coincidence that the essential part of the second "Historical Letter" is based on the material of the Hussite movement and Thirty Years' War which caused the germanisation of the Czech people. Lamansky attached great importance to the Hussite movement, as he considered it one of the highest manifestations of the Slavic self-consciousness (or at least of the Western Slavs). Based on the letters of the scholar showing his attitude to the Czech people, F. Palacky and other leaders of the Czech Revival, the authors demonstrate that Lamansky had probably borrowed the notion of "the Greek-Slavic world" as against the German-Roman world from German historiological literature. Being an adherent of Slavophilism, Lamansky considerably contributed to it. Particularly, he tried to more definitely formulate Slavophile's attitude to the "Slavic question," on which the attention of the founders of the movement had paid little attention. His interpretation of Slavic history was best realized in his master's thesis "On the Slavs in Middle Asia, Africa and Spain" (1859). The second "Historical Question" was likely written soon after finishing work on the thesis and was a step on the way to his other serious work, namely his doctoral thesis "On Historical Studies of the Greek-Slavic World in Europe" (1871), as both "Historical Letters" and the dissertation were written from similar historiographical positions.
МАСКУЛИННОСТЬ И ФЕМИНИННОСТЬ В ЛИТЕРАТУРЕ РУССКОГО МОДЕРНИЗМА: СЛУЧАИ БЛОКА И ЦВЕТАЕВОЙ
МАСКУЛИННОСТЬ И ФЕМИНИННОСТЬ В ЛИТЕРАТУРЕ РУССКОГО МОДЕРНИЗМА: СЛУЧАИ БЛОКА И ЦВЕТАЕВОЙ || Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2019. № 448. С. 30-34., 2019
Статья посвящена сопоставлению двух «систем гендерных координат» эпохи модернизма - А. Блока и М. Цветаевой. В результате анализа как художественных текстов, так и прямых, публицистических высказываний делаются выводы о разрушении гендерного эссенциализма в творческом сознании Блока и Цветаевой и об общей для них идее «нового» человека, который бы соединил в себе «женственное» и «мужественное» и тем самым стал существом высшего порядка. This article examines the constructing of gender in the Russian Modernist literature based on the works and life-building practices of two authors: Alexander Blok and Marina Tsvetaeva. Both poets create new (though relying on the long mythological and philosophical tradition) concept of femininity, but, in the case of Tsvetaeva, this novelty is radical, and, in the case of Blok, it is more related to the tradition. Tertium comparationis for these two cases is the fact that the important integral part of both poets’ artistic worlds was the gender-nonconforming figure of the female warrior. For Tsvetaeva, this image represents her alter ego (the main lyrical mask). For Blok, such a mask was the male warrior, and the female warrior was another fundamental plot actor. Thus, Blok’s lyrical hero appears in the most traditional role of the patriarchal culture, that of the warrior. But much less traditional is the fact that the main plot of Blok’s works, i.e. the Sophian myth with Gnostic origins, develops in two variants: not only of the imprisoned, enchanted and sleeping World Soul waiting to be rescued by the hero, but also of the hero which is kept by the forces of evil and ultimately released by the Sophia-like heroine. The traditional concept of male superiority is, therefore, partly overthrown in Blok’s artistic practice, but, in his direct statements, the poet usually stresses the affinity between the “heroic” and the “masculine”. It is also taken into consideration that Blok did not equate “masculine” with “male”, “feminine” with “female” and believed that the birth of the “new man” would happen as a union of the “masculine” and “feminine” elements. Tsvetaeva constructs gender, in particular, feminine, in a much more radical way than Blok. Her lyrical heroine is gender-nonconforming, masculinized (while Blok’s lyrical hero is rather conventional in gender sense) and not only infinitely superior to male characters who are, in turn, feminized and/or infantilized, but often does not need them at all: as a saint prophet, God’s herald on Earth renouncing flesh in general or as an Amazon despising men but not women. Her favorite heroines are androgynous, possessing both masculine and feminine traits (same as Tsvetaeva herself did, in her own opinion and in the opinions of others). Thus, the texts of both poets reflect the idea of the creation of the new, androgynous human who would be the creature of a higher order transcending the earthly baseness: the idea which was in the air of the Silver Age.
РУСКИ И СОВЈЕТСКИ УТИЦАЈИ НА СРПСКО И ЈУГОСЛОВЕНСКО ВАЗДУХОПЛОВСТВО
Тематски зборник радова "Сто десет година стварања и развоја српске војне авијације", 2022
Ваздухопловне везе између српског и руског народа датирају још из XIX века, односно доба првих проналазака у свету авијације. Током Првог светског рата руски утицај је био најуочљивији у присуству руских пилота у редовима Српске авијатике на Солунском фронту. У периоду југословенске краљевине значајан допринос развоју ваздухопловства дали су руски емигранти као конструктори авиона и пилоти у цивилној и војној авијацији. Деценије након Другог светског рата обележио је јак совјетски утицај на ваздухопловство социјалистичке Југославије. Доминација совјетске технике је била најуочљивија у ловачкој авијацији и ракетним јединицама противваздушне одбране. Тренд значајног присуства руске ваздухопловне технике настављен је и у Војсци Србије.