The Imperial Bond? Australia and the Coming Pacific War, 1937-41 - Presented at 2017 AHA Conference 'Entangled Histories' (original) (raw)
Related papers
The limits of Empire: Australia, eastern appeasement and the drift to war in the Pacific, 1937–41
2018
Despite Australia’s regional security interests being intimately involved in the Pacific War, scholarship often portrays the nation as uninvolved in preparations for the imminent regional conflict. Rather, Australia ‘suffered from a chronic lack of self-reliance’, looking instinctively to the British Empire and the security it afforded. This article proposes that in the years 1937–41, the Australian government – first under Joseph Lyons and then Robert Menzies – recognised both the immediacy of the Japanese threat and the limitations of imperial defence plans and accordingly responded with a concerted policy for the coming regional conflict. The principal focus of this article is Australia’s position towards Japan and the implied pragmatic appraisal by Australia of the strategic value of diplomacy in maintaining regional stability. In the context of this growing assertiveness, this article also considers broader tensions in the Australian–British relationship, tensions centred on each nation’s respective and divergent position towards Japan. In this way, this article is more than just an examination of strategic appraisals, rearmament and diplomacy. It seeks to comment on Australian geopolitics, its relations with great powers, and the challenge of balancing national interests.
Engaging with the Asia-Pacific : Australian foreign policy in the Pacific century
1997
This thesis examines Australia's engagement with the Asia-Pacific. It seeks to locate Australian foreign policy within a larger Westerri discourse of international relations (IR) and geopolitics which has provided the dominant understandings, meanings and boundaries of international political life in the modem period. In the chapters to follow, I show how this larger discourse has been articulated in the history of Australian foreign policy through the dominant elite perspectives of market liberalism and power politics realism. Rather than treating these perspectives as discrete, mutually exclusive theories of IR, however, I understand each as contending poles of this larger Western discourse. In doing so, I argue that liberalism and realism have traditionally framed Australia's encounter with the AsiaPacific region. I also show that, in continuing to draw on these dominant perspectives, contemporary policy-makers have pursued a diplomacy of regional engagement designed to i...
H-Diplo Round-Table Reviews, 2021
For Australia as for much of the rest of the globe, the First World War represented a key turning point, prompting a new sense of national identity that thereafter grew steadily stronger. The period extending from the peace negotiations following the end of this conflict to the outbreak of full-scale war between Japan and China in 1937 was a time when Australia began to assemble a corps of diplomats and bureaucrats specializing in international affairs, to create what would become a distinctive foreign policy trajectory designed to promote specifically Australian interests, and to face up to dilemmas that would continue to preoccupy and perplex Australian leaders throughout much of the twentieth century and beyond. The formation of the ‘Pacific Branch’ in 1919 in the Prime Minister’s office, managed by E.L. Piesse, followed by the more formal re-establishment within the Prime Minister’s Department in 1921 of the Department of External Affairs, marked the true beginnings of a discrete Australian foreign affairs agency. The appearance in 2019—coincidentally also marking the centenary of the Paris Peace Conference, where Australia’s Prime Minister William “Billy” Hughes was a notable personality—of the first of two volumes covering the years spanning the aftermath of the First World War to 1936 is therefore particularly welcome.
The interwar period represents an era of emerging growth and maturity in Australian foreign and defence relations, with a distinct focus shift from Imperial to regional matters. However, this expression of independent policy has been largely overlooked in the existing literature. Rather, Australian policy makers of this era have been framed as disinterested in policy making, lacking direction and preferring 'to deal with the world one step removed through Whitehall'. Such interpretations have overlooked significant policy changes throughout this period, painting Australia as a timid and naïve nation, content to follow Britain's every policy and demand. This article will challenge such views, drawing upon a recent growth in literature that supports the notion of growing assertiveness in Australian foreign and defence policy throughout the 1920s and 1930s. In doing so, this article will seek to redefine the interwar image of Australia. This will be achieved through an examination of Australia's response to the increasingly doubtful diplomatic and security assurances it received from Britain throughout the 1920s and 1930s. The uncertainty that this created forced Australian policy makers to assess their previously unchallenged commitment to the British
Pax Australis: The History of Australia's Imperial Internationalism
2020
A great deal has been written about how global affairs and the international ambitions of other nations have shaped Australia, but almost nothing has been written to address the question of just how effective Australian Governments have been at devising and pursuing their own visions for how the world should be organised. In response to this question, this thesis explores instances in which Australia tried to shape the world and it presents the argument that these instances were guided by ideological motivations that came to form 'traditions of internationalism'. To support this proposition, this dissertation chronicles the history of Australia's tradition of Imperial Internationalism, which guided Australia's approach to the world from Federation to the late 1960s. This history demonstrates a remarkable ambition and ideological consistency at the heart of Australia's approach to the world. By exploring Australia's past to identify its traditions of internationalism, this dissertation not only presents an alternative approach to documenting Australia's past, but it also reveals an understanding of Australia's impact on world affairs that is altogether different from the established literature. A number of historians have reinforced the notion that Australia's historical relationships with the British Empire and the United States made Australia's international endeavours derivative of, and dependent upon, these great powers, leading some to even dispute the true independence of Australia. Concurrently, others have argued that an independent Australian approach to the world was apparent even prior to Federation. This piece seeks to reconcile these disparate views by demonstrating that the forces of Australian nationalism and British imperialism were in fact complimentary to Australia's international ambitions. This history of Australia's tradition of Imperial Internationalism reveals that successive Australian Governments were effective at using great power relationships to project Australia's own self-devised international ambitionsambitions that were often bold and disruptive. It explains that Australia's chief ambition during this period was to entrench British and American power in its neighbourhood for the purpose of reinforcing Western hegemony over the developing nations of the Asia-Pacific region. This thesis therefore demonstrates that Australia had a significant impact on global affairs in the twentieth century that is disproportionate to the historical perception of Australia as a smaller power. Not least of all, this impact was accomplished because of the ability of successive governments to shape and influence the behaviour of two great powers with whom Australia shared powerful ideological affinities. …o0o… iv This thesis has been enabled by support from the following organisations and programs:
Australia: A Mid-level Imperialist in the Asia-Pacific
Historical Materialism, 2015
Australia, long seen as a remote outpost of the British Empire in the South Pacific and more recently as a loyal lieutenant of Washington, does not fit the traditional image of an imperialist country. Nonetheless, while it may not be one of the big three or four world powers, it is, I will argue, a mid-level imperialist that leverages its alliance with the United States to project power over its region. It has been and remains reliant on foreign capital, but it is also a wealthy independent centre of capital accumulation and military power with its own national interests and with an increasing financial footprint overseas.
"A vigorous offence": Australian and Imperial planning for a Pacific war, 1902-1914
An unpublished paper presented at the one-day symposium led by Dr Christine Winter, "A Southern War: Australia, the Pacific and WWI", Australian National University, 28 November 2014. The paper explores Australian military planning before the First World War, with a special emphasis on naval planning, stressing the willingness of war planners to contemplate offensive action, and expeditionary warfare on the part of Australia.
Journal of New Zealand and Pacific Studies, 2015
An examination of the attitude of the Pacific Dominions to Japan during the First World War indicates that each of the Dominions followed a path from heeding the Imperial government’s advice not to be too critical of its Far Eastern ally in the early stages of the war to giving voice to increasing concern about Japanese penetration into the Pacific as the war progressed. I focus on Japanese military mobilization at the outbreak of war, its takeover of the German Pacific colonies north of the equator, and its insistence on keeping them at the end of the war. These three episodes indicate that Dominion attitudes to Japan sometimes actually influenced the making of British foreign policy. There were points where the British government clearly tried to take on concerns from Australia, Canada and New Zealand in its position towards Japan. A good example of this is the British government’s attempts to secure the Japanese government’s support in issuing a joint statement that the latter was not planning on seizing former German colonies in the Pacific that the Dominions intended to deal with themselves in the early stages of the war. But there were also other periods where the realities of great power politics meant that the three Dominions had to accept the position adopted by the Imperial government.
Resolving the Anzac Dilemma Australian Foreign Policy, 1942-1952
In this era of US-China superpower rivalry, some analysts observe that Australia will eventually be forced to reconsider its choice of partner. It may be informative to consider how Australia resolved this dilemma when America overtook Britain as the dominant regional and world power in the mid-twentieth century. Whilst military strength and cultural links were critical in Australia"s search for security, in the 1940s the Australian government undertook radical economic alterations that impacted upon its relationships. These fundamental changes and their impacts are regularly absent in studies of Australian foreign policy. In the crises of both 1941 and 1950, Australia looked for US support which was forthcoming. However, whilst when the Japanese crisis ebbed in 1942-43, Australia resumed its traditional imperial links, the stabilisation of the Korean War did not see the same outcome. After a decade of Australian economic development, non-Anglo immigration, the decline in Anglo...