Designing the forecasting process to manage bias: Commentary on the Guiding Principles (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mind the gap – linking forecasting with decisionmaking.
Improving forecasting is an essential challenge to everyone who is involved in looking at the future. Therefore, forecasters do everything they can to improve their models and to enlarge their datasets. However, we consider this a one-sided approach to solving the problem. Better forecasting does also mean paying more attention to the user of the forecast, i.e. the decisionmaker. In our view, building models and compiling datasets while being strongly aware of the wishes, needs and circumstances of the decisionmaker will result in better forecasts and subsequently better decisions.
Development of a Model for Identification of Reasons for Deviation in Forecasts
2015
Most organizations use forecasting techniques in order to achieve their goals and to reduce risk in uncertain conditions and varying situations. Forecasting by senior managers plays a very important role in the success or failure of organization and company projects as well as their affairs. However, the scope of forecasting has not yet structured or regulated and there is no approved or special conceptual framework for it, especially in relation to the reasons decisions of mangers deviate while forecasting, which can have a crucial influence on the whole organization. The aim of this study is to develop a conceptual model of the reasons for deviation from forecasting by senior managers. To understand the subject, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the research and literature was carried out. A conceptual model was developed according to the results of this research and the data from a focus group. The results of meta-analysis show that trends in optimistic and pessimistic for...
How Good Is a "Good" Forecast?: Forecast Errors and Their Avoidability
Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, 2013
With this article, Foresight continues its examination of forecastabilityÐ the potential accuracy of our forecasting efforts Ð which is one of the most perplexing yet essential issues for the business forecasting profession. We first tackled the subject with a special feature section in our Spring 2009 issue. The introduction there indicated that assessing the forecastability of a historical time series can give us a basis for judging how successful our modeling has been (benchmarking), and how much improvement we can still hope to attain. ForesightOs Summer 2012 issue advanced the discussion with a feature article showing how to use a productOs DNA Ð product and market attributes such as the length, variability, and market concentration of sales Ð to develop benchmarks for forecast accuracy. The essential idea here is to better understand the specifics of those items we are trying to forecast and to set expectations accordingly. Certain key concepts emerged from the articles in tha...
Journal of Forecasting, 1994
A decomposition of the Brier skill score shows that the performance of judgmental forecasts depends on seven components: environmental predictability, fidelity of the information system, match between environment and forecaster, reliability of information acquisition, reliability of information processing, conditional bias, and unconditional bias. These components provide a framework for research on the forecasting process. Selected literature addressing each component is reviewed, and implications for improving judgmental forecasting are discussed. KEY WORDS Judgmental forecasting Brier skill score Lens model equation Bias Reliability In any field requiring judgmental forecasts, the performance of professional forecasters depends jointly on (1) the environment about which forecasts are made, (2) the information system that brings data about the environment to the forecaster, and (3) the cognitive system of the forecaster. For example, in weather forecasting the environment includes the atmosphere and the land, ocean and solar features that affect weather. The information system includes the instruments, observations, and algorithms that produce information about past and current weather and the communication and display systems that bring that information to the forecaster. The cognitive system consists of the perceptual and judgmental processes that the forecaster uses to acquire information, aggregate it, and produce the forecast. This paper describes how certain properties of these three systems combine to determine forecasting performance. A commonly used measure of skill (the 'skill score' based on the mean-square-error) is analyzed into seven components. Since each component describes a different aspect of forecast performance, the decomposition suggests a framework for research on judgmental forecasting.
Managing Functional Biases in Organizational Forecasts
Foresight the International Journal of Applied Forecasting, 2006
FORESIGHT Issue 5 Fall 2006 T he forecast process improvement section of Foresight has showcased best practices and lessons from successful companies. We continue this theme in the current issue with a case study of an organization that significantly improved its supply chain performance by implementing a consensus forecasting process.
Do forecasts produced by organizations reflect anchoring and adjustment?
Journal of Forecasting, 1987
In attempting to improve forecasting, many facets of the forecasting process may be addressed including techniques, psychological factors, and organizational factors. This research examines whether a robust psychological bias (anchoring and adjustment) can he observed in a set of organizationally-produced forecasts. Rather than a simple consistent bias, biases were found to vary across organizations and items being forecast. Such bias patterns suggest that organizational factors may be important in determining the biases found in organizationally-produced forecasts, KEY WORDS Forecasting-organisational Behavioural decision-theory Anchoring Adjustment
Bridging the gap between theory and practice in forecasting
International Journal of Forecasting, 1992
The successful implementation of forecasting in many organizations is hampered by gaps in communication and understanding between forecast preparers and forecast users. Different individuals in organizations may have varying political agendas which impact the forecasting process. Advances in forecasting can be limited because of the gap between forecasting theorists and practitioners. This paper discusses these issues. In particular, it reports on a series of roundtable discussions on the gap between theory and practice which took place at the 1991 International Symposium on Forecasting. The paper includes suggestions on ways to bridge the gap.
The handbook of forecasting: A manager's guide
European Journal of Operational Research, 1983
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.