The Flipside of the Integration Question: Guest Worker Regimes and Temporary Circular-Managed Migration in History (original) (raw)
Related papers
The IMISCOE Research Network unites researchers from, at present, 29 institutes specialising in studies of international migration, integration and social cohesion in Europe. What began in 2004 as a Network of Excellence sponsored by the Sixth Framework Programme of the European Commission became, as of April 2009, an independent self-funding endeavour. From the start, IMISCOE has promoted integrated, multidisciplinary and globally comparative research led by scholars from various branches of the economic and social sciences, the humanities and law. The network furthers existing studies and pioneers new scholarship on migration and migrant integration. Encouraging innovative lines of inquiry key to European policymaking and governance is also a priority. The IMISCOE-Amsterdam University Press Series makes the network's findings and results available to researchers, policymakers and practitioners, the media and other interested stakeholders. High-quality manuscripts authored by network members and cooperating partners are evaluated by external peer reviews and the IMISCOE Editorial Committee. The committee comprises the following members:
Servitude, brain drain and human trafficking are some of the outcomes of human migration in the 20th century. After slavery and slave trade were abolished in the 19th century, forced labour and servitude evolved. In the 20th century started modern servitude, like the ‘guest workers’ in Europe and ‘force labour’ in Africa. Brain-drain and human trafficking followed from the middle of the 20th century. This paper focuses on the influence of immigration policies by examining some ideologies, such as: ‘diversity, selective, restrictive, exclusionary and closed doors policies’. It argues that immigration policies are designed to perpetuate the structure of inequality established through the institutions of slavery and colonialism. It discusses analytically the effect of western immigration policies on the composition and volume of migrant workers in destination countries of America, Europe and Asia. This paper further discusses the politics of global migration, employing the neo-Marxist historical structural model. It elicits the significance of immigration policies to the capitalist economies as its grand design to sustain economic inequality and the dependency of the periphery on the core. Thus, immigration policies in the advanced capitalist economies were used in the 20th century, as slavery was used in the past, to exploit Africa’s viable human resources.
Migration Letters, 2022
While the search for (better) employment and the uneven distribution of wealth are among the principal triggers of migration worldwide, migration is often discussed as a humanitarian emergency, a social and a security problem, but rarely as a labour issue. This paper aims to foster debate on the interconnectedness of migration and labour history. Re-reading migration and labour history by exploring their interconnectedness is crucial to overcoming Eurocentric and nation-state centric approaches to labour and migration history. This paper discusses the findings of papers presented at two events organised by the ELHN Working Group Labour Migration History in 2021. The first part suggests new lines of inquiry which critically reassess Western-centric understandings and experiences of labour migration during the Cold War. The second part argues in favour of cross-disciplinary study of relations between migration, workers, and the state firmly contextualised as part of global processes of change.
Temporary and circular labour migration: reassessing established public policies
2009
Today, Temporary Labour Migration is a fundamental course of action promoted by relevant economic and political agents, such as the EC, the GCIM, or the OECD. This working paper is based on a specific empirical case study of Temporary and Circular Labour Migration in the Catalonian agrarian sector, which has been distinguished as a particularly successful formula. We identify a new area of interest: the emergence of a new empirical migrant category, the Circular Labour Migrant, which remains theoretically unnamed and lacks public recognition. We argue that, until now, there have been two historical phases regarding temporary labour migration: one of total deregulation and another of partial regulation, led by private actors with support from public institutions, and featuring circularity. In a developed Welfare State context, it would be normatively pertinent to expect a step towards a third phase, one involving the institutionalization of this new mobility category through the elaboration of a public policy
The Migration and Labor Question Today Imperialism, Unequal Development, and Forced Migration
It is impossible to disentangle the migration and labor question today without a deep understanding of the nature of contemporary capitalism, namely, neoliberal globalization. One of the main features of the new global architecture, boosted by the emergence of one of the most distressing global crises since the Great Depression, is the assault on the labor and living conditions of the majority of the global working class, and in particular the migrant workforce, which is among the most vulnerable segments of this class. This essay will analyze some key aspects of the system that contemporary migration is embedded in, with emphasis on the process of segmentation and the growing precariousness (precarization) of labor markets worldwide. The aim is to unravel: a) the re-launching of imperialism (policies of global domination) in search of cheap and flexible labor, as well as natural resources from the South; b) the growing asymmetries among and within countries and regions; c) the increase and intensification of social inequalities; d) the configuration of a gigantic global reserve army of labor associated with the emergence of severe forms of labor precarization and exploitation; and e) the predominance of forced migration as the primary mode of human mobility under conditions of extreme vulnerability. From this perspective, the migration and labor questions are two sides of the same coin, whose currency translates into unbearable conditions of systematic oppression of the working class. To combat this, there must be, among other things, a unity of social organizations and
Temporary labour migration, global redistribution and democratic just
Calls to expand temporary work programmes come from two directions. First, as global justice advocates observe, every year thousands of poor migrants cross borders in search of better opportunities, often in the form of improved employment opportunities. As a result, international organizations now lobby in favour of expanding ‘guestwork’ opportunities, that is, opportunities for citizens of poorer countries to migrate temporarily to wealthier countries to fill labour shortages. Second, temporary work programmes permit domestic governments to respond to two internal, contradictory political pressures: (1) to fill labour shortages and (2) to do so without increasing rates of permanent migration. Temporary work programmes permit governments to appear ‘tough’ on migration, while responding to employer pressure to locate workers willing to work in low-skilled, poorly remunerated positions. The coincidence of national selfinterest and global justice generates a strong case in favour of expanding guest-work. We evaluate the moral benefits and burdens of expanding guest-work opportunities, and conclude that although there are benefits to be gleaned from the perspective of global wealth redistribution, at present, temporary work programmes are generally unjust. We will argue that just temporary work programmes, in time, permit temporary workers to attain citizenship. This spells the end of traditional temporary work programmes, which require that workers return to their home country in time; instead, what is temporary is the employment obligation that must be fulfilled as a requirement to access citizenship. As long as this requirement is met, we endorse guest-work programmes as a tool to respond to global inequality.